Podcast On Tippit

[Martin Weidmann]

Explain how Oswald could be innocent when about a dozen witnesses either saw him shoot Tippit or saw him leaving the scene with a gun in his hand and he was arrested a short time later with the Tippit murder weapon in his possession. In what Bizarro universe is such a thing even possible.

In what Bizarro universe is such a thing even possible.
 
Perhaps you should check out the case of Rubin "Hurricane" Carter and the activities of the Innocence Project https://innocenceproject.org/. You might learn something.

[Tommy Shanks]

Perhaps you should check out the case of Rubin "Hurricane" Carter and the activities of the Innocence Project https://innocenceproject.org/. You might learn something.

This has nothing whatsoever to do with Oswald's murder of Tippit, the evidence for which is beyond overwhelming.

[John Corbett]

In what Bizarro universe is such a thing even possible.
 
Perhaps you should check out the case of Rubin "Hurricane" Carter and the activities of the Innocence Project https://innocenceproject.org/. You might learn something.

So you really don't have an explanation. Don't feel bad. Nobody else does either.

[Martin Weidmann]

So you really don't have an explanation. Don't feel bad. Nobody else does either.

Don't have to have one. It's a silly question that contains assumptions about the evidence.

Only a superficial look at the "evidence" would cause such a question being asked.

[Martin Weidmann]

This has nothing whatsoever to do with Oswald's murder of Tippit, the evidence for which is beyond overwhelming.

Nobody said it had anything to do with Oswald or Tippit. But it does show just how unreliable witness identification and testimony is.

You didn't understand that?

Didn't you just say something about 'critical thinking'? Are you sure you should be using such words?

[Martin Weidmann]

Text deleted

[John Corbett]

Don't have to have one. It's a silly question that contains assumptions about the evidence.

Only a superficial look at the "evidence" would cause such a question being asked.

By assumptions, you mean assumptions that the evidence is genuine?

I guess it is more fun to dream up excuses to disregard the evidence and imagine scenarios unburdened by what has been.