A Question for Royell Storing

Author Topic: A Question for Royell Storing  (Read 722 times)

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1287
Re: A Question for Royell Storing
« Reply #8 on: June 19, 2025, 01:51:49 AM »
Advertisement
For starters, I do not believe that is the only thing wrong with the Z film. 

Storing,

In that case, let's take it one issue at a time, shall we?

Question #1: What incriminating evidence did the bad guys eliminate by editing-out about five seconds of footage between Z-132 and Z-133?


JFK Assassination Forum

Re: A Question for Royell Storing
« Reply #8 on: June 19, 2025, 01:51:49 AM »


Offline Jake Maxwell

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 601
Re: A Question for Royell Storing
« Reply #9 on: June 19, 2025, 03:22:10 AM »





Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1287
Re: A Question for Royell Storing
« Reply #10 on: June 19, 2025, 03:25:04 AM »
[...]

Maxwell,

Do you see any highly encrypted CIA messages in Holland's photo?
« Last Edit: June 19, 2025, 03:44:51 AM by Tom Graves »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: A Question for Royell Storing
« Reply #10 on: June 19, 2025, 03:25:04 AM »


Offline Jake Maxwell

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 601
Re: A Question for Royell Storing
« Reply #11 on: June 19, 2025, 03:28:41 AM »

I'm sure it's in there somewhere!

A comical Holland pose... ;)

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1287
Re: A Question for Royell Storing
« Reply #12 on: June 19, 2025, 03:38:57 AM »
I'm sure it's in there somewhere!

A comical Holland pose...


Maybe there's an encrypted message embedded in it to The Ghost of Evil, Evil, Evil Allen Dulles which, when properly decrypted, says, "Boy oh boy, I sure hope Jake "Eagle Eye" Maxwell doesn't uncover the top-secret mission you gave me in our never-ending effort to expand the Military Industrial Intelligence-Community Complex, aka The Deep State, aka The National Security State!"
« Last Edit: June 19, 2025, 03:42:49 AM by Tom Graves »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: A Question for Royell Storing
« Reply #12 on: June 19, 2025, 03:38:57 AM »


Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3519
Re: A Question for Royell Storing
« Reply #13 on: June 20, 2025, 04:28:00 PM »
Storing,

In that case, let's take it one issue at a time, shall we?

Question #1: What incriminating evidence did the bad guys eliminate by editing-out about five seconds of footage between Z-132 and Z-133?

   You're limiting what might have been on the opening 5 seconds of the Zapruder Film to, "Incriminating evidence". How about "Exonerating evidence"? This is a Major Problem that you and others have. You are looking for that Big Reveal of "incriminating evidence" that unveils a shooter, rifle, gun smoke, Bush Sr, Jack Ruby, etc. STOP narrowing your research to unearthing some sort of "Case Breaker". Little things lead to big things. Gather legit facts whether they are related to each other or not. At a future point in time, you just might find a "Rosetta Stone" that connects them.

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1287
Re: A Question for Royell Storing
« Reply #14 on: June 20, 2025, 08:45:32 PM »
You're limiting what might have been on the opening 5 seconds of the Zapruder Film to, "Incriminating evidence". How about "Exonerating evidence"? This is a Major Problem that you and others have. You are looking for that Big Reveal of "incriminating evidence" that unveils a shooter, rifle, gun smoke, Bush Sr, Jack Ruby, etc. STOP narrowing your research to unearthing some sort of "Case Breaker". Little things lead to big things. Gather legit facts whether they are related to each other or not. At a future point in time, you just might find a "Rosetta Stone" that connects them.

Storing,

Fine.

What's the "exonerating evidence" that the bad guys deleted from the Zapruder film immediately before Z-133?

Oswald's standing on the corner and waving to JFK and Jackie as they passed by?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: A Question for Royell Storing
« Reply #14 on: June 20, 2025, 08:45:32 PM »