Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Passing of Former HSCA Chief Counsel G. Robert Blakey  (Read 1236 times)

Online Michael T. Griffith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1638
    • JFK Assassination Website
Re: Passing of Former HSCA Chief Counsel G. Robert Blakey
« Reply #14 on: June 05, 2026, 02:25:07 PM »
As you listen to Blakey's interview with Rosenberg, you will hear how passionate he was about the case for conspiracy. He was certain that JFK was killed by a conspiracy, that there was a grassy knoll gunman, that Ruby shot Oswald on orders from the Mafia, and that the lone-gunman theory was untenable. However, you would never know this to read the scathing, draconian attacks on Blakey made by ultra-liberal conspiracy theorists, such as Joan Mellen and Len Osanic.

In his interview with Rosenberg, Blakey said that it was "a possibility" that some CIA-trained anti-Castro Cubans and some of their CIA handlers were involved in the assassination and that there were some "deeply suspicious circumstances" involving those individuals. But, Blakey did not believe the evidence established this scenario beyond the point of suspicion.

Blakey believed that the only scenario that was established beyond the point of suspicion was the Mafia scenario, and for this he was excoriated by both ultra-liberal conspiracy theorists and Warren Commission apologists.

Thankfully, there have been and still are plenty of pro-conspiracy JFKA researchers who are not ultra-liberal and/or who do not buy into the 9/11 Truther craziness and who do not rely on L. Fletcher Prouty's crackpot claims. These researchers include Jeff Sundberg, David Scheim, Anthony Summers, David Mantik, Harold Weisberg, Greg Doudna, Mark Shaw, Richard Mahoney, John H. Davis, Seth Kantor, Gary Cornwell, Stewart Galanor, Gaeton Fonzi, and Lamar Waldron, to name a few.

Once again, here are the links to Blakey's two-part interview with Rosenberg:

(part 1)
(part 2)

Online John Corbett

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1402
Re: Passing of Former HSCA Chief Counsel G. Robert Blakey
« Reply #15 on: June 05, 2026, 02:33:00 PM »
As you listen to Blakey's interview with Rosenberg, you will hear how passionate he was about the case for conspiracy.


Passion does not equate to correctness. There are people who are passionately wrong about many things. I see examples of that every day on this forum.

What I don't ever see from these passionate CTs is credible evidence to support their beliefs.

Online Michael T. Griffith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1638
    • JFK Assassination Website
Re: Passing of Former HSCA Chief Counsel G. Robert Blakey
« Reply #16 on: Today at 04:31:35 PM »
Another thing that Blakey's pro-conspiracy critics overlook is that Blakey could only go as far as the committee would let him go. The committee members were the ones who had the final say on the conduct of the investigation, on the wording of the final report, and on which documents were sealed and which were not.

For example, the Final Draft Report, which Blakey approved, then underwent revision, including by the CIA. The final published version watered down many valid statements in the Final Draft Report. For instance, the Final Draft Report said the following about the evidence of Mafia involvement:

There is solid evidence that Hoffa, Marcello, and Trafficante — three of the most important targets for criminal prosecution by the Kennedy administration — had discussions with their subordinates about murdering President Kennedy. Associates of Hoffa, Trafficante, and Marcello were in direct contact with Jack Ruby, the Dallas nightclub owner who killed the "lone assassin" of the president. (Final Draft Report, HSCA, p. 274)

This was a perfectly valid, factual statement, as many scholars have proved (e.g., Dr. Richard Mahoney, Dr. David Kaiser, Dr. David Scheim, and Lamar Waldron). But, this blunt statement did not make it into the published report.

Because the committee members could not stomach a fifth shot and a third gunman, Blakey insisted that the apparent gunshot impulse pattern at 140.3 on the dictabelt be ruled a false alarm, even though it passed the echo-delay matching test, and even though 8 of its 10 impulses matched the impulses of one of the Dealey Plaza test shots.

The problem was that this impulse pattern occurs 1.05 seconds after the 139.27 impulse pattern, and the alleged murder weapon simply could not have been fired that quickly. Thus, this shot would have had to be fired by another gunman shooting from behind (possibly from the nearby Dal-Tex Building or from another window on the sixth floor, keeping in mind that several witnesses reported seeing two men on the sixth floor shortly before the shooting).