Reasonable Doubts?

[John Corbett]

How could the bullet "tumbling" [ ] and leave such a small hole in JBC's jacket?
This small hole is indicative of a non-rotating bullet.

Or a bullet that had tumbled 180 degrees.

If the bullet was rotating, how could it enter both his wrist and his leg backwards?

Striking the wrist bone could affect the rotation of the bullet.

Why is there zero evidence of a bullet hole in JBC's wristbone? The bone shattered but there was no hole through which a bullet could pass, rotating or not.

When did I say the bullet went through the wrist bone?

[Royell Storing]

Yes, it was traveling backward because that is the only way the lead core could have struck JBC's wrist and deposited the lead fragments there. That is also the only way the base gets flattened as opposed to the nose.

Ballistic gel tests show that a Carcano bullet will start tumbling after exiting from soft tissue which is all CE399 did when it passed through JFK's torso.

   A "Pristine" bullet breaking bones and traveling backward?  That only happens in the "Looney Tunes".   And this in the face of SA Landis finding a bullet in the BACK Seat area of the JFK Limo, which would tie to the shallow JFK BACK Wound?

[John Corbett]

   A "Pristine" bullet breaking bones and traveling backward?  That only happens in the "Looney Tunes".   And this in the face of SA Landis finding a bullet in the BACK Seat area of the JFK Limo, which would tie to the shallow JFK BACK Wound?

The Haag team used sophisticated experiments to show that a Carcano bullet will tumble when exiting soft tissue. You can ignore that if you choose but that doesn't change the fact.

Landis' statement is highly dubious given that there is no record of him saying that during the first six decades following the assassination. Picking up such an important piece of evidence and then just casually setting it down would have been an incredibly stupid thing for him to have done. This screams "false memory" which is a documented phenomenon

[Andrew Mason]

That isn't an "if".

Funny how the WC thought it was.

None of the above "ifs" are mine. You inserted them.

That’s right. You refuse to acknowledge even a possibility that 85+ witnesses might have actually observed what they said they observed. 

[Andrew Mason]

Or a bullet that had tumbled 180 degrees.
Striking the wrist bone could affect the rotation of the bullet.
When did I say the bullet went through the wrist bone?

Ok. So in what non-Newtonian universe does an object impact something hard, not penetrate it, and continue around it rather than deflecting away from it?

[John Corbett]

Ok. So in what non-Newtonian universe does an object impact something hard, not penetrate it, and continue around it rather than deflecting away from it?

I love strawman arguments, When did I say the bullet didn't deflect?

[Royell Storing]

The Haag team used sophisticated experiments to show that a Carcano bullet will tumble when exiting soft tissue. You can ignore that if you choose but that doesn't change the fact.

Landis' statement is highly dubious given that there is no record of him saying that during the first six decades following the assassination. Picking up such an important piece of evidence and then just casually setting it down would have been an incredibly stupid thing for him to have done. This screams "false memory" which is a documented phenomenon

   Knott Lab put the SBT to bed with FORENSIC SCIENCE that is routinely admitted in courts across this country. "Hagg team" and "experiments"?