Education Forum Moderated by Anti-Semitic Crackpot---John Simkin is Aware

[Mitch Todd]

W. Niederhut should just be pre-emptively banned from posting here, especially if the sole purpose is to chase down members of an entirely different forum. Buzz off, man!

Niederhut should be allowed to post here, if for no other reason than he should have every right to respond to something posted about him on this forum.  So far, It doesn't look like he's broken any rules here.

[Tom Graves]

Niederhut should be allowed to post here, if for no other reason than he should have every right to respond to something posted about him on this forum.  So far, It doesn't look like he's broken any rules here.

I agree.

[Dr. William Niederhut]

 :'(We have discussed John McAdam's defamation of Fletcher Prouty as an "Anti-Semitic crackpot" in fairly exhaustive detail on the Education Forum.

Most of those discussions have occurred in response to Michael Griffith's repetitive propaganda posts attacking Prouty.

My opinion is that it is government-funded character assassination of the former Joint Chiefs Liaison to the CIA in 1963.

The defamation of Prouty began in earnest after Oliver Stone's movie JFK came out in 1992.

Donald Sutherland played "Mr. X" in the film-- a JFKA whistleblower based mainly on Fletcher Prouty.

[Mitch Todd]

We have discussed John McAdam's defamation of

He defamed         I'm trying to remember that but keep drawing a blank.

[Tommy Shanks]

This Niederhut guy is something else, eh? Apparently believes all the World Trade Center buildings were leveled by "controlled demolition" ? He should hash out his issues with members of his own forum over there, not here.

[Michael T. Griffith]

For any newcomers or for those who don't know much about L. Fletcher Prouty (whom Niederhut ardently defends), here is a short list of some of the nutty claims and statements Prouty made:

-- He would not be surprised to learn that Princess Diana was murdered by the "Secret Team."
-- Stalin's theory that FDR was poisoned by agents sent by Winston Churchill deserved serious consideration.
-- The goals of the Holocaust-denying IHR were "important" (the full quote: "I never knew a time when its primary goals were more important than right now.")
-- Holocaust denier and Liberty Lobby founder Willis Carto was a man of "vision" and "courage," and Prouty even testified as a character witness for him at the Liberty Lobby libel trial.
-- Prouty appeared 10 times in four years on Liberty Lobby's nutcase radio program, which routinely peddled white supremacy, Holocaust denial, and anti-Semitism.
-- Prouty recommended Liberty Lobby's anti-Semitic rag The Spotlight.
-- Prouty actually spoke at a Liberty Lobby convention and at an IHR conference. At the Liberty Lobby convention, he blamed Israel for high gas prices. As usual, the IHR conference included speakers who denied the Holocaust.
-- When asked if the Holocaust happened, Prouty replied, "I'm no authority in that area."
-- We should be concerned about Jewish sergeants manning our weapons systems.
-- The Joint Chiefs of Staff were involved in the Jonestown Massacre.
-- Chiang Kai-shek attended the Tehran Conference, and Prouty himself flew Chiang's delegation to Tehran for the conference.
-- L. Ron Hubbard, the fraud who founded the scam known as the Church of Scientology, worked in U.S. Navy intelligence and was an upright, reliable person. Prouty testified in Hubbard's defense in Hubbard's fraud trial.

I document all these and other claims/statements in my article

Exposing the Bogus, Nutty Claims of L. Fletcher Prouty on the JFK Assassination, the Vietnam War, and Other Historical Issues
https://drive.google.com/file/d/18I0XTK6tsfrHAtFnNxNzAEBgD1Uz_dlv/view

Niederhut should be allowed to post here, if for no other reason than he should have every right to respond to something posted about him on this forum.  So far, It doesn't look like he's broken any rules here.

Gee, why am I not surprised that you would spring to the defense of Niederhut's "right" to post here so he can defend himself, never mind that he won't afford that same right to people whom he attacks or disagrees with on the Education Forum. Do you believe 9/11 was an inside job carried out by U.S. intelligence agents, that the Twin Towers were brought down by controlled demolitions planted by U.S. intel operatives, that Israel purposely attacked the USS Liberty in 1967 and that powerful Zionists helped cover it up, that Hamas is the victim and Israel the aggressor, that the Israeli government played a role in JFK's death, and that Fletcher Prouty was a credible source? Niederhut believes all of these things.

[Mitch Todd]

Gee, why am I not surprised that you would spring to the defense of Niederhut's "right" to post here so he can defend himself, never mind that he won't afford that same right to people whom he attacks or disagrees with on the Education Forum.

My position is neither an endorsement nor condemnation Niederhut's behavior at the EF. Nor is it an endorsement or condemnation of anything Ben C has said at the EF or here. I simply noted that Niederhut should be allowed to respond here to something that Ben has posted here about him. It is a position born of simple human decency. Nor has WN violated any of the rules here. Why then should he be banned for posting here?

Do you believe 9/11 was an inside job carried out by U.S. intelligence agents, that the Twin Towers were brought down by controlled demolitions planted by U.S. intel operatives, that Israel purposely attacked the USS Liberty in 1967 and that powerful Zionists helped cover it up, that Hamas is the victim and Israel the aggressor, that the Israeli government played a role in JFK's death, and that Fletcher Prouty was a credible source? Niederhut believes all of these things.

Why would you think that I believed in any of these ideas?

[Tom Graves]

My position is neither an endorsement nor condemnation of Niederhut's behavior at the EF. Nor is it an endorsement or condemnation of anything Ben C has said at the EF or here. I simply noted that Niederhut should be allowed to respond here to something that Ben has posted here about him. It is a position born of simple human decency. Nor has WN violated any of the rules here. Why then should he be banned for posting here? Why would you [Griffith] think that I believed in any of these ideas [i.e., that "9/11 was an inside job carried out by U.S. intelligence agents, that the Twin Towers were brought down by controlled demolitions planted by U.S. intel operatives, that Israel purposely attacked the USS Liberty in 1967 and that powerful Zionists helped cover it up, that Hamas is the victim and Israel the aggressor, that the Israeli government played a role in JFK's death, and that Fletcher Prouty was a credible source"]?

Those things are just as loony as Griffith's KGB-encouraged belief that the evil, evil Deep State killed JFK.