NEW ARTICLE: JFK's Clothing Proves the Single-Bullet Theory Is Impossible

[Lance Payette]

History is full of examples of carefully planned criminal schemes that were discovered because seemingly minor items of damning evidence were overlooked. Yet, we have WC true believers in this very thread making the silly argument that we can ignore the hard physical evidence of the clothing because any JFK murder plot would have been perfect, all-knowing, and all-powerful, and would not have left behind any evidence that could expose it.

Nice try, but you have this exactly backwards. I have stated that forensic accident and crime scene reconstruction is full of improbabilities, inconsistencies and things that don't quite fit. It's to be expected.

YOU have these "seemingly minor items of damning evidence" being overlooked by conspirators who had two caskets and two autopsies, altered the body, faked x-rays, faked photos, destroyed the brain, fabricated CE 399, threatened and intimidated doctors, lied under oath, and engaged in a massive cover-up that sounds more like science fiction than real life. Indeed, YOU posit conspirators who are pretty much "all-knowing and all-powerful" - except when they conveniently (for CTers) turn into the Three Stooges again and again.

These damn near omnipotent conspirators FORGOT ABOUT THE HOLES IN THE CLOTHING while they were switching caskets, altering the body and whatnot!!! Is that plausible, given YOUR OWN scenario? With possibly the most obvious and easy to manipulate evidence - the clothing - the conspiratorial geniuses just had a massive brain fart and completely overlooked it, all the way from the FBI Lab to the National Archives? They left it right there in the open for CT geniuses like Michael T. Griffith and Cliff Varnell to recognize it was IMPOSSIBLE to square with the LN narrative (even though an awful lot of experts and even some of their fellow CTers disagree). Ya think? (Well, yes, you do - that's the scary part.)

I have no problem with the holes in the clothing raising questions. It's to be expected and casts no real doubt on the LN narrative. The more you and Cliff shout IMPOSSIBLE, the less credible you appear.

[David Von Pein]

IN 2017, SANDY LARSEN SAID:

I haven't yet encountered an LNer who gives a damn about the question, "HOW DID THE MAGIC BULLET PASS THROUGH THE KNOT OF THE TIE WITHOUT MAKING A HOLE?"


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

But don't you have the exact same problem if the bullet ENTERED the throat (versus it EXITING the throat)?

Don't the CTers who think JFK's throat wound was an ENTRANCE wound still have to ask themselves the very same question you just asked me? I.E.,

"HOW DID THE BULLET PASS THROUGH THE KNOT OF THE TIE WITHOUT MAKING A HOLE?"

How does the belief that the throat wound was a wound of entry make the above question go away for the conspiracy theorists? Do they think if the bullet entered the Adam's Apple area of JFK's throat, it somehow was able to miss the tie knot area entirely? But if it exited there, it had no choice but go through the tie knot and create a hole? Is that it?

Much More:

https://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2017/04/jfk-assassination-arguments-part-1244.html#JFK's-Necktie