The Three Small Puncture Wounds in JFK's Right Cheek: Proof of a Second Gunman

[Tommy Shanks]

The only way to believe that those wounds existed is to cherry-pick Robinson's statement to Horne then filter out the rest of the universe.

Excellent point, Mitch. This is the only solution for the alarming amount of people who believe all of the films, photos and records from the autopsy were altered or fakes.

[Mitch Todd]

Excellent point, Mitch. This is the only solution for the alarming amount of people who believe all of the films, photos and records from the autopsy were altered or fakes.

Even more than that. In the end, they start building an entire alternate reality.

[Royell Storing]

  Mortician Tom Robinson said he stretched a large patch over the HOLE in the Back of JFK's Head. In a court of law, lawyers regard the testimony of a highly qualified witness such as this as a Slam Dunk!

[Jarrett Smith]

  Mortician Tom Robinson said he stretched a large patch over the HOLE in the Back of JFK's Head. In a court of law, lawyers regard the testimony of a highly qualified witness such as this as a Slam Dunk!

LN's cannot accept the fact there was a hole in the back of his head. My opinion is the autopsy photo showing the back intact was taken after the procedure when the scalp was sutured shut.

[Tom Graves]

LN's cannot accept the fact there was a hole in the back of his head. My opinion is the autopsy photo showing the back intact was taken after the procedure when the scalp was sutured shut.

How many bad guys do you figure were involved, altogether, in the planning, the "patsy-ing," the shooting, the getting-away, the planting of false evidence, the altering of photos / films / x-rays, and the all-important (and ongoing!) coverup?

Just a few, or oodles and gobs?

[Royell Storing]

 We have: (1) Parkland Hospital Dr's reporting a Wound in the BACK of JFK's Head immediately following the Kill Shot, & (2) Mortician Tom Robinson detailing to the ARRB that he placed a Patch over a Wound in the BACK of JFK's Head immediately following the Bethesda Autopsy. This corroborates a wound in the back of JFK's head. 

[Michael T. Griffith]

MG: mortician Tom Robinson noticed three small puncture wounds in JFK's right cheek.

In his HSCA testimony with Purdy, Robinson said that the only wounds to JFK's head were the large gaping wound and a single small wound in the hairline of the right temple, which ascribed to being caused by a fragment. He was asked about any other wounds and said no. Three wounds to JFK's face would be clearly visible to everyone else in the morgue, yet no one else at the autopsy saw anything like that. Nor do these wounds show up in the autopsy photos, as you've sorta noticed.. The only way to believe that those wounds existed is to cherry-pick Robinson's statement to Horne then filter out the rest of the universe.

More of your sophistry, misleading omissions, and flimsy rejection of evidence that you can't explain. You failed to mention that Robinson only noticed the three small puncture wounds after the autopsy was over and when embalming fluid was then put into the body and some of the fluid began leaking from the three small cheek punctures and slight discoloration began to appear around the punctures. Did you just miss these statements? Humm?

So the three small puncture wounds would not have been "clearly visible to everyone else in the morgue." Again, Robinson only noticed them after the autopsy ended, when embalming fluid began to leak from the punctures and when they began to become slightly discolored.

Robinson also explained that the punctures don't show up in the right-superior profile photo because the photo is of poor quality ("because of the photo's poor quality"). Gee, did you just miss this statement too?

Robinson noticed the small wound in the right temple, but the autopsy report says nothing about it. Robinson, along with nearly everyone else at the autopsy, also saw the large back-of-head wound, but it has vanished from the autopsy photos, is obscured on the autopsy x-rays, and is not mentioned in the autopsy report.

You seem to have a habit of trying to mislead readers by omitting key information, or at least that's how it appears to me. I don't know how you could have missed the above-mentioned statements or thought they weren't worth mentioning.

For those who want to read the entire ARRB summary of the Robinson interview, here's a link to it:

https://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/arrb/master_med_set/md180/html/md180_0001a.htm

The fact that Robinson did not mention the three small punctures in his HSCA interview proves nothing. Are you implying that he lied to the ARRB about them? Robinson may simply not have thought to mention them in his HSCA interview since the focus was on the visible wounds to JFK's head and since he didn't notice the tiny punctures until after the autopsy. Witnesses quite frequently remember certain things in one interview that they forgot to mention in another interview.

WC apologists don't want to admit there were three small puncture wounds in JFK's right cheek because they know they have no way to explain them.

[Royell Storing]

MG: mortician Tom Robinson noticed three small puncture wounds in JFK's right cheek.

In his HSCA testimony with Purdy, Robinson said that the only wounds to JFK's head were the large gaping wound and a single small wound in the hairline of the right temple, which ascribed to being caused by a fragment. He was asked about any other wounds and said no. Three wounds to JFK's face would be clearly visible to everyone else in the morgue, yet no one else at the autopsy saw anything like that. Nor do these wounds show up in the autopsy photos, as you've sorta noticed.. The only way to believe that those wounds existed is to cherry-pick Robinson's statement to Horne then filter out the rest of the universe.

   "HSCA TESTIMONY........"?  Is anyone aware of Tom Robinson being sworn in and giving "HSCA TESTIMONY"?  Maybe what is being attributed to Tom Robinson was an HSCA "interview" of some kind? Nothing attributed to Tom Robinson above, is enclosed in quotation marks. This further makes me believe we are looking at someone's Reader's Digest condensed version of a possible HSCA "interview" of Robinson.