Tippit Myth

[Tom Graves]

What "evil Deep State bad guys" are you talking about, precisely?

the planting of evidence

Are you claiming evidence was planted?

the altering of all of the photos, films, and X-rays, and the all-important (and evidently ongoing!) cover up?

Are you claiming there was evidence alteration and a cover up?

Btw, can you name me one truly independent investigation which looked beyond the evidence of the prosecution and looked for evidence that should have been there but wasn't?

Or are you just still trolling?

Dear Marty,

The vast majority of KGB-influenced tinfoil-hat JFKA conspiracy theorists are adamant that Oswald was "patsied," that there was more than one shooter, that evidence was planted, that photos, films and X-rays were altered, and that the "coverup" is continuing!

Aren't you?

-- Tom

[Martin Weidmann]

Dear Marty,

The vast majority of KGB-influenced tinfoil-hat JFKA conspiracy theorists are adamant that Oswald was "patsied," that there was more than one shooter, that evidence was planted, that photos, films and X-rays were altered, and that the "coverup" is continuing!

Aren't you?

-- Tom

The vast majority of KGB-influenced tinfoil-hat JFKA conspiracy theorists are adamant that Oswald was "patsied,"

Are they?

So, you just figured you could generalize it?

Are you one of those silly people who actually believes that if somebody doesn't instantly and superficially accepts the BS you believe in, must be a "conspiracy theorist" (whatever that means)?

If you want to have a conversation with me, why don't you simply answer my questions and we'll take it from there.

[Tom Graves]

The vast majority of KGB-influenced tinfoil-hat JFKA conspiracy theorists are adamant that Oswald was "patsied."

Are they? So, you just figured you could generalize it?

So, are you denying that the vast majority of JFK-influenced tinfoil-hat JFKA conspiracy theorists believe Oswald was "patsied" Mr. Rhetorical?

[Louis Earl]

So . . . we have to disregard all testimony and witnesses whose evidence conflicts with the WC and accept all the testimony from other wideness who were also looking at "spring loaded clocks"? 

Well!  That was easy! 

Next!

[Tom Graves]

So . . . we have to disregard all testimony and witnesses whose evidence conflicts with the WC and accept all the testimony from other wideness who were also looking at "spring loaded clocks"? 

Well!  That was easy! 

Next!

No, not at all!

You can incorporate all of the fringe anti-WC stuff you want, but, unfortunately, you'll end up with a tinfoil-hat CT that requires hundreds, if not thousands, of evil, evil "bad guys."