Why are so many Trump supporters tinfoil-hat JFKA conspiracy theorists?

[Tom Graves]

Why are so many Trump supporters tinfoil-hat JFKA conspiracy theorists?

[Benjamin Cole]

Have you seen the price of gold leaf and foil?

Of course, they are using tin-foil. (Technically, aluminum foil).

[Tom Graves]

Most Trump supporters are strongly anti-Communist / anti-Socialist.

Do they think JFK was killed by a Communist or Socialist conspiracy?

If it's true, as John M. Newman says, that a Kremlin-loyal mole in the CIA sent Lee Harvey Oswald to Moscow in 1959 to unwittingly protect said mole from being uncovered, the fact that he ended up living half-a-mile from a KGB school in Minsk for two-and-a-half years (and married a former KGB "swallow" whose "uncle" was an MVD colonel) suggests that those Trump supporters might be right, after all.

With one big caveat: Under this scenario, the "conspiracy" didn't involve oodles and gobs of "Deep State" bad guys, just the KGB's encouraging and/or training of former Marine sharpshooter Oswald and he did the rest all by him widdle self-described Marxist self.

Ironically, Trump-supporting tinfoil-hat JFKA conspiracy theorists don't realize that a former KGB counterintelligence officer -- who murdered 307 of his own citizens in 1999 to become president of his country and whom some people say is still a Communist -- put Trump in the White House in 2017 and 2025, and the anti-”Deep State” disinformation that the KGB spread about the anomaly-replete (e.g., flash-bang, dorsal-side-of-wrist, HUGE GATES, "abandoned getaway car") assassination for fifty-plus years helped him do it.

[Michael T. Griffith]

Why are so many Trump supporters tinfoil-hat JFKA conspiracy theorists?

Why do you keep ignoring the fact that 2/3 to 3/4 of the Western world rejects your JFKA lone-gunman theory? Why do you keep ignoring the fact that your lone-gunman theory has approximately the same level of support as some of the 9/11 conspiracy theories? If anyone is wearing "tinfoil hats," it is you guys, not those of us who agree with 2/3 to 3/4 of the Western world.

You reject the conclusions of the last official U.S. Government investigation into the JFK assassination, i.e., the two-year investigation done by House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) from 1977 to 1979. You reject the HSCA's conclusions but accept the Warren Commission's (WC's) conclusions, even though the HSCA did a far more thorough investigation than the WC, and even though we now know that three of the seven WC members did not accept some of the Commission's key claims (whereas only three of the 12 HSCA members dissented from the Select Committee's findings).

Just to refresh your memory: The HSCA concluded that there were two gunmen, that four shots were fired, that one of the shots came from the grassy knoll, that the Odio sisters' account was credible, that Ruby lied about how he entered the police basement to shoot Oswald, that Ruby lied about why he shot Oswald, that someone was moving boxes around in the sixth-floor window shortly after the shooting at a time when Oswald could not have been the one moving the boxes, that Oswald associated with virulent right-wing extremists David Ferrie and Guy Banister, that the first shot was fired at a time when the sixth-floor gunman's view of JFK would have been obstructed by the oak tree on Elm Street, that Howard Brennan's identification of Oswald as the sixth-floor gunman was unreliable (this was a tacit but clear HSCA conclusion), and that two of the shots were fired only 1.66 seconds apart.

Also, we now know that the HSCA staffers who investigated Oswald's activities in Mexico City concluded that someone had impersonated Oswald in Mexico City, and that the Lee Harvey Oswald who called the Soviet Embassy was not the real Oswald.

[Royell Storing]

  The "tell" is Gerry Ford altering the Warren Report written description of the JFK BACK wound. When Ford re-wrote that wound description to read, "base of the neck",  it was obvious they would do whatever was required to support the "lone nut" scenario. Specter's SBT was more of the same. Ford being rewarded with the Presidency, and Specter a US Senate seat. 

[Tom Graves]

The "tell" is Gerry (sic) Ford altering the Warren Report written description of the JFK BACK wound. When Ford re-wrote that wound description to read, "base of the neck",  it was obvious they would do whatever was required to support the "lone nut" scenario. Specter's SBT was more of the same. Ford being rewarded with the Presidency, and Specter a US Senate seat.

Dear Sonderführer Storing,

Did Jerry Ford do something wrong by making the written and/or diagrammed location of the wound in JFK's lower neck / upper back correspond with the measurements taken and written down by Drs. Humes and Boswell during autopsy?

D'oh!

-- Tom

[Royell Storing]

Dear Sonderführer Storing,

Did Jerry Ford do something wrong by making the written and/or diagrammed location of the wound in JFK's lower neck / upper back correspond with the measurements taken and written down by Drs. Humes and Boswell during autopsy?

D'oh!

-- Tom

  The Ford written description was "base of the Neck". They thought they were safe doing this as the Autopsy Photos were supposed to be sealed for 75 yrs or something like that. The autopsy photos did "leak" out. The JFK Autopsy Photo of his back is clear. There's a bullet hole in his Back.

[Tom Graves]

The Ford written description was "base of the Neck". They thought they were safe doing this as the Autopsy Photos were supposed to be sealed for 75 yrs or something like that. The autopsy photos did "leak" out. The JFK Autopsy Photo of his back is clear. There's a bullet hole in his Back.

Dear Sonderführer Storing,

Why are you avoiding my question?

Here it is, again, rephrased for you:

Do you think the measurements that were written down by Humes or Boswell on the same piece of paper that had the diagram of JFK's body should be ignored?

-- Tom