JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
The Warren Commission Sham
Dan O'meara:
--- Quote from: Tom Graves on September 11, 2025, 12:03:25 AM ---Danny Boy O'meara,
Since CE-399 and the two large bullet fragments that were found in the limo have Oswald's Carcano's marks on them, and since it was found in-or-at Parkland Hospital when JFK was in Trauma Room One, CE-399 must have been fired during the assassination, right?
-- Tom
--- End quote ---
Who found it at Parkland because it wasn't Darrell Tomlinson.
Where do you get the idea from that CE399 was found at Parkland?
Tom Graves:
--- Quote from: Dan O'meara on September 11, 2025, 12:11:00 AM ---Who found it at Parkland because it wasn't Darrell Tomlinson.
Where do you get the idea from that CE399 was found at Parkland?
--- End quote ---
Danny Boy,
How do you know Tomlinson didn't find it?
Is that what Mark Lane, Oliver Stone, and/or Vladimir Putin told you?
Do you think the evil, evil bad guys planted it on a gurney in Parkland Hospital on 11/22/63 for someone like Tomlinson to find, or maybe planted it in the limo for someone like hard-drinking, future-book-writer, Secret Service agent Landis to find?
Or . . . gasp . . . do you think the evil, evil FBI somehow created it after-the-fact?
Do you have no clue?
-- Tom
Lance Payette:
--- Quote from: Royell Storing on September 10, 2025, 04:49:39 PM --- You stole that peanut butter out of a jar with a spoon from Joe Black. Google it.
--- End quote ---
Stole? Goodness, you are in the grip of the conspiracy-prone mindset! I have been eating peanut butter with a spoon at least every other morning for 40 years.
As far as humoring CTers, I have utterly no problem engaging with CTers who say something at least halfway new and substantive and worth discussing. This is, alas, hardly the norm on internet forums.
What I do not understand engaging with or humoring is CTers who (1) say obviously ridiculous things from the far edge of the lunatic fringe, and/or (2) insist on rehashing the same old arguments that have been discussed 9,000 times previously as though new ground were going to be broken or minds were going to be changed on the 9,001st attempt. This, alas, is the norm on internet forums - including this one, in spades.
Yes, the world needs yet another thread on "how deceitful and untrustworthy the Warren Commission was." ::) Was not, was too, you're crazy, no it's you, shut the eff up.
I cannot, of course, speak for others. Perhaps even some LNers enjoy this endless mental masturbation with folks like you and Dan and numerous others I could mention. I simply say ...
B-O-R-I-N-G
Tom Graves:
--- Quote from: Lance Payette on September 11, 2025, 02:41:01 AM ---Stole? Goodness, you are in the grip of the conspiracy-prone mindset! I have been eating peanut butter with a spoon at least every other morning for 40 years.
As far as humoring CTers, I have utterly no problem engaging with CTers who say something at least halfway new and substantive and worth discussing. This is, alas, hardly the norm on internet forums.
What I do not understand engaging with or humoring is CTers who (1) say obviously ridiculous things from the far edge of the lunatic fringe, and/or (2) insist on rehashing the same old arguments that have been discussed 9,000 times previously as though new ground were going to be broken or minds were going to be changed on the 9,001st attempt. This, alas, is the norm on internet forums - including this one, in spades.
Yes, the world needs yet another thread on "how deceitful and untrustworthy the Warren Commission was." Was not, was too, you're crazy, no it's you, shut the eff up.
I cannot, of course, speak for others. Perhaps even some LNers enjoy this endless mental xxxxxxxxxxxx with folks like you and Dan and numerous others I could mention. I simply say ...
--- End quote ---
Poor Fancy Pants.
Maybe you should get back into UFOs.
Dan O'meara:
--- Quote from: Tom Graves on September 11, 2025, 12:22:43 AM ---Danny Boy,
How do you know Tomlinson didn't find it?
Is that what Mark Lane, Oliver Stone, and/or Vladimir Putin told you?
Do you think the evil, evil bad guys planted it on a gurney in Parkland Hospital on 11/22/63 for someone like Tomlinson to find, or maybe planted it in the limo for someone like hard-drinking, future-book-writer, Secret Service agent Landis to find?
Or . . . gasp . . . do you think the evil, evil FBI somehow created it after-the-fact?
Do you have no clue?
-- Tom
--- End quote ---
How do you know Tomlinson didn't find it?
Because he handed the bullet he found to O P Wright who stated, unequivocally, that it was not CE399.
This is the reason why both Tomlinson and Wright refused to identify CE399 as the bullet they handled that day.
That's how I know Tomlinson didn't find CE399.
Now, back to you Thomas - Where do you get the idea from that CE399 was found at Parkland?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version