The bullet hole in the windshield: Was a second shooter involved in the JFKA?

[Tom Graves]

The bullet hole in the windshield: Was a second shooter involved in the JFKA?

https://www.usglassmag.com/glass-evidence-was-a-second-shooter-involved-in-president-kennedys-assassination/?

[Marjan Rynkiewicz]

No direct shot from Oswald could have made that/there damage to the glass, when the needed angles are inspected.
No ricochet from Oswald could have made that damage, or it could, but would be an impossible ricochet when the needed angles are inspected.
So, the damage to the glass confirms a 2nd shooter.

[Tim Nickerson]

No direct shot from Oswald could have made that/there damage to the glass, when the needed angles are inspected.
No ricochet from Oswald could have made that damage, or it could, but would be an impossible ricochet when the needed angles are inspected.
So, the damage to the glass confirms a 2nd shooter.

The damage to the windshield glass and chrome piece were not caused by ricochets. They were caused by strikes by large bullet fragments that exited Kennedy's head. Those strikes were not impossible. There was no second shooter.

[Marjan Rynkiewicz]

The damage to the windshield glass and chrome piece were not caused by ricochets. They were caused by strikes by large bullet fragments that exited Kennedy's head. Those strikes were not impossible. There was no second shooter.

A headshot by Oswald could not possibly veer enuff tween head & glass to cause that damage to the glass, unless it got some help from a ricochet tween head & glass.
And of course the veer &/or ricochet needed to damage the chrome would need to be even more severe.
But the remnant slug from a headshot from Hickey's AR15 could veer enuff to damage the glass, the needed veer is much less than from Oswald's pozzy, no ricochet needed.
And a shot from Hickey could eezyly hit the chrome directly, no veer or ricochet needed.