Gov. John Connally Grips His White Stetson Hat at Z-272

[Michael Capasse]

Nutter's know how to weigh evidence and determine what is probative and what is not. Eye and earwitness testimony that conflicts with what we see in the Z-film is not at all probative.

Actually, Nutters know how to cherry-pick witness statements and ignore other corroborating accounts.
  it is necessary to get to their phony preset conclusion. 

[John Corbett]

Actually, Nutters know how to cherry-pick witness statements and ignore other corroborating accounts.
  it is necessary to get to their phony preset conclusion. 

For the most part,  Nutters don't rely on fallible human witnesses and instead look at the hard evidence which clearly points to Oswald as the lone gunman. There is no hard evidence of any other shooter from any other location.  Witnesses have some value but only to the extent their accounts can be corroborated by the hard evidence. If one were to rely on witnesses to tell them what happened, it would be easy to construct a dozen or more scenarios depending on which witnesses one chooses to believe. The assassination only happened one way and the hard evidence tells us what that one way was. 

[Michael Capasse]

For the most part,  Nutters don't rely on fallible human witnesses and instead look at the hard evidence which clearly points to Oswald as the lone gunman. There is no hard evidence of any other shooter from any other location.  Witnesses have some value but only to the extent their accounts can be corroborated by the hard evidence. If one were to rely on witnesses to tell them what happened, it would be easy to construct a dozen or more scenarios depending on which witnesses one chooses to believe. The assassination only happened one way and the hard evidence tells us what that one way was.

IOW; we pick and choose the statement that serves us best

[John Corbett]

IOW; we pick and choose the statement that serves us best

The case against Oswald can be made on the forensic evidence alone without a single eyewitness.

If I were to use an eyewitness, only one is needed, Zapruder's camera. It has perfect recall.

[Michael Capasse]

The case against Oswald can be made on the forensic evidence alone without a single eyewitness.

Your opinion. Good to know

[Andrew Mason]

The case against Oswald can be made on the forensic evidence alone without a single eyewitness.

If I were to use an eyewitness, only one is needed, Zapruder's camera. It has perfect recall.

One doesn't need Zapruder's camera to make the case against Oswald.  If Zapruder's camera had sound it would have perfect recall.  Besides, you are relying on witnesses to support an early missed shot.  The zfilm does not show that.