Poll: Is Rosemary Willis looking at the limo in Z-145 or at something else?

[Dan O'meara]

New Poll: In which direction is Rosemary Willis (wearing red dress and white sweatshirt) looking in Z-145?

This is Z-145:





1) Directly at the limousine

2) In the general direction of the limousine

3) Directly at the TSBD

4) In the general direction of the TSBD

5) I, like Benjamin Cole, have no you-know-what clue.

IMO, she's looking directly at Jackie and Jackie is looking directly at her.
Rosemary is running alongside the limo so she can catch Jackie's attention.
She also has to look where she's actually running.
That's why her head alternates between looking forward and looking at Jackie.
Once she can no longer keep up with the limo she stops running.

The idea that she is responding to the sound of a shot has been debunked.
People need to move on.

PS: Interestingly, the idea that the little girl was turning her head in response to the sound of a shot did not originally come from Rosemary. It was invented by a film 'expert' on the HSCA 'investigation'. Rosemary jumped on the bandwagon decades after the event.

[Tom Graves]

Interestingly, the idea that the little girl was turning her head in response to the sound of a shot did not originally come from Rosemary. It was invented by a film 'expert' on the HSCA 'investigation'. Rosemary jumped on the bandwagon decades after the event.

Dear danny BOY o'meara,

It's too bad that you put so much emphasis on what the startled-and-traumatized witlessness said or didn't say after the tragic event.

-- Tom

[Dan O'meara]

Dear danny BOY o'meara,

It's too bad that you put so much emphasis on what the startled-and-traumatized witlessness said or didn't say after the tragic event.

-- Tom

It's too bad you don't care about the evidence.
Don't you have any idea how you come across?
You've carved a very special niche for yourself. You're like a Tinfoil Lone Nutter.
A troll.
Impervious to Reason, Logic or Common Sense.
Do you have any idea how bizarre what you're saying is?
None of the witnesses should be listened to because you say so?
Why do you even bother posting?
Are you lonesome?

[Tom Graves]

It's too bad you don't care about the evidence.

Dear danny BOY o'meara,

That's a suggestion I refuse to accept.

The evidence I care about regarding the actual shooting is the photographic evidence (film, photographs, x-rays), the ballistics evidence, the fingerprint evidence, the medical evidence, and the autopsy report evidence, not the unreliable memories of startled-and-traumatized witnesses that you cherish so rabidly.

-- Tom

[Dan O'meara]

Dear danny BOY o'meara,

That's a suggestion I refuse to accept.

The evidence I care about regarding the actual shooting is the photographic evidence (film, photographs, x-rays), the ballistics evidence, the fingerprint evidence, the medical evidence, and the autopsy report evidence, not the unreliable memories of startled-and-traumatized witnesses that you cherish so rabidly.

-- Tom

That's a suggestion I refuse to accept.

It's not a suggestion.
It's the impartial observation of a fact.
In every interaction I have had with you, you have refused to accept a single scrap of evidence that contradicts your spoon-fed beliefs. Preferring Denial or just making some nonsense up off the top of your head. 
That you think you can just write off all eye-witness testimony shows how deeply delusional you have become regarding this case. There may have been a time when you looked at the evidence with open eyes but that time is long gone.
Debating anything with you is like debating with a parrot that has learned a few key phrases.

This thread is an excellent example of exactly what I'm talking about.
Rosemary Willis responding to a first shot at 'z124' has been debunked in a dozen different ways. It's clear for all to see that you are simply projecting your deluded beliefs onto her completely innocent actions.
And you dare not engage in a genuine debate, as the depth of your delusions will be revealed for everyone to see.
More frighteningly, you might even glimpse those depths for yourself.

[Tom Graves]

[...]

Don't feel sad, widdle danny BOY o'meara.

Vladimir Putin cherishes you and your ilk for what you do!

[Royell Storing]

It's too bad you don't care about the evidence.
Don't you have any idea how you come across?
You've carved a very special niche for yourself. You're like a Tinfoil Lone Nutter.
A troll.
Impervious to Reason, Logic or Common Sense.
Do you have any idea how bizarre what you're saying is?
None of the witnesses should be listened to because you say so?
Why do you even bother posting?
Are you lonesome?

   He totally ignores "evidence". He missed his calling. If he went into broadcasting he'd be a News Anchor in nothing flat. Probably replace Jake Tapper.

[Andrew Mason]

Dear danny BOY o'meara,

It's too bad that you put so much emphasis on what the startled-and-traumatized witlessness said or didn't say after the tragic event.

-- Tom

How is it that these ‘startled and traumatized” people were able to accurately recall the number of shots,  how JFK reacted, what happened on the third shot, and how is it that many accurately identified the location of the source? Why is it just the recollection of where JFK was when the first shot sounded and whether JFK reacted to it that confused them?