Would Oswald have been convicted?

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
Benjamin Cole, John Corbett

Author Topic: Would Oswald have been convicted?  (Read 316 times)

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3482
Re: Would Oswald have been convicted?
« Reply #8 on: Today at 12:01:02 AM »
You say stupid things like this, exposing you unhealthy obsession with the KGB, and still expect people to consider you to be of sound mind. Hilarious!

Dear Martin,

What's ironic is that you, like me, are anti-Trump, but you don't realize that "former" KGB counterintelligence officer Vladimir Putin installed him as our "president" on 20 January 2017 so that he could wittingly or unwittingly tear us apart, and did so as a final step of a process that began in 1959 when the Kremlin realized that the USSR and the Warsaw Pact couldn't defeat the U.S. and NATO militarily.

One step of said process was its publishing an anti-CIA / anti-Clay Shaw article in a Communist-owned Italian newspaper three days after overly ambitious, scandal-plagued, and revengeful Jim Garrison arrested Shaw on suspicion of organizing a homosexual "thrill-kill" assassination of JFK.

Which eventually led, of course, to Comrade Oliver Stone's 1991 self-described mythological ("to counter the myth of the Warren Report") film, "JFK."

How many times have you watched it, now?

Sad!

-- Tom

PS Anyone who is interested in learning more about the KGB's 1959 "Master Plan" can go to Substack (for free!) and read my 500-plus (free!) articles at my page, "How the KGB Zombified the CIA and the FBI."

At last count, about 1,500 people are "following" me there.
« Last Edit: Today at 12:35:09 AM by Tom Graves »

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8081
Re: Would Oswald have been convicted?
« Reply #9 on: Today at 12:28:13 AM »
Dear Martin,

What's ironic is that you, like me, are anti-Trump, but you don't realize that "former" KGB counterintelligence officer Vladimir Putin installed him as our "president" on 20 January 2017 so that he could wittingly or unwittingly tear us apart, and did so as a final step of a process that began in 1959 when the Kremlin realized that the USSR and the Warsaw Pact couldn't defeat the U.S. and NATO militarily.

One step of said process was its publishing an anti-CIA / anti-Clay Shaw article in a Communist-owned Italian newspaper three days after overly ambitious, scandal-plagued, and revengeful Jim Garrison arrested Shaw on suspicion of organizing a homosexual "thrill-kill" assassination of JFK.

Which eventually led, of course, to Comrade Oliver Stone's 1991 self-described mythological ("to counter the myth of the Warren Report") film, "JFK."

How many times have you watched it, now?

Sad!

-- Tom

What's ironic is that you, like me, are anti-Trump, but you don't realize that "former" KGB counterintelligence officer Vladimir Putin installed him as our "president" on 20 January 2017

Does Russia meddle in elections in other countries? Sure they do, but so does the USA. Like it or not, that's just the way it is. If you want to be paranoid about it, then be paranoid. At my age, I couldn't care less. As far as I am concerned this world has been on a self destruct course for many years and things will get worse before they get better. In fact, you don't need the Russians to f*ck up the world or even the country. All you need to do is leave it to the corrupt politicians and their special interest groups.

Trump isn't only a complete idiot; he's also a the biggest threat for world peace, but no matter who you want to blame at the end of the day millions of American idiots voted him into power, so if you want to blame somebody, blame them.

Which eventually led, of course, to Comrade Oliver Stone's 1991 self-described mythological ("to counter the myth of the Warren Report") film, "JFK."

How many times have you watched it, now?


Never! I saw parts of it, but it doesn't interest me, just like I am not interested in the Parkland Hospital movie and all the other fiction they put out there.

In my flower power days I might have cared about making the world a better place and worry about BS like this, but believe me _ you should try it - when you grow up you will see more clearly than even that nothing of substance will ever change for the better.

The aboriginals were right when they compared two countries combating for power to two fleas fighting over who owns the dog that they live on. It's pathetic!


« Last Edit: Today at 12:48:11 AM by Martin Weidmann »

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3482
Re: Would Oswald have been convicted?
« Reply #10 on: Today at 12:37:19 AM »
Dear Martin,

What's ironic is that you, like me, are anti-Trump, but you don't realize that "former" KGB counterintelligence officer Vladimir Putin installed him as our "president" on 20 January 2017 so that he could wittingly or unwittingly tear us apart, and did so as a final step of a process that began in 1959 when the Kremlin realized that the USSR and the Warsaw Pact couldn't defeat the U.S. and NATO militarily.

One step of said process was its publishing an anti-CIA / anti-Clay Shaw article in a Communist-owned Italian newspaper three days after overly ambitious, scandal-plagued, and revengeful Jim Garrison arrested Shaw on suspicion of organizing a homosexual "thrill-kill" assassination of JFK.

Which eventually led, of course, to Comrade Oliver Stone's 1991 self-described mythological ("to counter the myth of the Warren Report") film, "JFK."

How many times have you watched it, now?

Sad!

-- Tom

PS Anyone who is interested in learning more about the KGB's 1959 "Master Plan" can go to Substack (for free!) and read my 500-plus (free!) articles at my page, "How the KGB Zombified the CIA and the FBI."

At last count, about 1,500 people were "following" me there.


Edited and bumped for gullible Martin Weidmann (and others who might be interested).
« Last Edit: Today at 12:39:01 AM by Tom Graves »

Online Benjamin Cole

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 546
Re: Would Oswald have been convicted?
« Reply #11 on: Today at 12:54:10 AM »
Maybe, probably.

One might wonder if a criminal court proceeding, while necessary for justice, is the right mechanism to determine who (if anyone) was behind or colluded with LHO on 11.22.

LBJ was deeply committed to avoiding a nuke war with Russia, fearing LHO-KGB or G2 links. A reasonable enough concern.

State Department careers, including that of the Ambassador to Mexico, were ruined for even wanting to pursue LHO-G2 connections.

The WC was committed to the LN narrative from its creation.

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8081
Re: Would Oswald have been convicted?
« Reply #12 on: Today at 12:57:49 AM »
Maybe, probably.

One might wonder if a criminal court proceeding, while necessary for justice, is the right mechanism to determine who (if anyone) was behind or colluded with LHO on 11.22.

LBJ was deeply committed to avoiding a nuke war with Russia, fearing LHO-KGB or G2 links. A reasonable enough concern.

State Department careers, including that of the Ambassador to Mexico, were ruined for even wanting to pursue LHO-G2 connections.

The WC was committed to the LN narrative from its creation.

The WC was committed to the LN narrative from its creation.

Exactly right! The WC report was a political document and not the result of a honest and thorough investigation.

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3482
Re: Would Oswald have been convicted?
« Reply #13 on: Today at 01:00:42 AM »
Maybe, probably.

One might wonder if a criminal court proceeding, while necessary for justice, is the right mechanism to determine who (if anyone) was behind or colluded with LHO on 11.22.

LBJ was deeply committed to avoiding a nuke war with Russia, fearing LHO-KGB or G2 links. A reasonable enough concern.

State Department careers, including that of the Ambassador to Mexico, were ruined for even wanting to pursue LHO-G2 connections.

The WC was committed to the LN narrative from its creation.

Am I correct in assuming that your conclusion that the assassination was a conspiracy is based on "Flash-bang in the bushes!," "The entry wound to JBC's wrist was on its dorsal side!," and "The three (or four!) shots covered only [fill in the blank] seconds!"?

Online Benjamin Cole

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 546
Re: Would Oswald have been convicted?
« Reply #14 on: Today at 01:26:29 AM »
TG-

You are incorrect that I conclude there was a JFKA CT.

I suspect there was.

Yes, the GK smoke-and-bang show suggests someone conspired with LHO, who I suspect was the TSBD6 sniper.

The smell of gunsmoke was heavy in DP in the immediate aftermath of the JFKA, but the breeze was blowing from the Third St. Overpass to the TSBD. So LHO's M-C was not the source of that gunsmoke.

The entry wound to the dorsal (wristwatch) side of JBC's wrist is inexplicable---so said JBC's surgeon, Dr. Shaw. The doctor had worked on 700 wartime bullet-shot victims. 

Yes, it appears to me JBC is shot ~Z-295. Do the math.

So we are on different pages on this one.

So what? That is what a forum is for.

LBJ wanted to, and nearly did, entirely suffocate investigations into LHO's KGB-G2 ties.

No nuke war with Russia...a reasonable-enough caution.


Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3482
Re: Would Oswald have been convicted?
« Reply #15 on: Today at 01:48:19 AM »
TG-

You are incorrect that I conclude there was a JFKA CT.

I suspect there was.

Yes, the GK smoke-and-bang show suggests someone conspired with LHO, who I suspect was the TSBD6 sniper.

The smell of gunsmoke was heavy in DP in the immediate aftermath of the JFKA, but the breeze was blowing from the Third St. Overpass to the TSBD. So LHO's M-C was not the source of that gunsmoke.

The entry wound to the dorsal (wristwatch) side of JBC's wrist is inexplicable---so said JBC's surgeon, Dr. Shaw. The doctor had worked on 700 wartime bullet-shot victims. 

Yes, it appears to me JBC is shot ~Z-295. Do the math.

So we are on different pages on this one.

So what? That is what a forum is for.

LBJ wanted to, and nearly did, entirely suffocate investigations into LHO's KGB-G2 ties.

No nuke war with Russia...a reasonable-enough caution.

The problem is, only three shots were fired, the first shot missed everything half-a-second before Zapruder resumed filming, and the second shot struck both JFK and JBC at approximately Z-222.