Does it really matter who killed JFK?
Isn't the really important thing the fact that the Kremlin and its KGB (today's SVR and FSB) have "made hay" out of the anomaly-replete assassination, literally since Day One when some Kremlin functionaries told Morris Childs -- one of the FBI's SOLO brothers who couriered $28 million from the Kremlin to the CPUSA over twenty years -- that it had nothing to do with former Marine sharpshooter and U-2 radar operator Oswald during the two-and-a-half years he lived in the USSR?
And, for example, in March of 1967 the KGB planted an anti-CIA/anti-Clay Shaw article in a Communist-owned Italian newspaper, which article was given to over-ambitious, scandal-plagued, and revengeful New Orleans D.A. Jim Garrison by Joan Mellen's far-left ex-husband. The article motivated Garrison to change his theory against Shaw from "He masterminded a Loeb-and-Leopold-like homosexual thrill-kill assassination of JFK!" to "He organized it for the evil, evil, evil CIA!!!" Factoid: In his 1989 book, "On the Trail of the Assassins," Garrison lied when he said he didn't read the article until after the 1969 trial.
Rhetorical question: If "Deep State Fascists" killed JFK, are they disappointed that it took so long to get someone like Donald Trump in the White House?
