JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
The Brown Paper Bag
Martin Weidmann:
Answers do indeed destroy narratives. That's why LNs don't answer critical questions.
In the past 20 years I have met only one LN who had the cojones to agree that certain claims in the WC reports were not supported by evidence and that certain parts of the narrative were extremely problematic. He died a few years ago but I still miss our open and honest discussions. Too bad there are not more LNs like him. Instead I'm dealing with a bunch of lying, dishonest weasels who are desperately trying to defend the indefensible.
Royell Storing:
--- Quote from: Martin Weidmann on April 17, 2026, 11:05:04 PM ---Answers do indeed destroy narratives. That's why LNs don't answer critical questions.
In the past 20 years I have met only one LN who had the cojones to agree that certain claims in the WC reports were not supported by evidence and that certain parts of the narrative were extremely problematic. He died a few years ago but I still miss our open and honest discussions. Too bad there are not more LNs like him. Instead I'm dealing with a bunch of lying, dishonest weasels who are desperately trying to defend the indefensible.
--- End quote ---
These LN's are stuck now. All they can do is make stuff up whenever they are forced into the jackpot. I got a card carrying LN now claiming Officer Haygood made 2 separate trips into the railroad yard. I got another claiming Amos Euins was Not loaded into Inspector Sawyer's car until 1:00 PM. Jam 'em up and they immediately rewrite 62+ yr old history on-the-spot. They rely on people Not knowing to begin with or having forgotten over the course of time. Not happening with some of us still ready to get in their grill.
Martin Weidmann:
--- Quote from: Royell Storing on April 17, 2026, 11:26:32 PM --- These LN's are stuck now. All they can do is make stuff up whenever they are forced into the jackpot. I got a card carrying LN now claiming Officer Haygood made 2 separate trips into the railroad yard. I got another claiming Amos Euins was Not loaded into Inspector Sawyer's car until 1:00 PM. Jam 'em up and they immediately rewrite 62+ yr old history on-the-spot. They rely on people Not knowing to begin with or having forgotten over the course of time. Not happening with some of us still ready to get in their grill.
--- End quote ---
They rely on people Not knowing to begin with or having forgotten over the course of time.
Royell, in other discussion I don't agree with you, but in this case you are absolutely right.
I have tried to figure out what would cause that level of determination to misrepresent and lie about evidence and make stuff up in a 6 decades old case the general public nowadays hasn't got a clue and doesn't give a damn about. One would think it should be possible to have a normal discussion with those creeps, but for some reason they keep defending an indefensible case.
John Corbett:
--- Quote from: Martin Weidmann on April 17, 2026, 11:05:04 PM ---Answers do indeed destroy narratives. That's why LNs don't answer critical questions.
In the past 20 years I have met only one LN who had the cojones to agree that certain claims in the WC reports were not supported by evidence
--- End quote ---
Such as...
--- Quote ---and that certain parts of the narrative were extremely problematic.
--- End quote ---
Such as...
[quote[
He died a few years ago but I still miss our open and honest discussions. Too bad there are not more LNs like him. Instead I'm dealing with a bunch of lying, dishonest weasels who are desperately trying to defend the indefensible.
[/quote]
Projecting again.
Martin Weidmann:
I repeat;
One would think it should be possible to have a normal discussion with those creeps, but for some reason they keep defending an indefensible case.
Evidence has just been provided by one of the creeps. Gotta love their ignorance! :D
And here's some more;
This idiot claimed that I had made up evidence out of thin air, so I showed him the evidence by posting two of the reports (there are more!) and schooled him.
He admitted he had been wrong but did not apologize. Instead he started to argue about the word "panicked" I had used while expressing my opinion and this vile creature instantly claimed I had lied, by simply expressing my opinion. And why did he do that? Because the creep disagreed in his opinion with the use of the word "panicked".
Now, just how sick is that?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version