I'm convinced - CE 399 is entirely bogus!

[John Iacoletti]

The bottom line being that the unlikely condition of CE 399 and the defects in the chain of custody actually cut in favor of authenticity.

Trying to have it both ways, take one zillion and two.

If the condition of CE 399 were "likely" and it had a valid chain of custody, then it is authentic.

If the condition of CE 399 were "unlikely" and it had no valid chain of custody, then it is authentic.

This tells me that what the LN-faithful believe has absolutely nothing to do with the actual evidence.

[John Iacoletti]

Can you prove Oswald was not on the 6th floor of the TSBD at 12:30 on 11/22/1963 or do you just want us to assume he wasn't there??

If all else fails, try to shift the burden of proof.

LOL.

[John Iacoletti]

Sam Kinney did not have a story about bringing a bullet to Parkland.  Sam Kinney's neighbor has a story about Kinney bringing a bullet to Parkland hospital. Landis is not credible.

Anything that conflicts with the official fantasy is "not credible" by definition.

[John Mytton]

If all else fails, try to shift the burden of proof.

LOL.

Thanks for reinforcing the fact that the guy who owned the rifle found on the 6th floor, didn't have an alibi!

JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

Can you prove Oswald was not on the 6th floor of the TSBD at 12:30 on 11/22/1963 or do you just want us to assume he wasn't there??

JohnM

I don't have to prove anything. You make the claim that he was there, so it's up to you that he was.

Thanks for reinforcing the fact that the guy who owned the rifle found on the 6th floor, didn't have an alibi!

JohnM

Nice try to pivot away from the subject of the discussion. Too bad it isn't working.

Even if Oswald didn't have an alibi, that still does not mean he was on the 6th floor at 12:30.

[John Mytton]

You make the claim that he was there, so it's up to you that he was.

Sorry Martin ALL the evidence, from Oswald owning the rifle, Oswald's immediate flight from the scene of the crime, Oswald killing Tippit, Oswald attempting to kill more cops as he resisted arrest through to his multitude if lies while being interrogated, is conclusive evidence of  Oswald doing the deed, therefore the burden of proof is on you to prove that Oswald wasn't on the 6th floor at 12:30 on the 22nd of November 1963!
Well, waiting....Zzzzz...

JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

Sorry Martin ALL the evidence, from Oswald owning the rifle, Oswald's immediate flight from the scene of the crime, Oswald killing Tippit, Oswald attempting to kill more cops as he resisted arrest through to his multitude if lies while being interrogated, is conclusive evidence of  Oswald doing the deed, therefore the burden of proof is on you to prove that Oswald wasn't on the 6th floor at 12:30 on the 22nd of November 1963!
Well, waiting....Zzzzz...

JohnM

Nope, you don't get to make all sorts of wild and questionable claims and then consider them true unless you are proven wrong.

This has been explained to you time after time, but perhaps they do things differently in your alternate reality.