WC-FBI Suppressed NAA Evidence that Oswald Did NOT Fire a Rifle on 11/22/63

[Jack Nessan]

And Cunningham said the FBI didn't use the test because it was not reliable.

Mr. EISENBERG. To rephrase it, if the FBI is having an investigation by itself in a matter it has primary jurisdiction over, will it use the paraffin test?
Mr. CUNNINGHAM. No; not the paraffin-chemical test.
Mr. CUNNINGHAM: It is the feeling that it is definitely not reliable as to determining whether or not a person has fired a weapon.

This takes all of 60 seconds of "research" to find.

Griffith's conspiracy thinking, how he connects dots and looks at evidence, is revealed in his belief that Sirhan was "hypnoprogrammed" to shoot RFK. Yes, hypnoprogrammed.

Here's his reasoning:
(1) The government investigated mind control capabilities, e.g., MK-Ultra;
(2) Sirhan said he couldn't remember what happened during the shooting;
(3) Conclusion: Sirhan was a victim of (1) the mind control program.

In the conspiracy mind that's all that is needed.

This takes all of 60 seconds of "research" to find.

Spot on. It does not seem to take much effort to unravel his thinking. It has become more like a hobby.

[Michael T. Griffith]

And Cunningham said the FBI didn't use the test because it was not reliable.

Mr. EISENBERG. To rephrase it, if the FBI is having an investigation by itself in a matter it has primary jurisdiction over, will it use the paraffin test?
Mr. CUNNINGHAM. No; not the paraffin-chemical test.
Mr. CUNNINGHAM: It is the feeling that it is definitely not reliable as to determining whether or not a person has fired a weapon.

This takes all of 60 seconds of "research" to find.

And it takes all of 10 seconds of "reading" to understand that Cunningham was not talking about the Oak Ridge NAA testing on Oswald's paraffin cast, and that he also wasn't talking about the Oakwood control test that proved that NAA was 100% reliable in detecting nitrate traces in the paraffin cast of every single riflemen who participated in the test.

That's why the FBI spent years and millions in legal fees fighting Weisberg and Lesar's lawsuit to obtain the Oakridge NAA raw data.

Griffith's conspiracy thinking, how he connects dots and looks at evidence, is revealed in his belief that Sirhan was "hypnoprogrammed" to shoot RFK. Yes, hypnoprogrammed.

Here's his reasoning:
(1) The government investigated mind control capabilities, e.g., MK-Ultra;
(2) Sirhan said he couldn't remember what happened during the shooting;
(3) Conclusion: Sirhan was a victim of (1) the mind control program.

In the conspiracy mind that's all that is needed.

Hey, this is 2025, FYI. You are years behind the information curve. As I've told you before, one of the world's leading experts on hypnosis, Dr. Daniel Brown of Harvard University, interviewed and tested Sirhan for years, and concluded that Sirhan was hypno-programmed to fire at RFK, and that this was why Sirhan had no memory of shooting RFK and why he could not remember several key periods of time leading up to the assassination. Dr. Brown provided a detailed report on his findings in his sworn statement for Sirhan's 2011 appeal.

Dr. Herbert Spiegel, a New York psychiatrist and world-renowned expert on hypnosis who teaches at Columbia University, has likewise concluded that "Sirhan was probably programmed through hypnosis to fire a gun in the presence of Sen. Robert F. Kennedy without knowing what he was doing and without being able to recall either the events or the process of being programmed" (https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2005-feb-05-le-textbooks5.3-story.html).

I again recommend the video The Real Manchurian Candidate, which is available on YouTube (

In the video, Dr. Brown explains his years-long examination of Sirhan and his conclusion that Sirhan was hypno-programmed to shoot RFK and not to remember doing so and being programmed to do so.

And, uh, yes, the government did have a mind-control program. In our previous exchange, I cited two scholarly books on the program. Did you read either of them? Let me guess. . . .

[John Mytton]

This may be the state of things on your planet, or in your alternate reality, but down here on Earth, in this reality, your version of the JFK assassination continues to be rejected by 2/3 to 3/4 of the Western world.

And exactly what tiny fraction of the "2/3 to 3/4 of the Western world" have actually read the Warren Report and from there how many have even heard of the twenty six volumes and from this infinitesimally teeny-weeny sample, how many have actually read even 1 page of the twenty six volumes??

BTW, huge numbers of people believe that the Earth is flat, 9/11 was an inside job, we never went to the Moon and we are ruled by Alien shape shifting Lizard people but surely you don't believe in any of that, or do you? Well actually from your far out JFK conspiracy theories, I wouldn't be surprised to learn that you believe in all of the above!

JohnM

[Michael T. Griffith]

And exactly what tiny fraction of the "2/3 to 3/4 of the Western world" have actually read the Warren Report and from there how many have even heard of the twenty six volumes and from this infinitesimally teeny-weeny sample, how many have actually read even 1 page of the twenty six volumes??

And exactly what tiny fraction of the 1/4 to 1/3 of the people in the Western world who agree with your version of the shooting--how many of them have read even half of the Warren Report, much less any of the 26 volumes of hearings and exhibits? Hey?

BTW, huge numbers of people believe . . . that 9/11 was an inside job, . . .

Oh, dear. I guess you don't know that the percentage of the Western world that still buys your lone-gunman theory is about the same as the percentage of people who believe that 9/11 was an inside job! Congrats! I'm guessing you weren't aware of this.

huge numbers of people believe that the Earth is flat, 9/11 was an inside job we never went to the Moon and we are ruled by Alien shape shifting Lizard people. . . . but surely you don't believe in any of that, or do you? Well actually from your far out JFK conspiracy theories, I wouldn't be surprised to learn that you believe in all of the above!

"Huge numbers" of people do not believe those things. Indeed, again, the percentage of people who still believe the lone-gunman theory is about the same as the percentage of people who believe 9/11 was an inside job.

In fact, polling data show that as many as 20% of Americans have expressed doubt about the Moon landings, which is not too far below the percentage of people who agree with you on the JFK shooting! Congrats again!

Just look at the unserious arguments you are making in response to the control-test verified scientific evidence that Oswald did not fire a rifle on 11/22. You guys are so emotionally committed to the lone-gunman theory that you can't bring yourselves to deal rationally and credible with facts that refute the theory.