JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
The All-Important Curtain Rods
John Mytton:
--- Quote from: Martin Weidmann on April 17, 2026, 11:04:09 PM ---I believe it was a white lie to avoid having to tell a 19 years old co-worker that he was really going to try and save his marriage.
--- End quote ---
Sure it's common knowledge that he was trying to save his marriage, but why Thursday?
If he stuck to his standard procedure he could have gone on Friday, taken his dirty clothes and made his slave Marina do his washing, he'd have a whole two days to spend with his kids and he'd have a whole two days to spend with Marina because when you're in love you want to spend as much time with your loved one as possible.
But Thursday gave him no chance to have his clothes washed, hardly any time with his kids and only a few hours to try and fix his marriage.
So it's clear, as every informed Scholar has said since day 1, Oswald's second plan after his failure to reconnect with Marina, was to get his rifle and there's no getting around that and long after we are all gone, this truth which was proved by the WC and then HSCA will be forever enshrined in the history of the World!! Get use to it!
JohnM
Martin Weidmann:
--- Quote from: John Mytton on April 18, 2026, 01:40:52 AM ---Sure it's common knowledge that he was trying to save his marriage, but why Thursday?
If he stuck to his standard procedure he could have gone on Friday, taken his dirty clothes and made his slave Marina do his washing, he'd have a whole two days to spend with his kids and he'd have a whole two days to spend with Marina because when you're in love you want to spend as much time with your loved one as possible.
But Thursday gave him no chance to have his clothes washed, hardly any time with his kids and only a few hours to try and fix his marriage.
So it's clear, as every informed Scholar has said since day 1, Oswald's second plan after his failure to reconnect with Marina, was to get his rifle and there's no getting around that and long after we are all gone, this truth which was proved by the WC and then HSCA will be forever enshrined in the history of the World!! Get use to it!
JohnM
--- End quote ---
This is a prime example how enough assumptions can make any person guilty of anything.
David Von Pein:
--- Quote from: Martin Weidmann on April 18, 2026, 01:17:26 AM ---This is what a post by a pathetic fanatic looks like.
--- End quote ---
No, it's what a post looks like that was written by someone (John Corbett) who actually knows how to properly and sensibly assess and evaluate the evidence in the JFK case.
Incredibly, though, many conspiracy theorists seem to think that ALL OF THIS WEALTH OF EVIDENCE can actually exist in the JFK and Tippit murder cases and yet still end up with Lee Oswald being innocent of shooting anyone on 11/22/63.
But reasonable and sensible people who live here in the World of Reality just can't stretch their imaginations nearly that far. Because people like John Corbett and I prefer to remain in this universe of reality instead of wandering into the CT world of fantasy, wild speculation, and tons of planted evidence and coerced witnesses.
Martin Weidmann:
--- Quote from: David Von Pein on April 18, 2026, 03:04:02 AM ---No, it's what a post looks like that was written by someone (John Corbett) who actually knows how to properly and sensibly assess and evaluate the evidence in the JFK case.
Incredibly, though, many conspiracy theorists seem to think that ALL OF THIS WEALTH OF EVIDENCE can actually exist in the JFK and Tippit murder cases and yet still end up with Lee Oswald being innocent of shooting anyone on 11/22/63.
But reasonable and sensible people who live here in the World of Reality just can't stretch their imaginations nearly that far. Because people like John Corbett and I prefer to remain in this universe of reality instead of wandering into the CT world of fantasy, wild speculation, and tons of planted evidence and coerced witnesses.
--- End quote ---
Isn't it remarkable that even the biggest fool considers himself to be a reasonable and sensible person.
Corbett is making a big issue of the fact that Oswald went to Irving on Thursday instead of Friday, but he hasn't got a clue what was going through Oswald's mind.
He hasn't got a shred of evidence to show there was a rifle stored in Ruth Paine's garage on 11/21/63. He merely assumes there was.
He has a heavy duty bag with a partial print on it, made and found at the TSBD but he can not prove that bag ever left the TSBD or was carried by Oswald holding a rifle. He merely assumes it was.
He ignores the fact that the best witness who saw the bag passed a polygraph while dismissing the heavy duty bag as the one he saw. What he did see was a flimpsy bag that Oswald carried in the cup of his hand and under his armpit.
So, without a shred of evidence he jumps to conclusions while dismissing the testimony of a witness that contradicts him.
And then you have the audacity to claim he is "properly and sensibly assessing and evaluating the evidence". Pathetic!
David Von Pein:
Question for Martin W.:
From your own personal point-of-view (i.e., as a person who has great doubts about the guilt of Lee Harvey Oswald) .... do you think it's possible to come up with a "reasonable and sensible" scenario that explains every piece of evidence in the JFK and Tippit cases WITHOUT having to resort to any of the things I mentioned in my last post?
Those things being: Fantasy, wild speculation, and tons of planted evidence and coerced witnesses.
Good luck in your efforts. For I don't think it's even remotely possible to accomplish that task.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version