Why did Oswald go to the movies?

[Bill Chapman]

Whew.  That reads like "Murder on the Orient Express."  Why would your fantasy conspirators need to arrange a rendezvous with Oswald if they just wanted him to be arrested?  He was going to be arrested sooner or later.  A guy on foot with no money or assistance wasn't going to make it very far that day.  Safer to let it play out on its own.  But instead they arrange this elaborate scenario involving random citizens, Jack Ruby, doubles etc who they somehow coerce to lie on their behalf in the murder of the president?  I like the part about "[d]ark theaters are classic espionage rendezvous."  LOL.   Next time I go to the movies I'll keep a lookout for the KGB and CIA operatives.  I sincerely hope that you don't actually believe any of this but are just conjuring up ad hoc explanations to pass the time.  It's like the rationale used on Ancient Aliens to link historical events to UFOs.  Nonsense.

Next time I go to the movies I'll keep a lookout for the KGB and CIA operatives

Don't forget to look for Iacoletti's "IBM" men
    

[John Iacoletti]

Next time I go to the movies I'll keep a lookout for the KGB and CIA operatives

Don't forget to look for Iacoletti's "IBM" men
 

They're Brewer's IBM men, and they lounge around in (and lock up) shoe stores, not movie theaters.

[Bill Chapman]

I'm sure there were.  But for some reason they weren't automatically considered murder suspects.

Exactly.

To you lot, Oswald is the last person on the planet to suspect

[John Mytton]

They're Brewer's IBM men, and they lounge around in (and lock up) shoe stores, not movie theaters.

And the only way you know about these IBM men is because Brewer told you, wow that's really sinister! Hahaha!

JohnM

[Bill Chapman]

They're Brewer's IBM men, and they lounge around in (and lock up) shoe stores, not movie theaters.

Yeah, they were Brewer's IBM men... as opposed to your "IBM" men


 

[Rob Caprio]

Nah. We enjoy Howard's mocking of you silly buggers

Sounds more like a confession than mocking.

[Rob Caprio]

Your OPs are ridiculously long on purpose in order to prevent sane people from taking the time to read them. You can then convince yourself that nobody can refute you... since no one responds. Even CTers don't respond to your polls in numbers that would show any kind of solidarity FFS

LOL. You sound desperate. The truth is that you CANNOT refute the evidence that shows a conspiracy took place in the twenty-six volumes. And yet, you support the WC's conclusion despite them offering NO supporting evidence.

Why is that?

[Rob Caprio]

Thanks, Bill.

For a moment there I was really worried about losing my membership card.

 

I wouldn't worry about it since you LNers are hard to find since the vast majority of the people in the world know that a conspiracy took place.