If you don't want to explain how the affidavit is fake, that's fine.
In april, I already told you that they were fakes. You claimed that you already had made an attempt to verify, which of course means you were not sure yourself and nevertheless had presented them as being authentic.
I have no need to lie. Also, I have pics. Not that you'll ever see them.
As for your "ego" comment, you're being foolish. I didn't speak of having dinner with Buell Frazier until it was necessary. I posted the two affidavits where Frazier acknowledges that the rifle was in the car. You called them fakes. That prompted me to inform you that I've already made an attempt to verify.
Like you, I simply wanted to verify for myself (in this case, the authenticity of the two affidavits). If I had plans to speak of what was discussed during this pizza dinner with Buell, then I would have asked him (and Dave Perry) right then and there if I could discuss (on various internet forums and Facebook groups) what we talked about.
How many times are you going to comment on something which you know nothing about?
It has been three months since that and you still haven't told us what the result of your "verification" is.
Instead, you play dumb and simply go back to pretending the affidavits are authentic, so you can once again ask for them to be proven fakes.
I have no need for hypocrisy here. I have indeed shown a statement (signed, in fact) by Frazier where he acknowledges that the rifle was in the bag, i.e. the bag was large enough for the rifle, i.e. the bag couldn't have been carried the way Frazier described.
Hilarious.
I'm not going to get into a "prove it's fake" conversation. If you want people to believe that Frazier actually would admit in a real affidavit that he lied to the police and the WC, have at it!
The next time you see him (if you ever saw him to begin with) tell him about your "find" at Ripley's believe it or not and see how he responds.
