Destroying Evidence Of Murder Is What Murderers & Co-Conspirators Do

[John Iacoletti]

If some witnesses to a hit-and-run car accident say the car that took off was black but films and photos of the accident and an examination of the car show that it was white, who should we believe? What color was the car? Black or white?

If all the witnesses say it was black, and the people who actually examined the crime scene didn’t say one way or the other, and then somebody with an agenda comes along later with a few out of context photos that they claim are of this accident, then yes you should be very skeptical about whether they are or not.

[John Iacoletti]

RFK reportedly had the brain placed in JFK's grave.

“Reported” by whom?

[Watson Phillips]

The brain and other material from the autopsy - photos, tissue slides, et cetera - were reportedly placed in a locker and given to the National Archives under the custody/control of JFK's secretary Eveylyn Lincoln. Mrs. Lincoln later said she gave the material to RFK. RFK reportedly had the brain placed in JFK's grave.

Here: https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=145280#relPageId=165&search=Evelyn_Lincoln

No person but Mrs. Kennedy had legal authority to make a final determination as to her husband's remains.
Any secretive subversion of her sole legal authority in making a final determination as to her husband's remains would have been a criminal act by the secretive conspirators .
The criminal charges just keep piling up in this conspiracy to disappear his brain, absent of the coroners legal written directive that "further examination" take place .

Be that as it may,  any item accepted under the roof of the National Archives , makes the National Archives fully responsible for the security of items within it's confines.
To include a fully and specifically documented chain of custody ( Dates, Times, Purposes) of coming and going,
That is unless you are alleging that Mrs. Lincoln also established a domicile for herself within the Archives to personally watch over the container 24/7 ?
So it all boils to down to the United States National Archives chain of custody Document mandated by federal law for each and every item under the roof of the Archives ?
A really simple matter to take all the mystery out of it ?
Have you seen that documentation for the president's brain coming and going at the National Archives ?
Why not do you think ?

 

[Steve M. Galbraith]

We have films, photos, x-rays that show the damage to JFK's head. You can either accept that physical evidence or reject it. If you reject it then I doubt that you would accept the brain evidence. If the brain was available and it showed damage to the top/side of the head and not the back/rear would you accept it? Or would you say the brain was switched?

It's more than 60 years after the event. The assassination has been investigated multiple times by multiple generations of people, both in the government and out of it. Again and again and again. If you want to dismiss all of this, all of these investigations as being corrupt you are free to do so. Did the news media cover this up too? Why? For what benefit?

If you believe that, that all of this has been covered up (by people who weren't even alive?) you sound awfully silly; but the 1st Amendment protects the right of people to express silly ideas.

[Royell Storing]

If some witnesses to a hit-and-run car accident say the car that took off was black but films and photos of the accident and an examination of the car show that it was white, who should we believe? What color was the car? Black or white?

In the real world of course we conclude that it was white. Witnesses, as we know, can be wrong.

But in conspiracy world there's a 27 step explanation that says the car was black. The photos were faked. The films were faked. The examination of the car showing it was white was faked.

Because they simply can't believe it was really white.

       You either have a "Bad Memory, or a "Conveniently Bad Memory".  Do I need to remind you what CBS "60 Minutes" just did with their interview of Presidential Candidate Harris? After CBS repeatedly denied they screwed around with the interview, they finally admitted to doctoring it. I'm Not gonna argue with you as to the intent, but CBS flat-out Altered that interview. You're kidding yourself if you think the manipulation of what we see and hear is Not ongoing.

[Watson Phillips]

We have films, photos, x-rays that show the damage to JFK's head. You can either accept that physical evidence or reject it. If you reject it then I doubt that you would accept the brain evidence. If the brain was available and it showed damage to the top/side of the head and not the back/rear would you accept it? Or would you say the brain was switched?

It's more than 60 years later. The assassination has been investigated multiple times by multiple generations of people,

The legally directed forensic "further examination" of the brain has not "been investigated multiple times"

The brain vanished like a vapor before the Coroner's directive could take place.
That is a fact .
In fact at best the allegation is that the forensic evidence of the brain mandated by order of the coroner to undergo " Further Examination" was made to disappear while under government control under sneaky undocumented circumstances.
Disappearing brains always make me suspicious .


The doctors also noted in their autopsy report that “The brain is preserved and removed for further study.”

[Steve M. Galbraith]

Again: police sometimes destroy evidence of a murder not because they were the murderers but because they are framing someone. Sometimes the person is guilty; sometimes not. Simply destroying evidence doesn't mean they were involved in the crime.

If, as the evidence shows (to me), RFK took the brain and *hid* it (so to speak), does that mean RFK was a murderer or conspirator? Or does it mean he simply wanted to bury it with JFK or destroy it to prevent people from seeing it? Why can't the innocent explanation be acceptable?

This is a textbook example of conspiracy thinking. You always assume sinister designs behind an act and that's it. You won't look into whether there was a innocent explanation for what happened.

[Watson Phillips]

Again: police sometimes destroy evidence of a murder not because they were the murderers but because they are framing someone. Sometimes the person is guilty; sometimes not. Simply destroying evidence doesn't mean they were involved in the crime.

Anyone destroying evidence in a murder that has been ordered by the Medical examiner to undergo "further examination" has committed a crime .
In this case a federal crime .
The very fact that the evidence was removed from the National Archives in sneaky like a snake , under the cover of darkness fashion , absent of any federally required chain of custody documentation is a federal crime as well.
Normal people in similar circumstances of a loved one being murdered violently  and a certain body part is held for forensic exam/verification have no trouble walking in the front door , as opposed to sneaking in the back door, filling out the proper form for the release of their loved ones remains once the examination/verification has been completed
Thats how normal people who are not up no good do things. and there is not a thing wrong with that.
The presidents brain was not signed over to the only one with legal authority to receive it , Jackie .
It was not signed over at the National Archives to anyone in fact.
Reason being when they are committing a criminal act, criminals by nature do not sign their name to it .
Thats because they are up to no good.


Concealment, Removal, or Mutilation of Records
(18 U.S.C. § 2071)

(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.