Does Connally's wrist wound disprove the SBT?

[Andrew Mason]

That would put the car about a car length before

If that idea is what happened, then: it takes a little time for a thought to form in the brain. The limo was still moving in the meantime.

Or if she was correct that when the first shot sounded, JFK was passing the sightline between her and the Stemmons sign then it could be that the shot was a bit earlier than z195-z203.

So that white area in her “arm” just happens to match the white area behind her “arm?

It is called overexposure. Here’s a photo that shows the concept. It’s the full moon rising as photographed through the branches of a dogwood tree. The moon appears to be part of the limb. When actuality the moon is about 240,000 miles behind the limb.




If you watch the moving image (as the movie film is designed to be displayed) you might be able to see that the white area appears to be some white pants moving in the crowd beyond Linda Willis. Typically, the blurry still frames images “magically” become a much clearer moving image when displayed as a movie.

Its actually called "diffraction" and it occurs when light passes around a thin edge object.  It takes a bright light so that the interference pattern, which is constructive in the centre (i.e. behind the branch), also looks bright.   Your white pants lady theory does not provide the amount of light needed to create that effect.

I'll give you a B+ for creativity, though.

[Charles Collins]

Or if she was correct that when the first shot sounded, JFK was passing the sightline between her and the Stemmons sign then it could be that the shot was a bit earlier than z195-z203.
Its actually called "diffraction" and it occurs when light passes around a thin edge object.  It takes a bright light so that the interference pattern, which is constructive in the centre (i.e. behind the branch), also looks bright.   Your white pants lady theory does not provide the amount of light needed to create that effect.

I'll give you a B+ for creativity, though.

Your white pants lady theory does not provide the amount of light needed to create that effect.


Andrew, I have to disagree with you. The moon is reflected sunlight. So is the light being reflected off of the white clothing. Here’s another image cropped from a Zapruder frame a few frames after the one with Linda Willis pointing towards the TSBD. As we can see, there is enough bright light being reflected off of the clothing to cause an apparent starburst effect (lens flare or refraction or whatever you want to call it).