Education Forum (No Longer) Moderated by Anti-Semitic Crackpot

[Tommy Shanks]

Same old bogus Michael Griffith propaganda tropes about Prouty.  These have been debunked in detail by Prouty archivist Len Osanic, and Prouty historian Jeff Carter.  As for Griffith's official status as a WCR critic, is it a limited hangout?

Are you accusing Michael Griffith of being paid to post on this board? Can't you just go back to your own forum and leave everybody here alone?

[Dr. William Niederhut]

Well, so much for Grok's "intelligence."

The fraudulent NIST report never explained the abrupt free fall demolition of WTC7.

Nor did they explain the visible explosive pulverization of the Twin Towers and liquefied steel.

Grok gets an "F" in 9/11 Science 101.

As for Michael Griffith, where does he work?

[Fred Litwin]

why was Wilkinson's string deleted at the education forum?

[Tom Graves]

Where does Michael Griffith work?

Dear Bill,

It's amazing just how devious those sons of guns at the KGB I mean the CIA are!

-- Tom

PS My bad. As I'm sure you would agree, the KGB* is a world-class humanitarian organization compared to the evil, evil CIA!

*Today's SVR and FSB

[Dr. William Niederhut]

Hi, Fred.

John Simkin has asked us to not discuss 9/11 on the JFKA board.

Wilkinson raised the subject in the context of the false accusations that I am an Anti-Semite.

I did go to the trouble today of starting a new thread on our 9/11 board for people-- including Wilkinson, Ben Cole, and Michael Griffith-- who still don't understand the 9/11 science data.

https://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/32001-911-science-101-for-beginners/

I should point out that these Anti-Truthers (above) have not studied physics or chemistry at a collegiate or post-graduate level. 

In Griffith's case, disinformation is a job.

As for Grok-- it's merely regurgitating the ubiquitous government disinformation on the internet.

It's a GIGO model.  Garbage-In-Garbage-Out.

Cheers.

[Tom Graves]

Hi, Fred.

John Simkin has asked us to not discuss 9/11 on the JFKA board.

Wilkinson raised the subject in the context of the false accusations that I am an Anti-Semite.

I did go to the trouble today of starting a new thread on our 9/11 board for people-- including Wilkinson, Ben Cole, and Michael Griffith-- who still don't understand the 9/11 science data.

https://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/32001-911-science-101-for-beginners/

I should point out that these Anti-Truthers (above) have not studied physics or chemistry at a collegiate or post-graduate level. 

In Griffith's case, disinformation is a job.

As for Grok-- it's merely regurgitating the ubiquitous government disinformation on the internet.

It's a GIGO model.  Garbage-In-Garbage-Out.

Cheers.

Dear Dr. William Niederhut,

You're full of high-fructose beans.

-- Tom

[Tommy Shanks]

Hi, Fred.

John Simkin has asked us to not discuss 9/11 on the JFKA board.

Wilkinson raised the subject in the context of the false accusations that I am an Anti-Semite.

I did go to the trouble today of starting a new thread on our 9/11 board for people-- including Wilkinson, Ben Cole, and Michael Griffith-- who still don't understand the 9/11 science data.

https://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/32001-911-science-101-for-beginners/

I should point out that these Anti-Truthers (above) have not studied physics or chemistry at a collegiate or post-graduate level. 

In Griffith's case, disinformation is a job.

As for Grok-- it's merely regurgitating the ubiquitous government disinformation on the internet.

It's a GIGO model.  Garbage-In-Garbage-Out.

Cheers.

Oh I get it.. everybody is wrong besides you, the master intellectual Dr. Niederhut.. yet you come over here and imply that people on another forum post "disinformation" as part of a "job." Nobody believes your 9/11 controlled demolition spiel anyway. Buzz off.