What five anomalies have complicated the investigation over the years?

[Royell Storing]

I guess when you can't refute what I wrote, you resort to nonsense like this.

    Why would I attempt to "refute" your foolish position of the Pristine Bullet traveling BACKWARD. That automatically fails on its' face. My point is you're taking the position of, "That's my story and I'm sticking to it". You're stuck like a captain onna ship going down.

[Tom Graves]

    Why would I attempt to "refute" your foolish position of the Pristine Bullet traveling BACKWARD. That automatically fails on its' face. My point is you're taking the position of, "That's my story and I'm sticking to it". You're stuck like a captain onna ship going down.

Dear Royell,

We know CE-399 was already tumbling when it penetrated JBC's back and then traveled several inches along his fifth rib and shattered it before it exited his chest.

Given that, why in the world couldn't it have been tumbling/twirling when it penetrated his wrist, and done so butt-end-first?

-- Tom

[Martin Weidmann]

Dear Royell,

We know CE-399 was already tumbling when it penetrated JBC's back and then traveled several inches along his fifth rib and shattered it before it exited his chest.

Given that, why in the world couldn't it have been tumbling/twirling when it penetrated his wrist, and done so butt-end-first?

-- Tom

We know CE-399 was already tumbling when it penetrated JBC's back

And "we" know this how, exactly?

[Royell Storing]

Dear Royell,

We know CE-399 was already tumbling when it penetrated JBC's back and then traveled several inches along his fifth rib and shattered it before it exited his chest.

Given that, why in the world couldn't it have been tumbling/twirling when it penetrated his wrist, and done so butt-end-first?

-- Tom

    I am sure you Know the difference between "TUMBLING" vs Moving "BACKWARD". Stop trying to circle the wagons here, he got it wrong. Unless, you too want to claim the Pristine Bullet was moving BACKWARD? And they used to laugh at Dr. Cyril Wecht when he would describe the zig-zag path of the Pristine Bullet. This "BACKWARD" moving Pristine Bullet stuff exceeds Wecht by far.

[Benjamin Cole]

TG-

This is a photo of the small round hole in the rear of Gov. JBC's assassination-day shirt.



This small round shirt-hole was actually enlarged twice, legitimately, once by the FBI and once by the HSCA, to test cloth for metallic residue. The initial hole was even smaller, but unfortunately it appears there are no photos of the original, even smaller hole.

JBC's surgeon, Dr. Robert Shaw, who worked on 700-odd wartime bullet wounds while serving in the WWII Army, was of the opinion that JBC received a direct shot from above and behind, which left an ovoid wound, north-south on JBC's back, per his drawing of the wound.

Shaw expanded or debrided JBC's back wound to remove dead flesh and any foreign material, leading to confusion about the actual size of initial wound later.

In addition, the exit hole in JBC's assassination-day suit is also small and round, indicating the slug was not tumbling as it exited JBC.



I conclude the slug that struck Gov. JBC's back was not tumbling, in concordance with the sentiments of Dr. Shaw, a very experienced surgeon, with no evident axes to grind.

The "tumbling bullet" appears to be among the many myths subscribed to by LNT'ers, or CT'ers, regarding the JFKA, in order to buttress their narratives. 

https://www.tsl.texas.gov/lobbyexhibits/jfk-suit

[John Corbett]

    Why would I attempt to "refute" your foolish position of the Pristine Bullet traveling BACKWARD.

Yes why would you when you can't.

That automatically fails on its' face.

How so? Do you dispute that a Carcano bullet will tumble upon exiting from soft tissue?

My point is you're taking the position of, "That's my story and I'm sticking to it". You're stuck like a captain onna ship going down.

My ship isn't going down. It's been afloat for 62 years. In that time I've seen a lot of conspiracy theories end up in Davy Jones's locker. I'll keep sticking to my story until somebody comes up with a better one that is based on real evidence and not conjecture. After 62 years, I see little chance of that happening.