Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Explain the logic of Prayer Man please  (Read 14165 times)

Online Brian Doyle

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 242
Explain the logic of Prayer Man please
« Reply #42 on: August 27, 2026, 06:01:45 PM »


   Dealey Plaza was a good slow down and turn similar to the Heydrich assassination...But that has nothing to do with the evidence that has already proven Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton...The only two people not visible in Altgens 6 are Prayer Man and Frazier...That alone makes Prayer Man Stanton since we know she was on the top platform...

Garner said she ran right after Adams & Styles and heard them just running down the steps as Garner got to the 4th Floor staircase landing...Garner said the girls were already gone before the limousine entered the Triple Underpass...This timing means Garner was to the landing probably 40 seconds after the shots...Oswald would have needed to cross the 4th Floor landing at 70 seconds after the shots...This proves, dead to rights, that Oswald was in the Lunch Room the whole time...The reason Oswald got up from his lunch in the 2nd Floor Lunch Room and looked out the Lunch Room Vestibule door window was because he heard Adams & Styles clattering by on their way down the stairs...Garner never saw or heard Oswald because he was in the 2nd Floor Lunch Room during the assassination...

Online John Corbett

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2310
Re: Explain the logic of Prayer Man please
« Reply #43 on: August 27, 2026, 06:18:39 PM »

   Dealey Plaza was a good slow down and turn similar to the Heydrich assassination...But that has nothing to do with the evidence that has already proven Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton...The only two people not visible in Altgens 6 are Prayer Man and Frazier...That alone makes Prayer Man Stanton since we know she was on the top platform...

Garner said she ran right after Adams & Styles and heard them just running down the steps as Garner got to the 4th Floor staircase landing...Garner said the girls were already gone before the limousine entered the Triple Underpass...This timing means Garner was to the landing probably 40 seconds after the shots...Oswald would have needed to cross the 4th Floor landing at 70 seconds after the shots...This proves, dead to rights, that Oswald was in the Lunch Room the whole time...The reason Oswald got up from his lunch in the 2nd Floor Lunch Room and looked out the Lunch Room Vestibule door window was because he heard Adams & Styles clattering by on their way down the stairs...Garner never saw or heard Oswald because he was in the 2nd Floor Lunch Room during the assassination...

This is typical of your illogical outlook on every aspect of the JFKA.

Online Mark A. Oblazney

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 557
Re: Explain the logic of Prayer Man please
« Reply #44 on: Today at 07:43:37 AM »
dang, just returned from Duncan’s original ‘prayer woman’ thread.  wow.  do NOT go there! a million and a quarter views!  historic!  actually, it’s not so bad since Albert’s posts don’t show up (lol).  so who saw prayer WOMAN first?  the chicken or the egg?
anyway, it’s closed, so thankfully no more comments.

Online Brian Doyle

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 242
Explain the logic of Prayer Man please
« Reply #45 on: Today at 05:25:38 PM »


    When the woman's dress neckline appeared a couple of years ago John Cotter and some other members posted that it vindicated "The much maligned Brian Doyle"...There was, of course, no honest response to Cotter's remark on the forum...The Alpha Wolves on The Education Forum have hijacked the forum and are enforcing non-mention of myself or my research under any circumstances...Gordon was still in charge when that new evidence from the 6th Floor Museum 1st generation copy of Darnell emerged so the Alpha Wolves knew they would have backing for their dishonesty and not have to account for evidence that proved they were squarely wrong and therefore had persecuted and censored an innocent researcher whose evidence proved to be correct...That's how Jim DiEugenio rolls...Gordon was, at that time, wandering away from the forum and abandoning it...Perhaps out of the realization that I had won...The Education Forum almost lost their site due to them not detecting a rogue administrator and keeping him honest...Iler knows exactly what shoes he's filling and what is expected of him...The "Moderator Team" keeps members from pointing out the sheer conflict of interest Iler's association with Jim DiEugenio represents...Iler's power is purely technical and is due to Invision's proprietary rules that are written in favor of legality instead of academic honesty...Jim D ignores all this and leans entirely on censorship and shunning and his bet pays off...Sandy Larsen also knew what was expected of him and helped save the clique from losing face by declaring that the dress neckline was a CIA forgery designed to conceal Oswald's work shirt collar...Larsen did that with no evidence what so ever on a site where Iler hypocritically announces that such evidence is required of all members...Larsen was then allowed to ignore layers of other evidence that showed the neckline was Sarah Stanton's dress neckline...Though Iler sells himself as a caller for objective proof and the best evidence he ignores that Schnapf and others have worked the forum and are using the bias they enjoy to avoid calling for the 6th Floor Museum copy of Darnell...They are avoiding that copy because the favored clique members have worked their favored status and lobbied the forum to not call for the best available copy of Darnell...The simple reason for this is because they know the 6th Floor Museum copy will expose their wrongness on Prayer Man and it is not something they are going to willingly admit while they are in control of the forum...

Online John Corbett

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2310
Re: Explain the logic of Prayer Man please
« Reply #46 on: Today at 06:16:13 PM »

    When the woman's dress neckline appeared a couple of years ago John Cotter and some other members posted that it vindicated "The much maligned Brian Doyle"...

So you were correct about an irrelevant triviality. Congratulations. You must be so proud.