How Did Bart Kamp Create The Lovelady Image?

[Brian Doyle]

Kamp is being re-introduced to The Education Forum in a full Andrew Iler-endorsed glittering Cinderella carriage...The other ROKC knuckleheads are piling out of that glorified clown car and on to the forum...DiEugenio is his sponsoring Lord straight back from selling the Prayer Man hoax to Congress...

[Royell Storing]

O'Meara wrote:

 "This is the Sprague image below.
Do you notice the light square around the two men?
What do you think that is?"



I think it is a technical lightening feature Kamp inserted to emphasize who was being looked at...It has nothing to do with the photographic quality of the Sprague copy...

I believe the plaid pattern could be replicated in either the original Couch Film or 6th Floor Museum copy of Darnell...

Larsen proved the plaid pattern in Lovelady's shirt in Sprague matched the plaid pattern on his shirt in other photos exactly...Larsen, after I told him that proved the timing of when Frazier said he was talking to Stanton on the steps, then went back and deleted his post on The Education Forum showing that match...This is a prime example of the playing field that currently exists on the JFK internet...

                                              " I THINK it is a technical lightening feature Kamp inserted to emphasize who was being looked at................."

                  If you are going to swear by that Sprague Image, YOU need to KNOW what exactly has been done to the image. Obviously you do Not. This is the problem with you Ed Forum Guys. You "blow off" without knowing what you are talking about.

[Brian Doyle]

Which is just saying something strongly without really saying anything...


I'm sure if we rose to your bait and investigated the lighter box around Lovelady & Shelley it would just be a simple highlighting box and not change anything...

[Royell Storing]

Which is just saying something strongly without really saying anything...


I'm sure if we rose to your bait and investigated the lighter box around Lovelady & Shelley it would just be a simple highlighting box and not change anything...

   If YOU are going to base your case on the Sprague Image, YOU should have already, ".....investigated the lighter box around Lovelady & Shelley". This is Not the Ed Forum.

[Brian Doyle]

   If YOU are going to base your case on the Sprague Image, YOU should have already, ".....investigated the lighter box around Lovelady & Shelley". This is Not the Ed Forum.

Holding up a hoop and hurdle for others to jump through does not sound research make...

The person who lacks here the most is the one who has violated his own so-called standards and failed to show the highlight box was anything other than a highlight box...

[Royell Storing]

Holding up a hoop and hurdle for others to jump through does not sound research make...

The person who lacks here the most is the one who has violated his own so-called standards and failed to show the highlight box was anything other than a highlight box...

    Do you know what the title of this thread is?

[Brian Doyle]

I am at a loss because the research community is geared towards dishonesty and hiding of evidence...

Sandy Larsen decided to delete his excellent photo analysis of Lovelady's plaid pattern because I told him it proved the timing of when Frazier was talking to Stanton...Larsen took one look at Couch/Darnell and realized Frazier was talking to Prayer Man at that moment and that he had refuted himself...So instead of admitting I was correct Larsen took the low route and deleted his analysis of Lovelady's plaid pattern...

This is the research community Iler now enforces and no one said a word when Larsen deleted his own proof...