Podcast On Tippit

[Martin Weidmann]

By assumptions, you mean assumptions that the evidence is genuine?

I guess it is more fun to dream up excuses to disregard the evidence and imagine scenarios unburdened by what has been.

By assumptions, you mean assumptions that the evidence is genuine?

Wow, did you figure that out by yourself?

I guess it is more fun to dream up excuses to disregard the evidence

Is it? What excuses have I made to disregard the evidence?

and imagine scenarios unburdened by what has been.

Pray tell, what exactly has been and how do you know? Let me guess, by blindly and with no questions asked accepting "the evidence"..... Right?

[Martin Weidmann]

Why do posts duplicate as a quote?

This is the second text that I had to delete.

[John Corbett]

It's a simple proposition. Either you accept the evidence as genuine, you have reasons/excuses for not accepting it as genuine, or you are arbitrarily dismissing evidence you don't want to accept as genuine.

Which of the above applies to you.

[Martin Weidmann]

It's a simple proposition. Either you accept the evidence as genuine, you have reasons/excuses for not accepting it as genuine, or you are arbitrarily dismissing evidence you don't want to accept as genuine.

Which of the above applies to you.

Either you accept the evidence as genuine,

Like you do, you mean?

you have reasons/excuses for not accepting it as genuine,

I don't need reasons or excuses. Evidence needs to be authenticated, conclusive and persuasive. Either it is or it isn't!

or you are arbitrarily dismissing evidence you don't want to accept as genuine.

Again, I haven't dismissed anything as not genuine. There wouldn't be any point.

Which of the above applies to you.

None. All you are showing, by asking this question, is your own "black or white", "right or wrong", "with us or against us" approach to this case.

Outright acceptance of evidence being genuine or dismissal of the same evidence is a pointless proposition which only demonstrates a predisposed bias.

You do understand that "genuine" evidence (whatever that means) still may not support an assumption or assertion that's made based on that evidence, don't you?

[Gerry Down]

Explain how Oswald could be innocent when about a dozen witnesses either saw him shoot Tippit or saw him leaving the scene with a gun in his hand and he was arrested a short time later with the Tippit murder weapon in his possession. In what Bizarro universe is such a thing even possible.

Michael Brownlow was the leading expert on the Tippit case. He solved these issues decades ago and has documented his research on many videos online confirming Oswald's guilt at 10th and Patton.

[Tom Graves]

Michael Brownlow was the leading expert on the Tippit case. He solved these issues decades ago and has documented his research on many videos online confirming Oswald's guilt at 10th and Patton.

You and Brownlow are full of beans and KGB disinformation whether you realize it or not.

[Zeon Mason]

There might have been some double timing by Oswald at intervals, so it’s not that difficult to get him to McWaters bus  in 4 minutes boarding the bus at 12:37 if Oswald was able to leave TSBD by 12:33.

3 minutes later at 12:40 , Oswald exited the bus. He then double timed the 4 blocks in 2 minutes and entered Whaleys taxi at 12:42

6 minutes later, Oswald exited the taxi at 12:48
He then double timed 5 blocks in 3 minutes, entering the boarding house at 12:51

4 minutes to change shirt and jacket , get the revolver and exit house and stand outside for 1 minute before leaving at 12:56.

11 minute walk to 10th and Patton = Oswald seen by Markam at 1:06-1:07.

It works with Bowleys 1:10 watch time.

Tippit is shot by Oswald by 1:08 and flees the scene by 1:09.

Benavides waited only about 1 minute so he was at the Tippit car by 1:10 when Bowley showed up.

The call by Bowley at 1:10 works with the 1:15 DOA document time per the emergency doctor.

1:10:30 sec , ambulance dispatched

Time for ambulance is 2 minutes each way plus 30 sec to unload and unload body and into the emergency room by 1:15pm.

The hardcore LN will argue that Markam and Bowley times and the emergency room clocks were all 5-8 minutes slow and therefore the above scenario is invalid because of DPD clock time.

The hardcore CT will argue that Oswald would not have double timed any of the distances because ( fill in any  answer here) therefore it’s impossible Oswald arrived at 10th and Patton by 1:07pm.