Anna Luna's JFK Conspiracy Circus

[Royell Storing]

Nobody cares.

   You have now claimed "NOBODY cares" to 2 different people. Try buying a vowel.

[Tom Graves]

You have now claimed "NOBODY cares" to 2 different people. Try buying a vowel.

Dear Stormtrooper Storing,

Buy a bowel.

-- Tom

[John Corbett]

   You have now claimed "NOBODY cares" to 2 different people. Try buying a vowel.

And still nobody cares.

[Michael T. Griffith]

This kind of extreme rhetoric, reflecting an extreme bias, is one reason that most people just don't buy the lone-gunman theory. Here you have a respected member of Congress, a conservative Republican and a military veteran no less, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, who has concluded that JFK was killed by a conspiracy. Rep. Luna chairs the House Oversight Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets. The committee has been holding hearings on records related to the JFK assassination. After chairing many hours of hearings on the subject, Rep. Luna has concluded that a conspiracy killed President Kennedy.

But all you and other WC apologists can do is dismiss her and her committee's hearings as a "conspiracy circus."

Is it any wonder that 2/3 to 3/4 of the Western world doesn't agree with you and believes that Kennedy was murdered by a conspiracy?

It is worth noting that Rep. Luna served in the U.S. Air Force from 2009 to 2014 as an airfield management specialist and received the Air Force Achievement Medal, and that she holds a Bachelor of Science degree in biology from the University of West Florida.

Do you guys ever, ever stop to ask yourselves why highly educated people from all across the political spectrum disagree with the lone-gunman scenario and believe JFK was killed by a conspiracy?

You would help your cause greatly if you would stop pushing the discrediting, juvenile pretension that only people with "warped minds" and/or with little education reject the WC's lone-gunman fantasy. 

[John Corbett]

This kind of extreme rhetoric, reflecting an extreme bias, is one reason that most people just don't buy the lone-gunman theory. Here you have a respected member of Congress, a conservative Republican and a military veteran no less, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, who has concluded that JFK was killed by a conspiracy. Rep. Luna chairs the House Oversight Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets. The committee has been holding hearings on records related to the JFK assassination. After chairing many hours of hearings on the subject, Rep. Luna has concluded that a conspiracy killed President Kennedy.

So?

But all you and other WC apologists can do is dismiss her and her committee's hearings as a "conspiracy circus."

It's called telling it like it is.

Is it any wonder that 2/3 to 3/4 of the Western world doesn't agree with you and believes that Kennedy was murdered by a conspiracy?

Few of them know even a modicum of the evidence in the case. The ones that do and still think Oswald wasn't the assassin are just silly people.

It is worth noting that Rep. Luna served in the U.S. Air Force from 2009 to 2014 as an airfield management specialist and received the Air Force Achievement Medal, and that she holds a Bachelor of Science degree in biology from the University of West Florida.

So?

Do you guys ever, ever stop to ask yourselves why highly educated people from all across the political spectrum disagree with the lone-gunman scenario and believe JFK was killed by a conspiracy?

There are lots of highly educated people across the political spectrum who are very gullible.

You would help your cause greatly if you would stop pushing the discrediting, juvenile pretension that only people with "warped minds" and/or with little education reject the WC's lone-gunman fantasy.

A warped mind isn't necessary to believe nonsense. A lot of very smart people believe some really stupid things. Neil deGrasse Tyson refuses to admit thar men are athletically superior to woman.

[Mark A. Oblazney]

Neil must’ve dated Venus once, huh ?  lol

[Steve M. Galbraith]

So?
It's called telling it like it is.
Few of them know even a modicum of the evidence in the case. The ones that do and still think Oswald wasn't the assassin are just silly people.
So?
There are lots of highly educated people across the political spectrum who are very gullible.
A warped mind isn't necessary to believe nonsense. A lot of very smart people believe some really stupid things. Neil deGrasse Tyson refuses to admit thar men are athletically superior to woman.

Michael Griffith thinks that because 2/3s of people believe in something that means what they believe is true. Or is somehow in some way relevant to what actually happened, to our understanding of what occurred. Do they know anything about the event? It doesn't matter; their view on what took place is somehow relevant regardless of whether they know a single thing about that event. That doesn't make a lick of sense except in conspiracy world.

Even worse, he thinks this non-existent poll of Western opinion seemingly means he gets a blank check for whatever conspiracy fantasy pops into his head. As in: he says Babushka Lady was June Cobb who, he says, was a CIA agent. And that it's "possible" she shot JFK with a gun camera. That's absurd but 2/3s of the people believe there was a conspiracy so, using Griffith's thinking, we need to seriously consider it. After all, you're ignoring what many people think.

Side bar: After ~60 years of this, after all of these investigations, I would have thought that the influence of JFK conspiracy propaganda would have gone away, that reason eventually would emerge. Boy, that was a dumb thought.