JFK Dictabelt Recording

[Raine Hannula]

Dictabelt recording update is coming in someday

[John Corbett]

One thing what I have not figured out from the Kennedy assassination is that what was Kennedy so bad that Texas people hated him so much that they decided to kill him

If we look at how much people were involved in the Kennedy assassination, tells you that Kennedy was so hated in Teksas and Dallas that they decided to killed him.

Only one man in Texas decided to kill JFK and he never told us why. I guess we're SOL on that issue.

[Michael T. Griffith]

1. McLain's bike was too far back.
2. According to the bike expert and actual rider, McClain, he said motor sound on the dictabelt is from a three wheeled bike.
3. Sheriff Bill Decker saying "hold everything secure" in the exact place where the shots supposedly occurred. Yet Decker was known to have said "hold everything secure" about a minute after the real shots in Dealey Plaza.

Once again you are years behind the information curve. Every one of those claims was refuted years ago.

Steve Barber as seen below is the actual expert on the dictabelt evidence and Steve's initial interest came from when he heard the "hold everything secure" from a recording of the dictabelt and these words were proven to have come way after Dealey Plaza! Go Steve, Go!

So Steve Barber, a drummer, is your "actual expert" on the acoustical evidence?!

How about the HSCA's acoustical experts: BBN's Dr. James Barger, Dr. Jared Wolf, Dr. Scott Robinson, and Dr. Edward Schmidt, and Queen's College's Dr. Mark Weiss and Professor Ernest Aschkenasy? How would you compare Barber's credentials in acoustical science with those of the six HSCA acoustical scientists?

Barber's responses to Dr. Don Thomas's articles on the acoustical evidence are downright laughable.

How about BBN acoustical scientist Dr. Richard Mullen? Dr. Mullen did new research on the acoustical evidence at the request of Dr. Josiah Thompson and proved conclusively with pattern-cross-correlation (PCC) analysis that the Decker "hold everything" transmission is not crosstalk but is an overdub created during the copying process, rendering it irrelevant, and that the Fisher "I'll check" transmission is genuine crosstalk, which proves the gunshot impulse patterns were recorded during the assassination.

Dr. Thompson devotes over 100 pages to this historic new research in his 2020 book Last Second in Dallas. Dr. Mullen wrote Appendix B, ​"Signal Processing Results for Both DPD Audio Files," in the book. Dr. Barger wrote Appendix A, "A​ Quantitative Analysis of Crosstalk Found in Audio Recorded During the JFK Assassination," in the book.

I have pointed out all these facts to you in other threads, but you just ignore and repeat your outdated claims about the acoustical evidence.

The following passages come from Reclaiming History and McClain the actual man behind the supposed Dealey Plaza recording, strongly refutes this deceptive "audio evidence".[SNIP]

Bugliosi blundered all over the place because he didn't understand what he was reading and was determined to reject the acoustical evidence no matter what.

You realize that not one of the members of the NRC/NAS panel that critiqued the acoustical evidence was an acoustical scientist, right? Right?

You realize that the NRC/NAS panel admitted that there's a 93% probability that the timing-movement correlations identified by the BBN scientists between the dictabelt and the recording of the test firing in Dealey Plaza occurred because the dictabelt recorded gunfire in Dealey Plaza, right?

You realize that the NRC/NAS panel admitted there's a 77.7% probability that the 144.9 impulse pattern, identified by Weiss and Aschkenasy as gunfire from the grassy knoll, was in fact gunfire from the knoll, right?

All of this, and much more, flew right over Bugliosi's head, or he just chose to ignore it, just as you keep doing.

For those who want to read the other side of the story on the acoustical evidence, I highly recommend Dr. Thompson's book, and also the following online articles:

"The HSCA’s Acoustical Evidence: Proof of a Second Gunman in the JFK Assassination," by yours truly.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1KvdvH8gTqFgMn-2vTI5ppg_egWxRKg9U/view

“Debugging Bugliosi,” by Dr. Don Thomas, https://www.maryferrell.org/pages/Essay_-
_Debugging_Bugliosi.html.

“Overview and History of the Acoustical Evidence in the Kennedy Assassination Case,” by Dr. Don Thomas
https://www.maryferrell.org/pages/Essay_-_Acoustics_Overview_and_History.html
https://www.maryferrell.org/pages/Essay_-_Acoustics_Overview_and_History_-_part_2.html
https://www.maryferrell.org/pages/Essay_-_Acoustics_Overview_and_History_-_part_3.html

“Sabato, Sonalysts, and Sophistry,” 2014, by Dr. Don Thomas
https://www.maryferrell.org/pages/Essay_-_Sabato_Sonalysts_Sophistry.html.

Another excellent analysis of the acoustical evidence is Dr. David Kaiser's lengthy discussion on the subject in his highly acclaimed book The Road to Dallas (pp. 377-387).

[John Corbett]

Bugliosi blundered all over the place because he didn't understand what he was reading and was determined to reject the acoustical evidence no matter what.

You are determined to cling to the acoustics "evidence" no matter what. Not surprising given that you have no real evidence to support your cause.

[Steve M. Galbraith]

You are determined to cling to the acoustics "evidence" no matter what. Not surprising given that you have no real evidence to support your cause.

Michael Griffith says there was a shooter on top of the linen truck. And that "possibly" the Babushka Lady shot JFK with a gun camera (or camera gun, whatever). And he believes Garrison's claims about triangulated fire, the plan developed by Ferrie, Shaw and Oswald that was then supposedly carried out by the CIA. And the Mob. And others. And he believes JFK was shot from the front in the head. And shot from the front in the neck.

But the HSCA acoustics analysis, which he also says he believes, concluded there were two shooters: one shooting from the TSBD and a second from behind the fence. Two shooters. Four shots.

Nothing in their analysis - which again he says he believes - concluded there was a shooter on the linen truck. Or that Babushka Lady fired a shot. Or that there were shooters from three locations, i.e., triangulation, or a shooter from the front who shot JFK the neck/throat and a shooter or a shot from the front who inflicted the head wound.

His arguments are a mish mash of claims and counter-claims and arguments that contradict other arguments. His conspiracy is a jumble of ideas and thoughts and allegations that make no sense, are at odds with each other. It's like he's playing "JFK Assassination: the Game" where the person who propose the most claims, whether they make sense or not, somehow wins.

[John Corbett]

Michael Griffith says there was a shooter on top of the linen truck. And that "possibly" the Babushka Lady shot JFK with a gun camera (or camera gun, whatever). And he believes Garrison's claims about triangulated fire, the plan developed by Ferrie, Shaw and Oswald that was then supposedly carried out by the CIA. And the Mob. And others. And he believes JFK was shot from the front in the head. And shot from the front in the neck.

But the HSCA acoustics analysis, which he also says he believes, concluded there were two shooters: one shooting from the TSBD and a second from behind the fence. Two shooters. Four shots.

Nothing in their analysis - which again he says he believes - concluded there was a shooter on the linen truck. Or that Babushka Lady fired a shot. Or that there were shooters from three locations, i.e., triangulation, or a shooter from the front who shot JFK the neck/throat and a shooter or a shot from the front who inflicted the head wound.

His arguments are a mish mash of claims and counter-claims and arguments that contradict other arguments. His conspiracy is a jumble of ideas and thoughts and allegations that make no sense, are at odds with each other. It's like he's playing "JFK Assassination: the Game" where the person who propose the most claims, whether they make sense or not, somehow wins.

As I recall, MTG has hinted at a shot from Dal-Tex as well. It's amazing with all those shooters, JFK was only hit twice. Or by MTG's count, 3 tines. Talk about The Gang That Couldn't Shoot Straight. I wonder if there has ever been a conspiracy theory proposed that he wouldn't wrap both arms around. As long as it conflicts with the conclusions of the WC, MTG will embrace it. He doesn't even care if these various alternative scenarios are even compatible with one another. If someone proposes something that is at odds with the WCR, MTC will buy into it. He seems to have no filter when it comes to JFKA nonsense.

[Steve M. Galbraith]

As I recall, MTG has hinted at a shot from Dal-Tex as well. It's amazing with all those shooters, JFK was only hit twice. Or by MTG's count, 3 tines. Talk about The Gang That Couldn't Shoot Straight. I wonder if there has ever been a conspiracy theory proposed that he wouldn't wrap both arms around. As long as it conflicts with the conclusions of the WC, MTG will embrace it. He doesn't even care if these various alternative scenarios are even compatible with one another. If someone proposes something that is at odds with the WCR, MTC will buy into it. He seems to have no filter when it comes to JFKA nonsense.

It's endless. He said there was another shooter (a fourth? fifth? sixth shooter?) on top of the linen truck that was parked at the corner of Elm and Houston (below). So someone climbed up on or got out of the truck and in broad daylight with people around fired a shot. Then he got off the truck and left.