Those mysterious frontal gunmen

[John Mytton]

  The Muchmore images of 3 Men standing on the bottom of The Steps does Not disprove the WHITE SHIRT MAN moving Up-the-Steps on the NIX FILM. What Muchmore does is Prove there is a major issue regarding these JFK Assassination Images contradicting each other. Also, do Not forget that Lee Bowers gave WC Testimony corroborating a WHITE SHIRT MAN being in this same area. And you can also include the Willis 5 photo showing Only 2 men standing at the bottom of The Steps. Willis 5 adds a 3rd JFK Assassination Image at odds with the Muchmore images of 3 Men standing at the bottom of The Steps.

I really don't know why you continue to lie? I really don't know?

There is nothing wrong with the JFKA images and to continually suggest that there is "major issues" and especially since you have never proved any of your allegations seriously harms your credibility, no that's a mistake, you never had any credibility.

Anyway all the images are perfectly consistent.

1) Willis 5 is pretty blurry and there is not enough image information to deny that there is 3 men with 1 man partially obscured by the one in front. And the guy on the right is wearing what appears to be a darker cardigan.



2) Moorman shows three men on the steps. and the guy on the right is wearing a darker cardigan.



3) Muchmore shows three guys on the steps with the guy on the right wearing a darker cardigan.



4) Nix shows three men on the steps with one disappearing into the shadows.



5) This high res Nix frame shows the man who is about to enter the shadow is wearing a darker top which is brown.



JohnM

[Lance Payette]

Maybe it's just me, but I see five men on the steps, two with guns and one wearing a Packers sweatshirt. Are we on the same page here, Royell?

Honestly, what is the issue even supposed to be??? In my review of the evidence, I did find - really! - a shower curtain for $68 that is nothing but the three guys on the steps. The ad explained that Royell's White Shirt Guy was actually one of the gunmen and that this is quite obvious. Is that what you - I mean we - believe, Royell?

[Duncan MacRae]

 

Light Brown Cardigan/Sweater With White Shirt Underneath The Cardigan/Sweater

       
       
         

[Royell Storing]

   With respect to WILLIS 5:  "...not enough image information to Deny that there is 3 Men with 1 man partially obscured by the one in front'. When has it EVER been PROVEN that there are 3 Men standing at the bottom of The Steps on Willis 5? It NEVER has been Proven. The Old Guard JFK Assassination Researchers have simply Agreed among themselves that are 3 Men standing there. That's PROOF of Nothing. That's merely an Agreement on the level of the Secret Handshake used by Den 3, Pack #625, Cub Scouts of America. The MISSING 3rd Man in Willis 5 is Emmitt Hudson. Hudson was wearing Lightly Colored Slacks and a Whitish BRIGHT Hat on 11/22/63. Where is there any trace of Lightly Colored Slacks, (either leg), or a White'ish BRIGHT Hat anywhere in the Willis 5 photo? There is absolutely NO trace of Hudson's Lightly Colored Slacks from the ground upward, or his WHITE Hat from Head Height Downward. Just tell me what You actually SEE on Willis 5. NOT what you Think is Supposed to be there. That 3rd Man is simply NOT THERE on Willis 5.
   With respect to the NIX FILM - We see the BACK of the WHITE SHIRT MAN as he moves Up-the-Steps. His WHITE Shirt is covering his entire BACK. The man wearing a GREEN Cardigan would have his GREEN Cardigan covering his entire BACK. We see absolutely NO GREEN on the BACK of the WHITE SHIRT MAN as he moves Up-the-steps. NONE! ALL we see is WHITE. Total WHITE! And do Not forget that the Original NIX FLIM has been missing for decades.
    We have a Stark Discrepancy between assassination images. These images flat-out contradict each other.  Just tell this Forum what you actually SEE on these assassination images. NOT what you Think should be there.

[Lance Payette]

Wow, the price is already up to $88!

https://pixels.com/featured/close-up-of-jfks-assassin-moorman.html?product=shower-curtain&srsltid=AfmBOorQq5Qbvlr8HJEk2Wg5iMJKZBIeyZeNM7wfLR9PZLriz42yHTRq

Anyone who does not have one of these puppies cannot realistically call himself a JFKA researcher.

I'm told that if you're in the shower looking out, that's when you see the other gunman and the guy in the Packers shirt.

[John Iacoletti]

Yet another tedious example of an argument that goes like this:

"This vast conspiracy that I just dreamed up in my head would never do something like X, because it makes "no sense" to me.  Therefore there was no conspiracy.  Therefore, Oswald did it."

[Tom Graves]

Yet another tedious example of an argument that goes like this:

"This vast conspiracy that I just dreamed up in my head would never do something like X, because it makes "no sense" to me.  Therefore there was no conspiracy.  Therefore, Oswald did it."

Which JFKA conspiracy, vast or otherwise, do you prefer, Iacoletti?