Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
Barry Wilton, W. Tracy Parnell, Gerry Down, Benjamin Cole

Author Topic: The Luna committee is bogus ...  (Read 100 times)

Online Karl Kinaski

  • Subscriber
  • *
  • Posts: 4
The Luna committee is bogus ...
« on: Today at 06:52:43 AM »
  "How can one expect a president to shed light on the assassination of another president when he is not even interested in investigating the assassination attempt on himself?"



Candace Owens says President Trump is covering up the truth about the Butler assassination attempt because it was either staged or intended as a warning shot to force him into compliance. Owens says Dan Bongino is in full panic mode as questions continue to grow around the case, calling him a "stone-cold liar."
 
---------------------


Judyth Baker on X yesterday, quote

Judyth Vary Baker
@Judyth
·
Jun 12
My attempts to testify to Luna about Lee Harvey Oswald has resulted in a humungous email effort to STOP me, using old arguments from 20 years ago based on altered emails and misquotes. Desperate to stop me, here's what they are ending to everyone they can think of:
"Judyth Vary Baker...fails on chronology (the Cancún anachronism, met with characteristic blame-shifting), on corroboration (Anna Lewis places her with Oswald while he was in Minsk), and on her sole documentary tether — a Reily Coffee W-2 whose authenticity is contested and which, in any event, ​suggests only co-employment; no contemporaneous Reily co-worker mentions her at all." GOT THAT? Now here are some facts to chew on:
THE CANCUN BRUHAHA
"Judyth Vary Baker ...fails on chronology (the Cancún anachronism, met with characteristic blame-shifting),..."
20 yrs ago, I had not yet located evidence about the real Cancun we planned to visit BEFORE perhaps going to Chichen-Itza. My agent, Peter Cox, thought a "fine hotel" Lee mentioned was on the then-deserted island of Cancun. We had planned to tay at a tiny village called Kankun, certainly no fine hotel.
     For this and other gaffs, such as claiming I'd been sh^t at in Mexico, and had been hiding in Europe, I fired him. My insistence that we KNEW Cancun was called a lie. I insisted that an archeological dig was conducted there in July 1963, which Lee and I saw on exhibit in late August at Tulane' Latin American Library. Lee knew a CIA agent had rented a boat to go there - Dr. Wyllys Andrews -- who said the beach was suitable as an airstrip.  I was finally able to prove the dig and exhibit occurred, and that I knew Cancun was a desert island back in 1963, in 2023 - multiple researchers went in person with me to Tulane' Latin American Library and found the evidence: the dig, the maps, the photos, just as I had described them. I had never even mentioned Cancun until my agent mentioned it, because of course, Lee was ordered back to Dallas and then was framed.
    According to my enemies, I planned to meet Lee at a "fine hotel" at Cancun in 1963. They are shameless liars. The documents proving the dig, maps, etc, were photographed in a documentary June 5, 2026. And I have the name of those who witnessed finding the evidence.

"However, on corroboration (Anna Lewis places her with Oswald while he was in Minsk)..."  36 years later, Anna Lewis, who was filmed without any warning or preparation, remembered seeing Lee Oswald for the first time in 1962. She was off by a year. She spent over 35 minute describing everything else in detail, such as that Lee and I double-dated with her and her husband, David (who is in the JFK record). If anything, missing the date by one year how Anna Lewis wa not coached and had not prepared anything in advance.

THIS LAST ONE IGNORES NEW EVIDENCE:

"and on her sole documentary tether — a Reily Coffee W-2 whose authenticity is contested and which, in any event, ​suggests only co-employment..."

LOL! There are check stubs, bank statements, executive stationery, and now, Lee's time cards I had described which were finally released by the FBI some 12 years ago, which have my initial "J" on 6 of Lee's 11 time cards from Reily.
We were also registered at the A-1 Employment office (there were 6 active and 9 total employment office in New Orleans),
we were hired the same day to work at a tiny Reily sub-company (Standard) where our record were laundered, then transferred together a week later to Reily.

The day Lee was fired, an ad was ordered to replace me,  as our job were together.

I was fired a week early on Aug 9 - the same day Lee was arrested - because I was seen with him.

They are griping that the W2 form I have was forged!

 They wrote:
"...no contemporaneous Reily co-worker mentions her at all."
   That is a lie. My witness is in my book, Lee Harvey Oswald and Me, along with her photo from 1963. Also, a private detective hired by a person still alive interviewed Reily workers who remembered me, but not Lee (he was a maintenance man, I was the Vice President'ss Finance and Security Secretary, quite visible.

 Their 20-year-old accusations were never updated. Besides failing to update, NOT ONE OF MY ACCUSERS EVER CONTACTED ME for information all thee years. They relied on emails that in some cases can be easily seen to have been altered.

I am 83 years old. Most of my supporters who saw my original evidence are now gone. Some of my documents have been stolen. I have suffered injuries, threats and bankruptcy. I have never asked for money for any interview.

Two of my enemieshave recently been added to Rep. Luna' committee. They want to make sure my voice is never heard.

I'm also being muzzled here on X. My information on cancer a a bioweapon, in 1963, using the SV40 Monkey Virus, wasrevealed in 1999. Powerful Big Pharma source don't want me to peak, either.

I am writing this to set the record straight with the public. Lee Harvey Oswald was framed. He was silenced forever in front of 70+ Dallas Police.

THEY WANT ME TO BE SILENCED FOREVER, TOO.

PLEASE HELP PROTECT ME.
PLEAE REPOST THIS. 
 I THANK GOD I AM STILL ABLE TO SPEAK.
Thank you for your time.
God bless you all.

Close quote




 
« Last Edit: Today at 12:36:15 PM by Karl Kinaski »

Online Lance Payette

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1469
Re: The Luna committee is bogus ...
« Reply #1 on: Today at 12:52:30 PM »
Well, JVB is correct about one thing: I do want her to be silenced forever. Not dead, mind you, just silenced. A classic example of what plagues every area of weirdness: the desperate for attention wannabe.

I heard a clip of Candace Owens doing an antisemitic rant on Christian talk radio yesterday. It's absolutely astonishing how she has descended from far-right darling who used to seem more or less sensible on FOX News and other mainstream outlets to complete radioactive wacko. Come to think of it, they played a clip of Tucker Carlson, too.

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5337
Re: The Luna committee is bogus ...
« Reply #2 on: Today at 02:15:01 PM »

   The goal of people like Owens is to achieve some level of notoriety = $$. Their role, (and it is a "role"), is no different than the "heavy" in wrestling match. People pay to see them, or in Owens case "click" on a computer. Nothing has changed here, as the bottom line is always $$. People believe that because someone is routinely on FOX NEWS or MSNOW, etc, that they are making all kinds of $$. That's just Not true. When you hear their position described as "contributor", they ain't makin' jack/$$. People you see with "news" shows on the weekend only, ain't makin' jack. They are basically auditioning for a regular "gig" during the week. They are  generally regarded as 1st in line, but their weekend duty is still that of "auditioning".
   Back when Johnny Carson was doing "The Tonight Show", his guests whether it was Burt Reynolds or that 89 yr old firefighter from Maine, were paid Union Scale/$$ to appear on the show. Of course, the "guest" also had to be a member of the Screen Actors Guild in order to appear on the show. For someone such as the 89 yr old firefighter, the 1 appearance on the show resulted in close to a net "wash" monetarily. This is what people such as Owens are making during their association with FOX NEWS. Same goes for clowns like Al Sharpton over at MSNOW. These people ain't making jack/$$.

Online Michael T. Griffith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1604
    • JFK Assassination Website
Re: The Luna committee is bogus ...
« Reply #3 on: Today at 03:45:48 PM »
  "How can one expect a president to shed light on the assassination of another president when he is not even interested in investigating the assassination attempt on himself?"

Candace Owens says President Trump is covering up the truth about the Butler assassination attempt because it was either staged or intended as a warning shot to force him into compliance. Owens says Dan Bongino is in full panic mode as questions continue to grow around the case, calling him a "stone-cold liar."
 
---------------------

Judyth Baker on X yesterday, quote

Judyth Vary Baker
@Judyth
·
Jun 12
My attempts to testify to Luna about Lee Harvey Oswald has resulted in a humungous email effort to STOP me, using old arguments from 20 years ago based on altered emails and misquotes. Desperate to stop me, here's what they are ending to everyone they can think of:
"Judyth Vary Baker...fails on chronology (the Cancún anachronism, met with characteristic blame-shifting), on corroboration (Anna Lewis places her with Oswald while he was in Minsk), and on her sole documentary tether — a Reily Coffee W-2 whose authenticity is contested and which, in any event, ​suggests only co-employment; no contemporaneous Reily co-worker mentions her at all." GOT THAT? Now here are some facts to chew on:
THE CANCUN BRUHAHA
"Judyth Vary Baker ...fails on chronology (the Cancún anachronism, met with characteristic blame-shifting),..."
20 yrs ago, I had not yet located evidence about the real Cancun we planned to visit BEFORE perhaps going to Chichen-Itza. My agent, Peter Cox, thought a "fine hotel" Lee mentioned was on the then-deserted island of Cancun. We had planned to tay at a tiny village called Kankun, certainly no fine hotel.
     For this and other gaffs, such as claiming I'd been sh^t at in Mexico, and had been hiding in Europe, I fired him. My insistence that we KNEW Cancun was called a lie. I insisted that an archeological dig was conducted there in July 1963, which Lee and I saw on exhibit in late August at Tulane' Latin American Library. Lee knew a CIA agent had rented a boat to go there - Dr. Wyllys Andrews -- who said the beach was suitable as an airstrip.  I was finally able to prove the dig and exhibit occurred, and that I knew Cancun was a desert island back in 1963, in 2023 - multiple researchers went in person with me to Tulane' Latin American Library and found the evidence: the dig, the maps, the photos, just as I had described them. I had never even mentioned Cancun until my agent mentioned it, because of course, Lee was ordered back to Dallas and then was framed.
    According to my enemies, I planned to meet Lee at a "fine hotel" at Cancun in 1963. They are shameless liars. The documents proving the dig, maps, etc, were photographed in a documentary June 5, 2026. And I have the name of those who witnessed finding the evidence.

"However, on corroboration (Anna Lewis places her with Oswald while he was in Minsk)..."  36 years later, Anna Lewis, who was filmed without any warning or preparation, remembered seeing Lee Oswald for the first time in 1962. She was off by a year. She spent over 35 minute describing everything else in detail, such as that Lee and I double-dated with her and her husband, David (who is in the JFK record). If anything, missing the date by one year how Anna Lewis wa not coached and had not prepared anything in advance.

THIS LAST ONE IGNORES NEW EVIDENCE:

"and on her sole documentary tether — a Reily Coffee W-2 whose authenticity is contested and which, in any event, ​suggests only co-employment..."

LOL! There are check stubs, bank statements, executive stationery, and now, Lee's time cards I had described which were finally released by the FBI some 12 years ago, which have my initial "J" on 6 of Lee's 11 time cards from Reily.
We were also registered at the A-1 Employment office (there were 6 active and 9 total employment office in New Orleans),
we were hired the same day to work at a tiny Reily sub-company (Standard) where our record were laundered, then transferred together a week later to Reily.

The day Lee was fired, an ad was ordered to replace me,  as our job were together.

I was fired a week early on Aug 9 - the same day Lee was arrested - because I was seen with him.

They are griping that the W2 form I have was forged!

 They wrote:
"...no contemporaneous Reily co-worker mentions her at all."
   That is a lie. My witness is in my book, Lee Harvey Oswald and Me, along with her photo from 1963. Also, a private detective hired by a person still alive interviewed Reily workers who remembered me, but not Lee (he was a maintenance man, I was the Vice President'ss Finance and Security Secretary, quite visible.

 Their 20-year-old accusations were never updated. Besides failing to update, NOT ONE OF MY ACCUSERS EVER CONTACTED ME for information all thee years. They relied on emails that in some cases can be easily seen to have been altered.

I am 83 years old. Most of my supporters who saw my original evidence are now gone. Some of my documents have been stolen. I have suffered injuries, threats and bankruptcy. I have never asked for money for any interview.

Two of my enemieshave recently been added to Rep. Luna' committee. They want to make sure my voice is never heard.

I'm also being muzzled here on X. My information on cancer a a bioweapon, in 1963, using the SV40 Monkey Virus, wasrevealed in 1999. Powerful Big Pharma source don't want me to peak, either.

I am writing this to set the record straight with the public. Lee Harvey Oswald was framed. He was silenced forever in front of 70+ Dallas Police.

THEY WANT ME TO BE SILENCED FOREVER, TOO.

PLEASE HELP PROTECT ME.
PLEAE REPOST THIS. 
 I THANK GOD I AM STILL ABLE TO SPEAK.
Thank you for your time.
God bless you all.

Close quote

How does this prove the Luna Committee is bogus? Just because the committee doesn't think Baker is credible enough to give her time to testify does not make the committee bogus, whether or not you believe Baker's story.

Baker's story seems too pat to me. I'm open to the possibility that part of it may be true, but I have so many doubts about it that I have never cited it in any of my research.

Online John Corbett

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1320
Re: The Luna committee is bogus ...
« Reply #4 on: Today at 04:36:41 PM »
Judyth Vary Baker?

Now there's a blast from the past. Does anyone believe anything that ditz has to say?

Online Mark Ulrik

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 77
Re: The Luna committee is bogus ...
« Reply #5 on: Today at 04:41:36 PM »
[...] Baker's story seems too pat to me. I'm open to the possibility that part of it may be true, but I have so many doubts about it that I have never cited it in any of my research.

The principled restraint of a serious researcher is impressive to behold.