John Mytton makes up excuses then casts lame straw man arguments. JR Malley, Paul Bentley, & Capt. Fritz.
No bullets in his pocket when arrested. Uh-Oh !
For a start learn what a strawman is before you embarrass yourself even further.
Anyway your post is unintentionally hilarious, Malley and Fritz weren't even there and show me where Paul Bentley says he gave a full body search of Oswald??
Hill says that Bentley while sitting sideways in the cramped backseat, just reached in Oswald's pocket and grabbed his Billfold and Hill was there and provided testimony! NO mention of a full body search of Oswald who was BTW not a threat and bound in handcuffs.
Mr. BELIN. Was he asked where he lived?
Mr. HILL. That was the second question that was asked the suspect, and he didn't answer it, either.
About the time I got through with the radio transmission, I asked Paul Bentley, "Why don't you see if he has any identification."
Paul was sitting sort of sideways in the seat, and with his right hand he reached down and felt of the suspect's left hip pocket and said, "Yes, he has a billfold," and took it out.Mr. BELIN. Was he ever asked again where he lived, up to the time you got to the station?
Mr. HILL. No; I don't believe so, because when Bentley got the identification out, we had two different addresses. We had two different names, and the comment was made, "I guess we are going to have to wait until we get to the station to find out who he actually is."
After about the time Bentley reached in his pocket and got his billfold, the suspect made the statement, "I don't know why you are treating me like this. The only thing I have done is carry a pistol in a movie."
Then there was a remark made something to the effect, "Yes, sir; you have done a lot more. You have killed a policeman."
And then the suspect made a remark similar to "Well, you fry for that," or something to that effect.The first proper FULL search was by Boyd, read it and weep!
Mr. BALL. Before you went into the showup, did you search Oswald?
Mr. BOYD. Yes; I did.
Mr. BALL. And what did you find?
Mr. BOYD. I found five .38 shells, I believe it was five.
Mr. BALL. Live? Live shells?
Mr. BOYD. Yes, sir.
Mr. BALL. What did you do with them?
Mr. BOYD. Well, I put them in an envelope and put them with the rest of the property up there to be turned in.
Mr. BALL. Did you put any mark on them?
Mr. BOYD. Let me see I can look and see.
Mr. BALL. I will show you Commission Exhibit 592 in an envelope, will you take a look at that--at the cartridges?
Mr. BOYD. Yes---I got my mark on them.
Mr. BALL. You have your mark on all five of them?
Mr. BOYD. I have my mark on the first three---yes, sir---I have my mark on all of them.
Mr. BALL. On all five of them?
Mr. BOYD. Yes, sir.
Mr. BALL. You put those marks on there, did you?
Mr. BOYD. Yes, I did.
Mr. BALL. Now, looking those cartridges over, can you tell me whether these five cartridges, which constitute Commission Exhibit 592, are the cartridges which you took from Oswald?
Mr. BOYD. Yes; they are.So Michael, all you've got is some weak hearsay which doesn't say what you want and I keep presenting powerful solid evidence after solid evidence, like Hill and Boyd and Baker, real testimony and reports, whereas you got zero, zilch, nothing.
As I said you are not very good at this and you keep relying on crappy misinterpreted evidence and assumptions, while I give you the real stuff straight from the horses mouth!
PS you keep avoiding the obvious, why would the Dallas Police who you accuse of being heroes and villains in the same breath, plant bullets on a fully searched Oswald, your needlessly paranoid conspiracy narrative as usual has more holes than swiss cheese!
JohnM
