Video: Hoffman Hill & Oliver

[John Mytton]

Is it more appropriate to give the First Lady some beautiful flowers or a hand puppet toy? Now I can imagine some exceptions like a cute Koala in Australia.

To me, the size and shape fits flowers and besides there's nothing that looks like legs or arms.





JohnM

[Royell Storing]

Is it more appropriate to give the First Lady some beautiful flowers or a hand puppet toy? Now I can imagine some exceptions like a cute Koala in Australia.

To me, the size and shape fits flowers and besides there's nothing that looks like legs or arms.





JohnM

      "The hand is quicker than the eye".  Seeing this frame-by-frame tells the tale. There are numerous versions of "Lamb Chop". Some do Not have a body. No legs or arms.

[John Mytton]

      "The hand is quicker than the eye".  Seeing this frame-by-frame tells the tale. There are numerous versions of "Lamb Chop". Some do Not have a body. No legs or arms.

Two Screen grabs @29:25 with highlighted FLOWERS!




Since the video you linked had sections that were poor quality with blown out whites, here's  the same again with a little less brightness.




JohnM

[Lance Payette]

Ya gotta admit, this Lamb Chop thing is the most interesting factoid that has surfaced in months, maybe years. If a passable Lamb Chop is not in the new Mafia-oriented movie, I for one am going to have serious issues with its authenticity. I could accept a Garfield substitute if that's all they could find at the Manitoba Walmart, but nothing less.

[John Corbett]

Ya gotta admit, this Lamb Chop thing is the most interesting factoid that has surfaced in months, maybe years. If a passable Lamb Chop is not in the new Mafia-oriented movie, I for one am going to have serious issues with its authenticity. I could accept a Garfield substitute if that's all they could find at the Manitoba Walmart, but nothing less.

This whole thing about Lamb Chop is much ado about nothing. Obviously, there was something in that backseat that Jean Hill mistook for a small dog. No big deal. What difference does it make what that was.

[Royell Storing]

Two Screen grabs @29:25 with highlighted FLOWERS!




Since the video you linked had sections that were poor quality with blown out whites, here's  the same again with a little less brightness.




JohnM

   Hey John - I pinpointed 29:30. You obviously prefer 29:25, for reasons of your own.  29:30 clearly shows Lamb Chop's: (1) BLACK Nose, (2) BLACK Eyes, (3) FLOPPY Ear, and (4) Dimpled/Wool FUR. To your credit, You always do very Detailed Image work. This is why your avoidance of 29:30 says much.

[Royell Storing]

This whole thing about Lamb Chop is much ado about nothing. Obviously, there was something in that backseat that Jean Hill mistook for a small dog. No big deal. What difference does it make what that was.

     It is Not just the Jean Hill ID of a small dog/ "Lamb Chop" the hand puppet all by itself that matters. It is that Jean Hill DID see DOWN INSIDE the JFK Limo from her vantage point on the (S) side of Elm St. And, JFK DID fall onto the backseat of the car. JFK's head being generally pointed in Hill's direction as he fell onto the same backseat that the Lamb Chop hand puppet was laying on. Specifically, the JFK (R) Temple Wound would have been exposed to her eye as he fell onto that backseat. This is yet another JFK Assassination eyewitness that held value in an important unexplored area. Both then, and just as You are doing Now.  Jean Hill seeing that small "Lamb Chop" hand puppet on the backseat, means she could have seen much, much, more inside the JFK Limo. Whether she, (or you), realized it.
     If you seriously want to solve this case, you gotta think outside of the box. You continue treading water 62+ years later