After 60+ Years in the JFKA Snipe Hunt: Monika Wiesak?

[Benjamin Cole]

Monika Wiesak has authored a couple of blah-blah books in the JFKA, echoing the earlier leftist, inaccurate, skewed tome by John Douglass.

I happen to be a JFK fan, and regard him as America's best public speaker in the postwar era. JFK was also an ardent anti-communist, and wanted the world to migrate to Western liberal democratic government, especially the former colonies.

Wiesak "adds" to Douglass' twisted JFK history by suggesting Mossad waxed JFK---that is the hip thing today in certain demented leftist JFKA circles. 

But who is Wiesak? Who finances her work?

One clue is the squalid posthumous hagiography Wiesak recently authored on the pederast Michael Jackson. Yes, Michael Jackson, the celebrity singer who pegged boys.

This is the blurb Wiesak wrote on her book on Jackson:

Michael Jackson was globally famous yet misunderstood by many. He was loved by his fans and demonized by the corporate press. He became famous at a young age and soared to superstardom as a young adult. As he matured, so did his music. He sang of unity, peace, and harmony, and against war and injustice. He created his beloved Neverland Ranch to serve as a healing escape for others. As the years went on, the press attacks grew more vicious. Then, the molestation allegations began. The media spoke of the accusations as if copious evidence backed them up. However, a closer look reveals that they fall apart under scrutiny.

This book details the story of Michael Jackson, from his youth through long past his death. It explores the false rumors spread over the years and sheds light on who the man truly was. It also offers a revealing look at the world of power, media, and entertainment.

Wiesak wrote this book in 2024. No excuses, the book did not precede any revelations on Jackson.

"He (Jackson) sang of unity, peace, and harmony, and against war and injustice."--Wiesak.

Egads. This is embarrassing.

A good bet is Wiesak was given an advance by parties trying to rehabilitate the Jackson name, and gain some extra mileage out of the Jackson catalog.

In Wiesak's world, pederasts are admirable, and Mossad waxed JFK.

That is state of $-JFKA research.

[Tom Graves]

Monika Wiesak has authored a couple of blah-blah books in the JFKA, echoing the earlier leftist, inaccurate, skewed tome by John Douglass.

I happen to be a JFK fan, and regard him as America's best public speaker in the postwar era. JFK was also an ardent anti-communist, and wanted the world to migrate to Western liberal democratic government, especially the former colonies.

Wiesak "adds" to Douglass' twisted JFK history by suggesting Mossad waxed JFK---that is the hip thing today in certain demented leftist JFKA circles. 

Maybe the KGB* encourages people like Wiesak to blame the JFKA on Mossad, because in so doing they are wittingly or unwittingly framing the CIA's "Israeli Account" holder, James JESUS Angleton, as the evil, evil mastermind, when in fact Angleton was duped by a probable KGB mole by the name of Bruce Leonard Solie (look him up), whom John M. Newman tells us in his 2022 book, Uncovering Popov's Mole, not only "cleared" false defector Yuri Nosenko in October 1968 but very likely sent Lee Harvey Oswald to Moscow in 1959 as an ostensible "dangle" in a planned-to-fail mole hunt in the wrong part of the CIA -- the Soviet Russia Division.

*Today's SVR and FSB

[Benjamin Cole]

TG-

I have little doubt Putin and Tehran money is active in JFKA social influencer circles, and funding book projects and the like.

The $links between Putin and Oliver Stone are no secret. 

The Hunt Letter was exposed, and as you accurately point out, elements within the CIA sure look like they were compromised by the KGB, including possibly LHO (says John Newman).

LHO leads to G2-KGB, like links to anyone, were snuffed out by the WC.

Wiesak sure looks like a pen-for-hire.

If only the US would appease dictators globally, then there were be worldwide peace.

Here is Wiesak pimping for Jackson music sales, a recent post on "X."

[Tom Graves]

TG-

I have little doubt Putin and Tehran money is active in JFKA social influencer circles, and funding book projects and the like.

The $links between Putin and Oliver Stone are no secret. 

The Hunt Letter was exposed, and as you accurately point out, elements within the CIA sure look like they were compromised by the KGB, including possibly LHO (says John Newman).

LHO leads to G2-KGB, like links to anyone, were snuffed out by the WC.

Wiesak sure looks like a pen-for-hire.

If only the US would appease dictators globally, then there were be worldwide peace.

Is it just my imagination, or do lots of Angleton-blaming / CIA-blaming tinfoil-hat JFKA conspiracy theorists have . . . gasp . . . Jewish names?

[Benjamin Cole]

TG--

No doubt, some do.

But James DiEugenio?

Monika Wiesak is a recent migrant from Poland, where there are few, few Jews (Poles are great people, btw). 

Jefferson Morley?

Tucker Carlson?

Michael Piper?

Laurent Guyénot (French anti-Semitic crackpot, published in Unz website).

And the most lurid, pinheaded loser of the bunch, Dr Bill "The Quack" Niederhut?

Unz is Jewish, by birth.

I heard said, "Unz may be ashamed to be Jewish, but we are even more ashamed that he is."

[Tom Graves]

TG--

No doubt, some do.

But James DiEugenio?

Monika Wiesak is a recent migrant from Poland, where there are few, few Jews (Poles are great people, btw). 

Jefferson Morley?

Tucker Carlson?

Michael Piper?

Laurent Guyénot (French anti-Semitic crackpot, published in Unz website).

And the most lurid, pinheaded loser of the bunch, Dr Bill "The Quack" Niederhut?

Unz is Jewish, by birth.

I heard said, "Unz may be ashamed to be Jewish, but we are even more ashamed that he is."

Dear "BC,"

Regardless, do you think January 6 was a Deep State op against Trump?

-- "TG"

[Benjamin Cole]

TG-

No. AFAIK, not a Deep State action.

Ray Epps is a mysterious guy, and the fact that Mr Buffalo Horns was solicitously ushered around the US Capital was odd. Great photo ops, no? 

The Oath Keepers and Proud Boys were heavily infiltrated by feds.

Evidently, there were 200+feds in the crowd on Jan. 6, and Capitol Police at one point mysteriously stood down, and allowed the crowd into the Capitol. None of that makes sense.

Maybe Jan 6 was just a scrum. Maybe just bad decisions made everywhere.

The Donk-run Jan. 6 committee was a kangaroo court show trial.

I have suspicions about Trump's relations to Putin, but nothing solid.

It should be noted Trump has kneecapped Putin in Cuba, Venezuela and Iran. Even while Putin has exhausted his military in Ukraine, with the US supporting Ukraine through Europe.

With luck, we could see the IRGC and Putin go down this year.

Let's ask Monika Wiesak what to think. She says Michael Jackson's pederasty is not important. Jackson sang songs about social justice.

[Tom Graves]

[...]

ME: Is the following statement true? "There were 200-plus federal agents in the crowd on Jan. 6, and the Capitol Police at one point mysteriously stood down and allowed the crowd into the Capitol."

GROK: No, the statement is not accurate as phrased. It combines elements of documented facts, exaggerations, and unproven implications into a misleading claim.

Federal Agents in the Crowd

There is no credible evidence of "200-plus federal agents" embedded in the crowd on January 6, 2021, acting as provocateurs or undercover operatives during the initial breach. A December 2024 Justice Department Inspector General (DOJ OIG) report found that the FBI had no undercover employees in the protest crowds or at the Capitol that day.

pbs.org

The same report documented 26 FBI confidential human sources (informants, not agents) in Washington, D.C., in connection with the events. Of these, only three were tasked by the FBI to report on specific domestic terrorism subjects. Four informants (across the group) entered the Capitol, and others entered restricted areas, but none were authorized by the FBI to do so, break the law, or encourage violence. Most of the 26 attended on their own initiative.

congress.gov

Claims of "274 plainclothes FBI agents" in the crowd stem from later clarifications (e.g., by then-FBI Director Kash Patel in 2025), but these refer to agents responding after the riot was declared—primarily for crowd control, pipe bomb investigations, or post-breach support—not pre-placed infiltrators inciting the crowd.

foxnews.com

Broader "federal agents" claims (including from other agencies) lack substantiation for the "200-plus" figure in the sense of orchestrated presence. Official investigations, including the DOJ OIG review, have repeatedly debunked theories of FBI or other federal orchestration of the riot.

Capitol Police "Standing Down"

Capitol Police did not "mysteriously stand down" in an orchestrated or suspicious manner to deliberately allow entry. The response involved documented security failures, poor planning, intelligence shortcomings, and being overwhelmed by the crowd size and violence—not a deliberate stand-down order.

Officers faced a large, surging crowd that breached outer perimeters around 1:00–2:00 p.m. Some videos show officers appearing to step aside, open barriers, or not aggressively resist at certain points (e.g., at specific doors or after initial breaches). In context, this often occurred because officers were outnumbered, exhausted, injured, or following de-escalation amid chaos; some rioters later claimed they believed they had implicit permission.

politifact.com

Internal reviews and Senate reports highlighted leadership failures: inadequate preparation despite warnings, restrictions on less-lethal weapons for some units, delayed requests for National Guard support, and command issues. For example, Capitol Police leadership ordered lockdowns and evacuations as breaches occurred, but resources were stretched thin (including due to pipe bomb distractions).

en.wikipedia.org

A Capitol Police internal watchdog report noted orders limiting aggressive crowd-control tools in some cases, and officers were suspended or investigated afterward. However, this reflects operational breakdowns and hesitation under pressure, not a mysterious conspiracy to invite entry. Multiple investigations (Senate, House, DOJ) described it as a "monumental security failure" due to intelligence lapses and poor coordination, not intentional facilitation.

washingtonpost.com

Videos of officers interacting with the crowd (e.g., waving people in or forming lines that later retreated) have been widely circulated and interpreted in partisan ways, but fact-checks and timelines show no evidence of a pre-planned "stand-down" to enable the breach. The initial breaches involved forced entry, broken windows, assaults on officers, and bear spray/pepper spray use against police.

Overall Context

January 6 involved real security and intelligence failures across agencies (FBI, Capitol Police, Pentagon/D.C. National Guard response delays). Thousands entered the Capitol unlawfully, leading to violence, deaths (including a rioter shot by police and officers who died later), and over 1,000+ prosecutions. Investigations found no evidence of a "fed-surrection" or federal agents orchestrating the event.

The statement overstates unproven elements ("200-plus federal agents" in the crowd as infiltrators) while framing routine chaos and documented lapses as "mysterious" stand-downs. Partial truths about informants present and police inconsistencies exist, but the claim as a whole does not hold up under scrutiny from official reports.