Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
Mark Ulrik, Royell Storing, Jarrett Smith, Barry Wilton, Mitch Todd

Author Topic: Why Altgens 6 Refutes the Lone-Gunman Theory  (Read 127 times)

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3862
Re: Why Altgens 6 Refutes the Lone-Gunman Theory
« Reply #7 on: Today at 08:04:03 PM »
Glanges was pretty sure it was a through and through bullet hole.

Covered up at the Rouge Plant 3 days later.

Of course.

The Rouge Plant was just another cog in Steve "I am a Leninist" Bannon's Deep State-Administrative State and/or Jimmy D'Eugenio's Military Industrial Intelligence-Community Complex that killed JFK and Jimi Hendrix, too!!!

Online Michael T. Griffith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1756
    • JFK Assassination Website
Re: Why Altgens 6 Refutes the Lone-Gunman Theory
« Reply #8 on: Today at 08:08:55 PM »

MG: A Dallas police officer actually put a pencil through the hole to confirm it was a hole.

TG: Who was that?

DPD officer Stavis Ellis.


Show us the damage that is "undisputedly" visible in Altgens 6.

Seriously? Well, this is a first. You're the first person I've ever encountered who has disputed the windshield damage visible in Altgens 6.

Folks, again, the link for Weldon's chapter on the hole in the limo's windshield has been fixed. I had the wrong link in the first version of the OP.  Here it is again:

"The Kennedy Limousine: Dallas 1963"

But I repeat that this thread is not intended to debate the evidence of a hole in the windshield but to show that the lone-gunman theory cannot explain the windshield damage seen in Altgens 6 and in the Zapruder film.


Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5435
Re: Why Altgens 6 Refutes the Lone-Gunman Theory
« Reply #9 on: Today at 08:51:07 PM »
Show us the damage that is "undisputedly" visible in Altgens 6.

   MARK -  I agree. This "undisputedly" stuff with respect to Altgens 6 and possible windshield damage is pure  BS: Thanks for maintaining a "standard of proof" around here.

Online Mark Ulrik

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 90
Re: Why Altgens 6 Refutes the Lone-Gunman Theory
« Reply #10 on: Today at 08:57:23 PM »
Seriously? Well, this is a first. You're the first person I've ever encountered who has disputed the windshield damage visible in Altgens 6.

Are you for real? No one has ever disputed that the windshield was damaged, but is the damage visible in Altgens 6? Undisputedly? Your (w)hole argument depends on it, so I was hoping that it wouldn't be too inconvenient for you to actually show us.

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3862
Re: Why Altgens 6 Refutes the Lone-Gunman Theory
« Reply #11 on: Today at 08:57:41 PM »
DPD officer Stavis Ellis actually put a pencil through the hole to confirm it was a hole.

Stavis Ellis doesn't say that in this YouTube video.


He says, "You could put a pencil through it."

Unless you can provide us with a quote in which he says he or Chaney actually put a pencil through it, you're a liar.

It seems to me that you lie a lot.
« Last Edit: Today at 09:00:32 PM by Tom Graves »