JFK's Autopsy Photographs are Authentic

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: JFK's Autopsy Photographs are Authentic  (Read 8910 times)

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5014
Re: JFK's Autopsy Photographs are Authentic
« Reply #21 on: April 01, 2025, 01:58:13 PM »

    That crude line would be germane if the Kill Shot was coming from above the Triple Underpass. Almost Dead On. Not so, and indicative of the deception you have been forced to stoop to. I should take this as a compliment regarding the impossible to escape corner you have been backed you into, but I don't. We have newbes looking in and that "Thin Red Line" might be taken as Fact. Sometimes, I am forced into the role of, "The Gate Keeper"

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5120
Re: JFK's Autopsy Photographs are Authentic
« Reply #22 on: April 01, 2025, 02:58:53 PM »
    That crude line would be germane if the Kill Shot was coming from above the Triple Underpass. Almost Dead On. Not so, and indicative of the deception you have been forced to stoop to. I should take this as a compliment regarding the impossible to escape corner you have been backed you into, but I don't. We have newbes looking in and that "Thin Red Line" might be taken as Fact. Sometimes, I am forced into the role of, "The Gate Keeper"

Says the man who claims that the Nix film was altered to make Elm street go uphill in the opposite direction, but never gave a single thought to the fact that Nix wasn't holding his camera perfectly horizontal. And now claiming that an isolated basketball sized blood smear is evidence of a shot from the right front is your most psychotic claim yet!
Physics, geometry and photo analysis has never been your forte. :D

BTW the reason you answered none of my questions is because you can't!

1) There is no way a wound on the right rear side of Kennedy's head can deposit matter on the opposite side, it's a physical impossibility!
2) You claim your eyewitness Hargis was struck at the same time as what created your blood spatter smear but since you are stuck with your singular basketball sized deposit which you say is "a Text Book Blowout Exit Wound Blood Splatter" and this is reinforced with the Zapruder film showing no matter on the trunk, your theory of Hargis being struck as a consequence of this "blowout" goes "poof"
3) The red line is the bullet trajectory from Zapruder's POV, it doesn't extend out in front because of you know, "geometry". In fact the trajectory extends out to the right side way above the Grassy Knoll fence and is no where near the Triple underpass.

JohnM

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5120
Re: JFK's Autopsy Photographs are Authentic
« Reply #23 on: April 01, 2025, 03:23:39 PM »
That Blood/Brain Matter Stain on the Top of the Back Rest is both Large and Densely Concentrated. A Text Book Blowout Exit Wound Blood Splatter.

If the blood stain is both "Large and Densely Concentrated" and Capitalized for Greater Impact! Then where is it?



JohnM

 

Online Steve M. Galbraith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1872
Re: JFK's Autopsy Photographs are Authentic
« Reply #24 on: April 01, 2025, 03:27:33 PM »
Says the man who claims that the Nix film was altered to make Elm street go uphill in the opposite direction, but never gave a single thought to the fact that Nix wasn't holding his camera perfectly horizontal. And now claiming that an isolated basketball sized blood smear is evidence of a shot from the right front is your most psychotic claim yet!
Physics, geometry and photo analysis has never been your forte. :D

BTW the reason you answered none of my questions is because you can't!

1) There is no way a wound on the right rear side of Kennedy's head can deposit matter on the opposite side, it's a physical impossibility!
2) You claim your eyewitness Hargis was struck at the same time as what created your blood spatter smear but since you are stuck with your singular basketball sized deposit which you say is "a Text Book Blowout Exit Wound Blood Splatter" and this is reinforced with the Zapruder film showing no matter on the trunk, your theory of Hargis being struck as a consequence of this "blowout" goes "poof"
3) The red line is the bullet trajectory from Zapruder's POV, it doesn't extend out in front because of you know, "geometry". In fact the trajectory extends out to the right side way above the Grassy Knoll fence and is no where near the Triple underpass.

JohnM
Here's Hargis explaining what happened:

Question: You were sprayed with matter, and you were behind the limousine, and yet you say you initially ran to the Book Depository because of the suggestion of the direction of the shot.
Hargis: Right.
Question: But the actual - the fact that you were behind the car suggests that the shot in fact came from the front and right of the car.
Hargis: Well, that right there is what I've wondered about all along, but see there's ah -- you've got to take into consideration we were moving at the time, and when he got hit all that stuff went like this, and of course I run through it.

Again: "I run through it."

And this:
Question: Would you say that he was hit in the rear of the head, the side of the head, or the front of his head?
Hargis: If he'd got hit in the rear, I'd of been able to see it. All I saw was just a splash come out on the other side.

NARA record number 180-10096-10005 and here: https://www.jfk-assassination.net/hargis.htm



Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5014
Re: JFK's Autopsy Photographs are Authentic
« Reply #25 on: April 01, 2025, 03:38:12 PM »
  Officer Hargis got off his motorcycle, ran across Elm St and, "....I ran up up to this kind of a little wall, brick wall up there to see if I could get a better look on the BRIDGE...". (WC Testimony).  DPD Officer Hargis was HIT with blood/brain matter and judged the shot being fired from the FRONT.
« Last Edit: April 01, 2025, 03:40:10 PM by Royell Storing »

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5120
Re: JFK's Autopsy Photographs are Authentic
« Reply #26 on: April 01, 2025, 03:50:21 PM »
Here's Hargis explaining what happened:

Question: You were sprayed with matter, and you were behind the limousine, and yet you say you initially ran to the Book Depository because of the suggestion of the direction of the shot.
Hargis: Right.
Question: But the actual - the fact that you were behind the car suggests that the shot in fact came from the front and right of the car.
Hargis: Well, that right there is what I've wondered about all along, but see there's ah -- you've got to take into consideration we were moving at the time, and when he got hit all that stuff went like this, and of course I run through it.

Again: "I run through it."

And this:
Question: Would you say that he was hit in the rear of the head, the side of the head, or the front of his head?
Hargis: If he'd got hit in the rear, I'd of been able to see it. All I saw was just a splash come out on the other side.

NARA record number 180-10096-10005 and here: https://www.jfk-assassination.net/hargis.htm

Thanks for the link Steve, that page of Hargis consistently relating the same story for three decades speaks for itself, Hargis simply drove through a shower of matter, the same matter seen erupting up out the top of Kennedy's head.

Quote
Hargis: If he'd got hit in the rear, I'd of been able to see it. All I saw was just a splash come out on the other side.

Oops, Storing's insane theory of the origin of the blood smear goes "poof".

JohnM

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5014
Re: JFK's Autopsy Photographs are Authentic
« Reply #27 on: April 01, 2025, 06:53:54 PM »

   I don't wanta literally beat a dead horse, but you're proving this murder case has passed you by. Hargis is ruling out a shot from the rear. "If he'd got HIT in the rear, I'd been able to see it". "HIT" would apply to an Entrance Wound. This is why I supplied a piece of the Hargis WC Testimony. He thought the Kill Shot came from in FRONT of the JFK Limo. And again, you prove my point regarding the Old Guard JFK Research Community being lost when it comes to witness accounts and especially Sworn Testimony. You guys are absolutely clueless in these areas.