NEW ARTICLE: JFK's Clothing Proves the Single-Bullet Theory Is Impossible

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: NEW ARTICLE: JFK's Clothing Proves the Single-Bullet Theory Is Impossible  (Read 36338 times)

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2111
Advertisement
You don't seem to understand that 132 people stating that they heard three distinct shots is evidence of three shots.  Just because you don't think they are accurate or reliable doesn't affect the fact that it is evidence.

How is it evidence?

Again, you are simply making my point.  The witnesses gave evidence that there were three shots. Your suggestion that they really meant they heard only two does not change the fact that they all stated that they heard three shots, so it is evidence that three shots occurred.  You just don't attribute any weight to the evidence.

You have no point and no evidence, just pretending this is evidence, nothing more. If you had real evidence, you would present it.

I do not see the difference between you and M Griffith. Maybe you can explain what the difference is.
 
I am saying that the Connallys stated that JBC was hit by the second shot.  This does not necessarily mean that he was only hit by the second shot because he never felt the thigh wound or the wrist wound.

Huh. So, you are now saying he was struck by the first shot in the back and leg. I think this is progress. I have seen so many odd versions of this it is hard to say.

What you are really stating is you really have no idea what is going on. You have officially run out of this weird and bizarre nonsense. This is nothing more than the crap tank running on empty. Really you decide when a person feels being shot. This version of your story has finally gone completely off the rails; it is one of your best.

A Mason:

JBC yelling "oh, no, no" was not necessarily in response to being hit.  Nellie said that he uttered this after the first shot and before the second shot. [/b]

 Wrong, it was entirely in response to having been shot.


Since he did not feel the thigh wound (and that is not uncommon especially when wounded in an extremity), and since a straight line trajectory through JFK's neck at the time of the first shot just after z186 goes to JBC's left side, I suggest that the first shot could have caused JBC's thigh wound.

Suggest it all you want; this is beyond ridiculous to even post this.

JBC could not have been more clear as to when he was hit. JBC crying out Oh No No No was solely in response to him having been hit. Jackie and Nellie identify it as having   been from the first shot.

Governor CONNALLY.... “I immediately, when I was hit, I said, "Oh, no, no, no." And then I said, "My God, they are going to kill us all." Nellie, when she pulled me over into her lap----”

You guys need to realize that, having heard Oswald's first missing-everything shot about two seconds earlier (at hypothetical "Z-124"), JBC consciously reacted to it by starting to turn to his right at Z-165, hoping to catch a glimpse of JFK over his right shoulder. By the time he'd turned far enough to do so, however, JFK had raised his right hand to wave to somebody and had turned his head to his far right, and therefore JBC couldn't "see" him. Still wondering if JFK was okay, JBC started turning back to his left to try to catch a glimpse of him over his left shoulder but only got halfway there when he and JFK were both hit by Oswald's second bullet, CE-399. CE-399, at some point between Z-222 and Z-224, caused seven wounds in the two men and ended up being temporarily embedded in JBC's right thigh.

https://assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/
« Last Edit: Today at 07:05:01 AM by Tom Graves »

JFK Assassination Forum