Destroying Evidence Of Murder Is What Murderers & Co-Conspirators Do

[Steve M. Galbraith]

Again: police sometimes destroy evidence of a murder not because they were the murderers but because they are framing someone. Sometimes the person is guilty; sometimes not. Simply destroying evidence doesn't mean they were involved in the crime.

If, as the evidence shows (to me), RFK took the brain and *hid* it (so to speak), does that mean RFK was a murderer or conspirator? Or does it mean he simply wanted to bury it with JFK or destroy it to prevent people from seeing it? Why can't the innocent explanation be acceptable?

This is a textbook example of conspiracy thinking. You always assume sinister designs behind an act and that's it. You won't look into whether there was a innocent explanation for what happened.

[Watson Phillips]

Again: police sometimes destroy evidence of a murder not because they were the murderers but because they are framing someone. Sometimes the person is guilty; sometimes not. Simply destroying evidence doesn't mean they were involved in the crime.

Anyone destroying evidence in a murder that has been ordered by the Medical examiner to undergo "further examination" has committed a crime .
In this case a federal crime .
The very fact that the evidence was removed from the National Archives in sneaky like a snake , under the cover of darkness fashion , absent of any federally required chain of custody documentation is a federal crime as well.
Normal people in similar circumstances of a loved one being murdered violently  and a certain body part is held for forensic exam/verification have no trouble walking in the front door , as opposed to sneaking in the back door, filling out the proper form for the release of their loved ones remains once the examination/verification has been completed
Thats how normal people who are not up no good do things. and there is not a thing wrong with that.
The presidents brain was not signed over to the only one with legal authority to receive it , Jackie .
It was not signed over at the National Archives to anyone in fact.
Reason being when they are committing a criminal act, criminals by nature do not sign their name to it .
Thats because they are up to no good.


Concealment, Removal, or Mutilation of Records
(18 U.S.C. § 2071)

(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.

[Tom Graves]

Anyone destroying evidence in a murder that has been ordered by the Medical examiner to undergo "further examination" has committed a crime.
In this case a federal crime .
The very fact that the evidence was removed from the National Archives is sneaky like a snake, under the cover of darkness fashion, absent of any federally required chain of custody documentation is a federal crime as well.
Normal people in similar circumstances of a loved one being murdered violently and a certain body part is held for forensic exam/verification have no trouble walking in the front door , as opposed to sneaking in the back door, filling out the proper form for the release of their loved ones remains once the examination/verification has been completed
Thats how normal people who are not up no good do things. and there is not a thing wrong with that.
The President's brain was not signed over to the only one with legal authority to receive it, Jackie.
It was not signed over at the National Archives to anyone in fact.
Reason being when they are committing a criminal act, criminals by nature do not sign their name to it .
Thats because they are up to no good.

Phillips,

How many evil, evil people do you figure were wittingly involved in the planning, the "patsy-ing," the shooting, and the all-important cover up?

Just a few?

Oodles and gobs?

Somewhere in between?

[Royell Storing]

Phillips,

How many evil, evil people do you figure were wittingly involved in the planning, the "patsy-ing," the shooting, and the all-important cover up?

Just a few?

Oodles and gobs?

Somewhere in between?

    How many evil, evil people were involved in the cover-up of President Biden suffering from escalating Dementia? This "stuff" is still going on and dates back to at least FDR and the cover-up of his being confined to a wheel chair. 

[Watson Phillips]

Phillips,

How many evil, evil people do you figure were wittingly involved in the planning, the "patsy-ing," the shooting, and the all-important cover up?

Just a few?

Oodles and gobs?

Somewhere in between?

My best guess for the wittingly involved  there was one no good sneak walking away from the National Archives with the presidents brain without any documented authorization to do so, assisted by one other employed at the National Archives.
Now that I think more about it however ,  the object being to just to get rid of the thing, I would not be surprised if it never left the building thru a door , but rather down the toilet
 Much less chance of being discovered that way, and the whole process could be taken care of by a single person on the inside who knew the opportune time and place within the building to take care of it .
Most likely on a federal holiday when the building was closed & only minimal staff was working.
Fewer loose ends & the people involved not being the sentimental types.

[Tom Graves]

My best guess for the wittingly involved  there was one no good sneak walking away from the National Archives with the presidents brain without any documented authorization to do so, assisted by one other employed at the National Archives.
Now that I think more about it however,  the object being to just to get rid of the thing, I would not be surprised if it never left the building thru a door , but rather down the toilet
 Much less chance of being discovered that way, and the whole process could be taken care of by a single person on the inside who knew the opportune time and place within the building to take care of it .
Most likely on a federal holiday when the building was closed & only minimal staff was working.
Fewer loose ends & the people involved not being the sentimental types.

I'm referring to the whole JFK assassination, in which so many evil, evil bad guys and really, really bad gals were SO OBVIOUSLY wittingly involved in the planning, the "patsy-ing," the shooting, and/or the all-important cover up.

(LOL)

[Tom Graves]

How many evil, evil people were involved in the cover-up of President Biden suffering from escalating Dementia? This "stuff" is still going on and dates back to at least FDR and the cover-up of his being confined to a wheelchair.

Storing,

Even if true, would your "perps," if caught and convicted, face Capital Punishment like conspirators in the assassination of a President?

Regardless, instead of obsessing on Joe Biden's alleged "dementia," how about focusing on The Traitorous Orange Bird's (rhymes with Xxxx's) "flooding the zone" with lies during the debate?