Next false assumption.Mrs. POSTAL. No, sir; I told Johnny this, don't tell him, because he is an excitable person, and just have him, you know, go with you and examine the exits and check real good, so, he came back and said he hadn't seen anything although, he had heard a seat pop up like somebody getting out, but there was nobody around that area....Brewer does not report back what Burroughs might have told him. Suspect is currently not to be seen.
Correct, it real simple.You have no clue what Burroughs saw and what conclusions he reached. Neither did Postal since she didn't talk to Burroughs. As per her testimony.Mr. BALL. I was trying to say the third row. How could he get from the balcony down there? Mrs. POSTAL. Oh, that is very easy. You can go up in the balcony and fight straight down, those steps come back down, and that would bring you into it. He wouldn't have to go by Butch at all. The suspect could be anywhere in that theater.As per her testimony.
No, your Von Pein style LN spin doesn't cut it.Totally irrelevant what Burroughs testified since he was not in the loop, Postal cut him out and did not know what he saw or didn't see.The suspect had free rein to move around once past Burroughs.As per Postals testimony.You're bust on this one.
Known bypass is via balcony but not confined to balcony as per testimony.Once past Burroughs suspect can be anywhere in the theater, ticket or no ticket.Burroughs' observations are unknown to Postal and thus irrelevant for her call.
Brewer isn't standing directly in front of the theater so I guess it's accurate that 55 years later a troll could state Brewer didn't see Saint Patsy enter the theater.
It's in her testimony. Clear as day. She thought the man had gone to the balcony because Burroughs did not see him pass through the lobby.
A man is observed by her and Brewer appearing to hide from the police by ducking away from the street whenever a police car goes by.