Education Forum (No Longer) Moderated by Anti-Semitic Crackpot

[Fred Litwin]

Dr. Niederhut:  Why did you delete the string on the education forum with Mr. Wilkinson?  You can have put it elsewhere, but you deleted it.  Why?

[Tom Graves]

Dr. Niederhut:  Why did you delete the string on the education forum with Mr. Wilkinson?  You can have put it elsewhere, but you deleted it.  Why?

Dear Fred,

Who, pray tell, is "Mr. Wilkinson"?

-- Tom

[Jarrett Smith]

Let me know when you geniuses figure out what liquefied the steel and rapidly demolished 100+ floors of steel girders in the Twin Towers on 9/11.

Jet fuel cannot liquefy steel.  That's Chemistry 101 stuff that Michael Griffith never studied during his "education" as a military propagandist.

Nor does jet fuel explosively pulverize tons of concrete, furniture, and human bodies into pyroclastic ash flumes.

The steel did not liquefy the heat weakened it causing the very cheaply built and very unsafe towers to fall. Take a look at the photo below of one tower illuminated by the sunshine through it. The towers were basically hollow except for the core, and that was turned into a massive furnace flue.



Compare to the new One World Trade Tower

[Dr. William Niederhut]

I already answered this question TWICE above.

Please read my answer.

As for the nonsense claiming that Twin Tower steel girders were not liquefied, please refrain from repeating the disinformation.

There is clear documentation of the liquified steel on film.

Study my reference (above) on 9/11 Science 101.

[Tommy Shanks]

I already answered this question TWICE above.

please refrain from repeating the disinformation.

You're apparently the disinfo specialist, doc. I'll stick with the clear consensus of the scientific community that the towers collapsed because the damage from the plane impacts. No ridiculous controlled demolitions or remote controlled planes or whatever other gibberish you're peddlin.

[Dr. William Niederhut]

You're apparently the disinfo specialist, doc. I'll stick with the clear consensus of the scientific community that the towers collapsed because the damage from the plane impacts. No ridiculous controlled demolitions or remote controlled planes or whatever other gibberish you're peddlin.

Consensus?

The shills pushing the false Bush/Cheney/Zelikow narrative about 9/11 are, essentially, telling the sheeple to ignore the evidence of their eyes and ears.

Ignore the visible and audible explosions that pulverized the Twin Towers, and ignore the cascades of molten steel that were "flowing like a foundry" at Ground Zero, in the recorded testimony of NYFD firemen.

Ignorance is bliss, eh, fellas?

[Tom Graves]

You're apparently the disinfo specialist, doc. I'll stick with the clear consensus of the scientific community that the towers collapsed because the damage from the plane impacts. No ridiculous controlled demolitions or remote-controlled planes or whatever other gibberish you're peddlin.

Tommy,

You don't seem to realize that oodles and gobs of "Deep State" bad guys planted oodles and gobs of charges and faked the footage of the Saudi dudes' boarding the planes and the recorded flight paths, etc., etc., etc.

Heck -- almost as many "Deep State" bad guys as those who carried out (and continue to cover up!) the JFK assassination!!!

What's wrong with you, Tommy?

You sound like a CIA disinfo agent to me!!!

-- Tom