Why did Oswald go to the movies?

[Tim Nickerson]

Such as?

You haven't answered the question.

[John Iacoletti]

Bill, Tony made the mistake of adopting a pet theory. People should be wary of doing that sort of thing. You'll likely end up defending the undefendable and looking foolish in the process.

You know who looks really foolish?  The people who cling to a dotted line on a photograph where a bag is supposed to be and the hope that everybody who saw the package was mistaken.

[Tim Nickerson]

If you can prove me wrong Tim, that would be marvelous.

Your pet theory is that CE 399 hit JFK at the level of C6 without one shred of evidence it was a through and through wound and CE 399 was involved in hitting anyone.

You think I have issues with my theory? 

Tony, your brain is overheated. It is not now, nor has it ever been, my pet theory that CE 399 hit JFK at the level of C6.

[John Iacoletti]

You haven't answered the question.

You're as bad as Arlen Specter.  "Permit me to supply some additional facts, Dr. Perry, which I shall ask you to assume as being true for purposes of having you express an opinion."

What things did Frazier say later that contradicted his earlier statements?

[Bill Brown]

That's right.  A perfect example of that is Sirhan Sirhan admitted, in a filmed interview, that he shot Bobby Kennedy... even going as far as explaining his motive for doing so.  Yet, some conspiracy nuts, many who are members of this forum, totally ignore that interview.

An admission of guilt does NOT trump the evidence. Nothing does. The evidence does NOT support that Sirhan Sirhan killed RFK, but doesn't rule out that he fired his gun.

Yet, some conspiracy nuts

I rest my case.

[Bill Brown]

Bill, Tony made the mistake of adopting a pet theory. People should be wary of doing that sort of thing. You'll likely end up defending the undefendable and looking foolish in the process.

Indeed.

[John Iacoletti]

So, Lee Oswald just happened to be seen (by both Randle and Frazier) carrying a long bag/sack on the morning of the assassination, a bag totally unrelated to the rifle?

Is there any reason to think that the bag they saw was related to the rifle?