Education Forum Moderated by Anti-Semitic Crackpot---John Simkin is Aware

[Tommy Shanks]

Mark,
 
     This is, precisely, why I have tried to focus on science in discussions of controversial topics like the JFKA and 9/11.
     
     I trust the scientific method as epistemology. 

     And, in my experience, the people who think the 9/11 science researchers are "Anti-Semitic crackpots" are not knowledgeable about science.

     They think that the 100+ floor steel girders in the Twin Towers were abruptly liquefied by Magic Jet Fuel and burning office furniture.

     It's scientifically absurd.

I know I shouldn't be feeding the troll here, but how do you account for fact that the overwhelming majority of scientists who have studied 9/11 reject your baloney about controlled demolition? They're all wrong? They all believe in "scientifically absurd" conclusions? BTW, people said you were an "Anti-Semitic crackpot" because you promote the work of a known anti-Semite who doesn't believe six million Jews died in the Holocaust. It has nothing to do with "9/11 science."

[Dr. William Niederhut]

I know I shouldn't be feeding the troll here, but how do you account for fact that the overwhelming majority of scientists who have studied 9/11 reject your baloney about controlled demolition? They're all wrong? They all believe in "scientifically absurd" conclusions? BTW, people said you were an "Anti-Semitic crackpot" because you promote the work of a known anti-Semite who doesn't believe six million Jews died in the Holocaust. It has nothing to do with "9/11 science."

Newsflash, fella.  You ARE the troll here.

You, obviously, don't understand the 9/11 science data.

Study my tutorial at the Education Forum link I posted (above) yesterday.

[Tommy Shanks]

Newsflash, fella.  You ARE the troll here.

You, obviously, don't understand the 9/11 science data.

Study my tutorial at the Education Forum link I posted (above) yesterday.

Not going to spend one second "studying" any of your work. I'd just like to know how you can explain the fact that the vast and overwhelming majority of scientific experts reject your controlled demolition stuff. So please enlighten us.. is every single one of them wrong, and you are correct?