AI, CIA and "Contract Source"

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
Fred Litwin, Russell Copeland, Benjamin Cole

Author Topic: AI, CIA and "Contract Source"  (Read 194 times)

Online Fred Litwin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 552
Re: AI, CIA and "Contract Source"
« Reply #8 on: Today at 02:29:06 AM »
Benjamin: I guess the CIA has better things to do.

Yes, the segregated collection is online and you can search for yourself.

No one has ever found substantiation in any underlying document. And no one has come up with a CIA document that uses the term "contract source."

As I  said in my blog post, Paul Hoch found another error in that document, and the CIA has not commented on that either.

fred

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: AI, CIA and "Contract Source"
« Reply #8 on: Today at 02:29:06 AM »


Offline Michael Capasse

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 687
Re: AI, CIA and "Contract Source"
« Reply #9 on: Today at 02:42:14 AM »
WC Executive Session | Jan. 27, 1964

Rep. Boggs. So I will ask you. Did you have agents about whom you had no record whatsoever?

Mr. Dulles. The record might not be on paper. But on paper would have hieroglyphics that only two
people knew what they meant, and nobody outside the agency else could say it meant another agent.

Rep. Boggs. Let's take a specific case, that fellow Powers was one of your men.
Mr. Dulles. Oh, yes, he was not an agent. He was an employee.

Rep. Boggs. There was no problem in proving he was employed by the CIA.
Mr. Dulles. No. We had a signed contract.

Rep. Boggs. Let's say Powers did not have a signed contract but he was recruited by someone in CIA.
The man who recruited him would know, wouldn't he?

Mr. Dulles. Yes, but he wouldn't tell.

The Chairman. Wouldn't tell it under oath?
Mr. Dulles. I wouldn't think he would tell it under oath, no.

The Chairman. Why?
Mr. Dulles. He ought not tell it under oath. Maybe not tell it to his own government but he wouldn't tell it any other way.

Mr. McCloy. Wouldn't tell it to his own chief?
Mr. Dulles. He might or might not. If he was a bad one then he wouldn't.
« Last Edit: Today at 02:44:09 AM by Michael Capasse »

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3110
Re: AI, CIA and "Contract Source"
« Reply #10 on: Today at 02:53:23 AM »
WC Executive Session | Jan. 27, 1964

Rep. Boggs. So I will ask you. Did you have agents about whom you had no record whatsoever?

Mr. Dulles. The record might not be on paper. But on paper would have hieroglyphics that only two
people knew what they meant, and nobody outside the agency else could say it meant another agent.

Rep. Boggs. Let's take a specific case, that fellow Powers was one of your men.
Mr. Dulles. Oh, yes, he was not an agent. He was an employee.

Rep. Boggs. There was no problem in proving he was employed by the CIA.
Mr. Dulles. No. We had a signed contract.

Rep. Boggs. Let's say Powers did not have a signed contract but he was recruited by someone in CIA.
The man who recruited him would know, wouldn't he?

Mr. Dulles. Yes, but he wouldn't tell.

The Chairman. Wouldn't tell it under oath?
Mr. Dulles. I wouldn't think he would tell it under oath, no.

The Chairman. Why?
Mr. Dulles. He ought not tell it under oath. Maybe not tell it to his own government but he wouldn't tell it any other way.

Mr. McCloy. Wouldn't tell it to his own chief?
Mr. Dulles. He might or might not. If he was a bad one then he wouldn't.

Wowie zowie!

That proves it!

Clay Shaw was a "highly paid" CIA "contract source"!


Whatever that is.

Online Benjamin Cole

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 436
Re: AI, CIA and "Contract Source"
« Reply #11 on: Today at 03:08:55 AM »
FL--

You seem to be a leading proponent of the theory that the CIA historian inaccurately defined Clay Shaw's role with the CIA in 1992, and then never issued a clarification or retraction of an obvious error. 

https://www.cia.gov/contact-cia/

The above is a connecting link to the CIA Public Affairs/Media Relation guys.

Go ahead and ask them if the CIA historian made a basic blunder.

If they say so, I will buy it.

You have done a word search on some online documents. That is not the same as reviewing the actual physical papers and items the CIA historian's well-staffed office did, including microfilmed documents, and other ephemera.

Good luck with the CIA public affairs staff.

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3110
Re: AI, CIA and "Contract Source"
« Reply #12 on: Today at 03:28:23 AM »
FL--

You seem to be a leading proponent of the theory that the CIA historian inaccurately defined Clay Shaw's role with the CIA in 1992, and then never issued a clarification or retraction of an obvious error. 

https://www.cia.gov/contact-cia/

The above is a connecting link to the CIA Public Affairs/Media Relation guys.

Go ahead and ask them if the CIA historian made a basic blunder.

If they say so, I will buy it.

You have done a word search on some online documents. That is not the same as reviewing the actual physical papers and items the CIA historian's well-staffed office did, including microfilmed documents, and other ephemera.

Good luck with the CIA public affairs staff.

Dear "BC,"

Maybe he was too embarrassed to admit it.

Or maybe Bruce Solie got to him.

Did he ever apologize for the huge mistake he or one of his assistants made in the same 1992 report regarding Gilberto Alvarado, Elena Garro de Paz and Lee Harvey Oswald?

No?

WHY NOT?


-- "TG"
« Last Edit: Today at 03:30:00 AM by Tom Graves »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: AI, CIA and "Contract Source"
« Reply #12 on: Today at 03:28:23 AM »


Online Benjamin Cole

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 436
Re: AI, CIA and "Contract Source"
« Reply #13 on: Today at 05:57:22 AM »
There is a possibility DeMohrenschildt was an Iron Curtain asset, or double agent.

All the more reason for Solie to have Moore contact DeM. and have him surveil LHO?

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3110
Re: AI, CIA and "Contract Source"
« Reply #14 on: Today at 06:06:13 AM »
There is a possibility DeMohrenschildt was an Iron Curtain asset, or double agent.

All the more reason for Solie to have Moore contact DeM. and have him surveil LHO?

1) Contrary to what Freddy said earlier, Solie and Moore worked in different parts of the CIA.

2) Although we know that Moore approached DeMohrenschildt in 1957 for info on Yugoslavia, he was later warned off him due to GdM's shady connections.

3) We have only probable KGB agent DeMohrenschildt's word that he discussed LHO with Moore.

4) Moore denied it under oath and said the that last time he'd spoken with GdM was in the fall of 1961.

5) How ya like dem apples, "BC"?
« Last Edit: Today at 03:56:52 PM by Tom Graves »

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3110
Re: AI, CIA and "Contract Source"
« Reply #15 on: Today at 04:00:00 PM »

"BC" wrote: There is a possibility DeMohrenschildt was an Iron Curtain asset, or double agent. All the more reason for Solie to have Moore contact DeM. and have him surveil LHO?

My reply:

1) Contrary to what Freddy said earlier, Solie and Moore worked in different parts of the CIA.

2) Although we know that Moore approached DeMohrenschildt in 1957 for info on Yugoslavia, he was later warned off him due to GdM's shady connections.

3) We have only probable KGB agent DeMohrenschildt's word that he discussed LHO with Moore.

4) Moore denied it under oath and said the that last time he'd spoken with GdM was in the fall of 1961.

5) How ya like dem apples, "BC"?

Edited and bumped for "BC"
« Last Edit: Today at 04:01:16 PM by Tom Graves »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: AI, CIA and "Contract Source"
« Reply #15 on: Today at 04:00:00 PM »