Gunman in the pergola window...

[Tom Graves]

Thanks Tom!
Thanks for taking the time to read my post!
I used to think you were a bit of a Dick, but you're turning out to be a real swell guy!

JohnM

Absolutely!

The funny thing is, I still think of you as "Meathead Mytton"!

LOL!

[Jake Maxwell]

   There are also windows on the BACK of this same Pergola Shelter. Is it possible that you are actually seeing something through a back window of this Pergola Shelter? Something outside of the shelter, close to, or inside the railroad yard?

I suppose that is a possibility.
However, I do think there are enough visual cues to make the image resolvable as a gunman.
The exact placement could be debated. Closer scrutiny from expert photo analysts might help with this.

[Paul J Cummings]

How many gunman have you located thus far?

[Tommy Shanks]

  Come on now John. You well know what the JFK Assassination Images show with respect to Umbrella Man and the JFK Limo. Stop lowering yourself to the level of Groden. Fold up the card table and stop with the "Three-Card Monty" routine. You're far better than this. I've seen it.

Actually, you're the one who should "fold up," as once again John has shown you don't have a blessed clue what you're talking about as it pertains to the actions of Dealey Plaza witnesses.

[Royell Storing]

Well actually, Umbrella Man has never been a high priority to me because having a guy with an Umbrella making an obvious political statement makes far more sense than using the umbrella as a signal or heaven help us a concealed blow dart, but whatever.
Anyway, Witt's facial structure and body type 15 years later is still an extremely close match for Umbrella Man and the fact that he remembers most of what happened without a pedantic level of detail, in my opinion paints a picture of a normal bloke trying his best to remember a tiny slice of time from a decade and a half ago. Consider if Witt was some JFK fanatic who knew every detail with pinpoint accuracy then that all by itself would be powerful evidence of an impostor.
It reminds me of the eyewitnesses at the assassination, they all viewed an unexpected event once whereas the modern researcher has a ton of points of view from films and photos which they have studied over and over with microscopic detail but when some eyewitness makes some sort of a relatively insignificant error they are dragged over the coals for it? Go figure?

Getting back to the point of this post, when I grabbed the cropped image, I quickly checked the Bronson 8mm film and forgot that Bronson was also taking photographs and snapped the following photo a half second before the Limo reached Witt(my bad), before Bronson a literal second later swapped back to his movie camera.



JohnM

               John - Thanks for going the extra mile with your Bronson JFK Assassination research work. I knew you would. It's a hallmark to be proud of.
   With respect to the Witt HSCA Testimony, the part of his testimony that always jumps out at me is where he describes, "Screeching tires" and "Jamming Brakes". I have Never read or heard a single JFK Assassination eyewitness describe these tire/brake sounds during/after shots being fired. Though Witt's description does match the ASAIC Kellerman's WC testimony of the JFK Limo suddenly accelerating to the point of, "jumping out of the god damn street". We do not see any automobile activity that would produce "Screeching tires", or "Jamming brakes" on any of the JFK Assassination Films. This includes the Current Zapruder Film and the Nix Film (copy).

[Tommy Shanks]

We do not see any automobile activity that would produce "Screeching tires", or "Jamming brakes" on any of the JFK Assassination Films. This includes the Current Zapruder Film and the Nix Film (copy).

So what that we don't "see" these things? Are you incapable of considering the possibility that Witt was embellishing? Or that he simply misremembered? My guess is that you are incapable of considering that, since instead you leap to every ridiculous conspiratorial "explanation."

[Royell Storing]

So what that we don't "see" these things? Are you incapable of considering the possibility that Witt was embellishing? Or that he simply misremembered? My guess is that you are incapable of considering that, since instead you leap to every ridiculous conspiratorial "explanation."

    So you believe Witt, but you don't believe Witt? And then you excuse Witt by claiming he was, "embellishing". Yet, Witt's HSCA "screeching tires" testimony does corroborate ASAIC Kellerman's WC testimony of the JFK Limo, "...leaping out of the G.D street". Knowing and Linking sworn testimony is important. Obviously, you are currently incapable of doing this. You need to buckle down, do the research, and familiarize yourself with the sworn testimony of JFK Assassination key players. This will help you avoid embarrassing yourself.   

[Tommy Shanks]

    So you believe Witt, but you don't believe Witt? And then you excuse Witt by claiming he was, "embellishing". Yet, Witt's HSCA "screeching tires" testimony does corroborate ASAIC Kellerman's WC testimony of the JFK Limo, "...leaping out of the G.D street". Knowing and Linking sworn testimony is important. Obviously, you are currently incapable of doing this. You need to buckle down, do the research, and familiarize yourself with the sworn testimony of JFK Assassination key players. This will help you avoid embarrassing yourself.

Your words, not mine. Yep, I believe that Witt was the Umbrella Man. I don't care if he embellished tires screeching, and nobody else but you does either. The sum and substance of his story matches the actions of the individual in Dealey Plaza perfectly.