On the Trail of Delusion, Episode 39, with Bill Brown on location in Oak Cliff

[Martin Weidmann]

Handwriting-wise, the signatures on the 22 October 1964 bill of sale and the 22 October 1964 affidavit that Ripley's has are identical to the signature on the affidavit that was signed in front of notary public Mary Rattan on 22 November 1963.

https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth338255/m1/1/

https://steveroeconsulting.wixsite.com/website/post/buell-wesley-frazier-s-car

First of all, why do you represent something I've never written as a fake quote?

Secondly, since when are you a handwriting expert?

Thirdly, you might want to compare the Mary Rattan affidavit, dated 22 November 1963, with the fake one which doesn't even identify the "notary"

But there's an easy solution; Bill could simply ask new best friend Frazier to confirm the Ripley's "affidavits" to be authentic.... so why doesn't he?

[Tom Graves]

Compare the Mary Rattan affidavit, dated 22 November 1963, with the fake one which doesn't even identify the "notary"

Is the notary's signature legible?

[Bill Brown]

First of all, why do you represent something I've never written as a fake quote?

Secondly, since when are you a handwriting expert?

Thirdly, you might want to compare the Mary Rattan affidavit, dated 22 November 1963, with the fake one which doesn't even identify the "notary"

But there's an easy solution; Bill could simply ask new best friend Frazier to confirm the Ripley's "affidavits" to be authentic.... so why doesn't he?

First, the Ripley's affidavit, which you claim is fake (without support), does indeed "identify the notary".  The signature is there for all to see.  We have verified that the I.O. Fowler was a notary in Texas at the time.  We know his full name and where he worked, etc... More to come (once we have all of our ducks in a row).

Last month, we did confront Frazier with the affidavits.  More to come on that, too.

Patients Grasshopper.  And stop being so fcukin' hateful.