JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
The Entrance Wound in the Throat, the Front Shirt Slits, and Tie Knot Nick
Royell Storing:
So they run an inept "investigation" where every single witness inside TR1 is Not interviewed regarding the condition of the JFK Body, and You want to hold that against people that do interview these eyewitnesses 60 yrs later? This is also why the SS had to steal the JFK Body. They needed to erase the condition of the JFK Body as witnessed by the Parkland Dr's only minutes after the Kill Shot.
Tom Graves:
--- Quote from: Royell Storing on August 02, 2025, 05:34:12 PM ---So they run an inept "investigation" where every single witness inside TR1 is Not interviewed regarding the condition of the JFK Body, and You want to hold that against people that do interview these eyewitnesses 60 yrs later? This is also why the SS had to steal the JFK Body. They needed to erase the condition of the JFK Body as witnessed by the Parkland Dr's only minutes after the Kill Shot.
--- End quote ---
You're so full of beans, Storing.
Royell Storing:
--- Quote from: Tom Graves on August 02, 2025, 05:50:17 PM ---You're so full of beans, Storing.
--- End quote ---
If that is the best rebuttal you got, I must have presented a very compelling case. Thank you.
Tom Graves:
--- Quote from: Royell Storing on August 03, 2025, 04:13:50 PM ---If that is the best rebuttal you got, I must have presented a very compelling case. Thank you.
--- End quote ---
LOL!
The probability of your presenting a compelling case regarding any aspect of the JFK assassination, Storing, is about the same as Donald Trump's releasing the complete and unredacted (except for identifying information about the victims) Epstein Files.
Michael T. Griffith:
--- Quote from: Mitch Todd on August 02, 2025, 05:22:00 PM ---I cherry-picked nothing. . . .
--- End quote ---
Yes, you did. Dr. Carrico told the WC that the throat wound was above the tie:
Dulles: Will you show us about where it was?
Dr. Carrico: Just about where your tie would be.
Dulles: Where did it enter?
Dr. Carrico: It entered?
Dulles: Yes.
Dr. Carrico: At the time we did not know --
Dulles: I see.
Dr. Carrico: The entrance. All we knew this was a small wound here.
Dulles: I see. And you put your hand right above where your tie is?
Dr. Carrico: Yes, sir. (3 H 361-362)
When Carrico spoke with Harold Weisberg in 1975, he confirmed that the throat wound was above the collar; he was “definite on this” (Weisberg, Never Again, 2007 edition, p. 241). Weisberg continued:
When I asked him if he saw any bullet holes in the shirt or tie, he was
definite in saying “No.” I asked if he recalled Dulles’s question and his
own pointing to above his own shirt collar as the location of the bullet hole.
He does remember this, and he does remember confirming that the hole
was above the collar. . . . (Never Again, p. 242)
Carrico also told Weisberg that the nurses used scalpels to remove the president’s shirt and tie because they were, understandably, in a big hurry, and that it was “likely” that the nurses made the slits and the nick in the tie, adding, “I saw neither the nick in the tie nor the cuts in the shirt before the nurses started cutting” (Weisberg, Post Mortem, pp. 375-376; http://jfk.hood.edu/Collection/Weisberg%20Subject%20Index%20Files/N%20Disk/New%20York%20Times/Item%2093.pdf, p. 4; https://www.google.com/books/edition/Matrix_for_Assassination/SC-wBAAAQBAJ?q=&gbpv=1#f=true, pp. 95-96; http://jfk.hood.edu/Collection/Book Images/Never Again - Draft/Never Again Draft.pdf, p. 14)
Rockefeller Foundation fellow Henry Hurt, in his book Reasonable Doubt, notes that one of the nurses confirmed that nurses made the shirt slits when they hurriedly cut away JFK’s tie and shirt (p. 60).
--- Quote from: Mitch Todd on August 02, 2025, 05:22:00 PM ---The interviews with Jones and Goldstritch were made 60 years after the fact, and their memories have had decades to decay and be infiltrated by external factors. The WC testimony of Perry, Jones, Carrico, et al, was taken mere months after the assassination when the events in question still lay fresh in their minds. The only real reason to prefer the decades-later recollections over the 1964 testimony is an irrational desire to believe the latter accounts. You could also show us independent confirmation that Goldstritch was ever in TR1. He's one of those guys who just sort of pop out of nowhere years and years later.
--- End quote ---
So is it just a whopping coincidence that Jones and Goldstrich's descriptions of the wound's location match exactly what Dr. Carrico told the WC and then Harold Weisberg about the wound's location?
Goldstrich didn't "just sort of pop out of nowhere years and years later." You haven't watched the Paramount documentary, have you? Nobody but a diehard SBT believer would believe that Goldstrich fabricated his account. By the way, when Goldstrich was interviewed again in 2023, he said he is "almost certain" the throat wound was an entrance wound, and he noted that JFK had a large wound in the back of his head:
"I am now almost certain that it is an entrance wound. This should have been obvious
to me sooner because the wound at the back of the head was too large to ever be
considered an entrance wound." (https://www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/exclusives/107504)
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version