The Warren Commission Sham

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
Richard Smith, Steve M. Galbraith

Author Topic: The Warren Commission Sham  (Read 64099 times)

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3863
Re: The Warren Commission Sham
« Reply #224 on: September 10, 2025, 04:45:34 PM »
Advertisement
Exactly, but those agencies were involved in covering information but weren't necessarily involved in an assassination plot.

    What you are describing is the equivalent of a "wheel man". Helping a murderer escape from a murder? You too are going to the "chair". (1963)

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The Warren Commission Sham
« Reply #224 on: September 10, 2025, 04:45:34 PM »


Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3863
Re: The Warren Commission Sham
« Reply #225 on: September 10, 2025, 04:48:01 PM »
YAWN.

No, sorry ...

MASSIVE YAWN.

Important to highlight the deceitfulness of the WC??? Gee, the CT community has never hit on that angle before ...  ::) ::) ::)

Why are these folks even humored? Doesn't this start to look less like discussion and more than mental illness?

Do you have anything NEW to add, ever? OCD can be treated, you know.

   "Why are those folks humored"? Because they are in the Majority. Lump it or like it, You are in the minority.

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3863
Re: The Warren Commission Sham
« Reply #226 on: September 10, 2025, 04:49:39 PM »
It's 6 AM. I am still in my jammies, my good man, and I've just finished my coffee and peanut butter (right out of the jar, with a spoon!).

People who are B-O-R-I-N-G are never a hoot, and my definition of "hoot" is growing increasingly narrow as I participate here. Now that Team Sock Puppet has come out of the woodwork, perhaps the Hoot Factor will increase exponentially.

I was responding to O'Meara's post, and now it seems to have disappeared. What happened? Did I shame him into deleting it? (Oh, wait, I see what I did - I somehow responded to the original post in this thread. My bad. Well, the point is still valid.)

  You stole that peanut butter out of a jar with a spoon from Joe Black. Google it.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The Warren Commission Sham
« Reply #226 on: September 10, 2025, 04:49:39 PM »


Online Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3540
Re: The Warren Commission Sham
« Reply #227 on: September 10, 2025, 09:20:11 PM »
It's 6 AM. I am still in my jammies, my good man, and I've just finished my coffee and peanut butter (right out of the jar, with a spoon!).

People who are B-O-R-I-N-G are never a hoot, and my definition of "hoot" is growing increasingly narrow as I participate here. Now that Team Sock Puppet has come out of the woodwork, perhaps the Hoot Factor will increase exponentially.

I was responding to O'Meara's post, and now it seems to have disappeared. What happened? Did I shame him into deleting it? (Oh, wait, I see what I did - I somehow responded to the original post in this thread. My bad. Well, the point is still valid.)

Go back to bed you silly old fool.

Online Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3540
Re: The Warren Commission Sham
« Reply #228 on: September 10, 2025, 09:30:49 PM »
Dear Danny Boy O'meara,

I asked:

Did CE-399 wound JFK and/or JBC?

You replied:

Not a chance. The admission of CE399 into evidence is one of the more disgraceful episodes in the Warren Commission sham.

My question:

Did the bad guys plant CE-399 (either in Parkland Hospital or in the limo)?

If so, did they deform it so strangely (i.e., with no damage to the nose, with 1/3 to 1/2 of one side flattened near the rear, with lead core extruding from its base, and with a longitudinal twist) by firing into some cotton wadding or into a bucket of water?

Did they squeeze it in a vise???

-- Tom

Dear Tommy the Commie McMahon,

I've not got a clue how CE399 was deformed, just that it wasn't done during the assassination.
The detailed arguments informing my opinion on this matter are laid out in this thread and elsewhere.
GFY.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The Warren Commission Sham
« Reply #228 on: September 10, 2025, 09:30:49 PM »


Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1790
Re: The Warren Commission Sham
« Reply #229 on: September 11, 2025, 12:03:25 AM »
I've not got a clue how CE399 was deformed, just that it wasn't done during the assassination.

Danny Boy O'meara,

Since CE-399 and the two large bullet fragments that were found in the limo have Oswald's Carcano's marks on them, and since it was found in-or-at Parkland Hospital when JFK was in Trauma Room One, CE-399 must have been fired during the assassination, right?

-- Tom


Online Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3540
Re: The Warren Commission Sham
« Reply #230 on: September 11, 2025, 12:11:00 AM »
Danny Boy O'meara,

Since CE-399 and the two large bullet fragments that were found in the limo have Oswald's Carcano's marks on them, and since it was found in-or-at Parkland Hospital when JFK was in Trauma Room One, CE-399 must have been fired during the assassination, right?

-- Tom

Who found it at Parkland because it wasn't Darrell Tomlinson.
Where do you get the idea from that CE399 was found at Parkland?
« Last Edit: September 11, 2025, 12:12:15 AM by Dan O'meara »

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1790
Re: The Warren Commission Sham
« Reply #231 on: September 11, 2025, 12:22:43 AM »
Who found it at Parkland because it wasn't Darrell Tomlinson.
Where do you get the idea from that CE399 was found at Parkland?

Danny Boy,

How do you know Tomlinson didn't find it?

Is that what Mark Lane, Oliver Stone, and/or Vladimir Putin told you?

Do you think the evil, evil bad guys planted it on a gurney in Parkland Hospital on 11/22/63 for someone like Tomlinson to find, or maybe planted it in the limo for someone like hard-drinking, future-book-writer, Secret Service agent Landis to find?

Or . . . gasp . . . do you think the evil, evil FBI somehow created it after-the-fact?

Do you have no clue?

-- Tom
« Last Edit: September 11, 2025, 12:28:55 AM by Tom Graves »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The Warren Commission Sham
« Reply #231 on: September 11, 2025, 12:22:43 AM »