JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
The Brown Paper Bag
John Corbett:
--- Quote from: Martin Weidmann on April 17, 2026, 08:00:31 PM ---All valid questions which are kryptonite for the die hard LNs.
--- End quote ---
It might look like kryptonite to you but it is really just Silly Putty.
Zeon Mason:
--- Quote from: John Corbett on April 17, 2026, 08:22:13 PM ---It might look like kryptonite to you but it is really just Silly Putty.
--- End quote ---
I just wanted to know the names of the persons whom found the bag and the jacket?
And maybe clean up the WC narrative so it is more understandable to some of the other skeptics like Martin, Micheal C , Royell and ME too LOL.
Strange we have 2 lefties and 2 Trumpers whom
Are agreeing that there’s something amiss about the WC theory.
Martin Weidmann:
--- Quote from: Zeon Mason on April 17, 2026, 09:49:52 PM ---I just wanted to know the names of the persons whom found the bag and the jacket?
And maybe clean up the WC narrative so it is more understandable to some of the other skeptics like Martin, Micheal C , Royell and ME too LOL.
Strange we have 2 lefties and 2 Trumpers whom
Are agreeing that there’s something amiss about the WC theory.
--- End quote ---
LNs are never going to answer a question that could destroy their narrative.
The only person who saw Oswald leaving the rooming house allegedly wearing a jacket is Earlene Roberts. She was wrong about everything else but when it comes to the jacket the LNs believe her without question. I asked Bill Brown what made Roberts so special that she should be believed he refused to answer.
On the other hand, Frazier saw Oswald carry the flimsy paper bag in the cup of his hand and under his armpit and the LNs are falling all over themselves by desperately trying to discredit Frazier in every way they can imagine.
Frazier had 20/20 vision, Roberts didn't, Frazier saw Oswald for a longer period of time, Roberts only saw him a couple of seconds as he left the house.
Frazier took a polygraph and passed, Roberts was described by her employer as somebody who made up stories.
Frazier was able to describe the bag he had seen, Roberts was unable to describe anything accurate about the jacket.
And yet, according to the LNs Frazier is unreliable and mistaken and Roberts is spot on and 100% believable.
In what universe does that even make sense?
John Corbett:
--- Quote from: Zeon Mason on April 17, 2026, 09:49:52 PM ---I just wanted to know the names of the persons whom found the bag and the jacket?
And maybe clean up the WC narrative so it is more understandable to some of the other skeptics like Martin, Micheal C , Royell and ME too LOL.
Strange we have 2 lefties and 2 Trumpers whom
Are agreeing that there’s something amiss about the WC theory.
--- End quote ---
I have never found a correlation between one's political POV and their POV about the question of conspiracy. There are both LNs and CTs all across the political spectrum. I don't see how one's political leanings should influence whether or not they believe JFK died as a result of a conspiracy. The CTs might be influenced as to who they think the bad guys are but the LNs have no such problem. We know Oswald did it. We see zero compelling evidence that he had any help.
John Corbett:
--- Quote from: Martin Weidmann on April 17, 2026, 10:05:30 PM ---LNs are never going to answer a question that could destroy their narrative.
--- End quote ---
Questions don't destroy narratives. Answers do. All the CTs have ever been able to do is raise questions. They never seem to have any answers. At least no the right ones.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version