NEW ARTICLE: JFK's Clothing Proves the Single-Bullet Theory Is Impossible

[Andrew Mason]

Dr Shires has no problem understanding what he meant, but obviously you do.

Shires used "tangential" and I used "oblique".  Shires explained that the bullet entered the thigh at a shallow angle, which is what I am saying as well.  That is apparent from the wound on the skin surface. What is important is not the terminology but the description.  Don't take my word for it. Take his:


A bullet cannot penetrate a surface if its trajectory is perfectly tangential to the surface.  The trajectory has to be at an angle greater than zero.  You seem to have difficulty with that concept.

[Jack Nessan]

Shires used "tangential" and I used "oblique".  Shires explained that the bullet entered the thigh at a shallow angle, which is what I am saying as well.  That is apparent from the wound on the skin surface. What is important is not the terminology but the description.  Don't take my word for it. Take his:


A bullet cannot penetrate a surface if its trajectory is perfectly tangential to the surface.  The trajectory has to be at an angle greater than zero.  You seem to have difficulty with that concept.

Wow This whole goofy theory does not work at all, and this is your focus?

The world really should thank you. All this theory has produced is the realization that SBT is not only the correct answer, but it is also the only answer. A theory with two bullets that vanished and who knows what with the fragmented other one, has absolutely no value at all. This theory does not provide an answer to a single issue or explain the known evidence into any viable coherent understanding. Nor does it incorporate the evidence into a coherent answer of the wounds in even the remotest sense of understanding of how they occurred. Actually, it is absolutely unbelievable, but thanks for proving SBT beyond any doubt at all for everyone.